Go to Navigation
 

Are the tools built into the products adequate?

Smooth integration of elements is necessary.

Use of external collaboration tools can be implemented with both products.

The tools used in the class portion do not need to be the same as the ones used externally.

The collaboration tools need to be functional outside of the courses by August.

Chat

Good for logistics, not depth
Could be used for online office hours, especially in conjunction with a white board program
Needs to support student creation of chat rooms for study sessions, group projects, and social interaction
Needs to support logged chat

Threaded Discussion

The user interface defines most of this tool's functionality
Supports in-depth communication better than chat

Calendar

Least important of functions
It must be able to integrate with Microsoft Exchange

WebCT

Blackboard

Conclusions
The collaboration tools were the focus of the discussion. Neither product has tools robust enough to extend outside the classroom. Both products seem able to support external chat and discussion tools within the course environment. If the tools are hosted within the system, authentication can be maintained. While it is necessary to provide collaboration tools external to the class sites, that does not mean that the group cannot and should not control the functionality and use of the tools outside of the courses. Use in all areas should be monitored, and access should be controlled. It was decided that policy concerns regarding legal and ethical use of the chat rooms (necessitating such technical solutions as logged chat rooms) were outside the scope of the meeting.

Outcome: WebCT wins on chat; tie on discussion board; the calendar was removed from consideration.

 

 


Bb 9 logo Attention: We have a NEW support site for Blackboardnumber 9
The information below refers to Blackboard version 8.
The University of Texas at Austin
Login
Login to Blackboard