Example: Task analytic rubric for a case study
| 1 point | 2 points | 3 points | 4 points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Introductory material |
There is no introduction. The purpose is not identified. |
The introduction is present. Identification of the purpose and central questions is sketchy. |
The introduction provides an adequate context for the project. The purpose is identified through reference to one or more central questions. |
The introduction provides a well-developed context for the project. The significance of central questions is illustrated by references to course materials. |
Descriptions of the setting and data collection process |
The narrative contains an incomplete or vague description of the setting, and no description of the data collection process. |
The narrative contains an adequate description of the setting, but an incomplete description of the data collection process. |
The narrative contains adequate descriptions of the case study setting and the data collection process. |
The narrative contains well-developed descriptions of the setting and the data collection process (which is built upon concepts from current research, theory, and course materials). |
Record of observations |
The narrative contains observations from only one perspective, or of a single type of data |
The narrative contains observations from at least two sources. |
The narrative contains observations from multiple sources or includes qualitative and quantitative data. |
The narrative contains observations from multiple sources, includes qualitative and quantitative data, and makes references to models of appropriate practice that are supported by current research and theory. |
Discussion, logic, and conclusions |
The discussion is incomplete or illogical, and conclusions are missing or unrelated to the central questions. |
The discussion is adequate, but conclusions--if present--do not match the central questions. |
The discussion seems complete. Conclusions are logical and address the central questions. |
The discussion seems complete. Conclusions are logical; they address the central questions, suggest possible strategies for addressing weaknesses, and are tied to the course work. |
Presentation's clarity and style |
At least three (3) of the following are true: The project contains multiple errors in grammar, spelling or mechanics. The page layout is cluttered. Navigation between sections is unclear. APA format is not used for in-text and bibliographical references to external resources. |
Two (2) of the following are true: The project contains multiple errors in grammar, spelling or mechanics. The page layout is cluttered. Navigation between sections is unclear. APA format is not used for in-text and bibliographical references to external resources. |
One (1) of the following is true: The project contains multiple or serious errors in grammar, spelling or mechanics. The page layout is cluttered. Navigation between sections is unclear. APA format is not used for in-text and bibliographical references to external resources |
All of the following are true: The project contains no serious errors in grammar, spelling or mechanics. The page layout facilitates understanding of the narrative. ¨ Navigation between sections is clear. APA format is used for in-text and bibliographical references to external resources. |
Additional information
Rubric for assessing case study. Retrieved May 5, 2004 from http://gsep.pepperdine.edu/~mmfisher/665/665rubtable.html

