Example: Task analytic rubric for a research article
| Criteria | 5 points | 3 points | 1 point | 0 point | Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Purpose of research |
Clearly identified/Lit review precisely summarized |
Understandable and brief. Only part of lit review discussed |
Vague and wordy |
Incomprehensible and no mention of lit review |
|
| 2. | Problem statement |
Clearly stated |
Understandable |
Vague and wordy |
Incomprehensible |
|
| 3. | Human subjects approval |
Necessary/ Unnecessary Clearly stated rationale |
Necessary/ Unnecessary Rationale not specific |
Did not address approval Rationale not specific |
Topic not addressed |
|
| 4. | Research questions or Hypotheses |
Clearly stated |
Understandable |
Vague and wordy |
Incomprehensible |
|
| 5. | Research design |
Clearly summarized and accurate |
Understandable but not completely accurate |
Vague with some accuracy |
Incomprehensible and completely inaccurate |
|
| 6. | Findings |
Clearly summarized, precise, accurate, giving both demographic data and data to support claim. |
Understandable with only part of the data to support claim. |
Vague and not completely accurate. Only giving data to partially support claim. |
Totally inaccurate discussion of data. |
|
| 7. | Conclusions interpretation of results |
Extremely clear and precise and accurately identified. |
Understandable and brief, but accurate. |
Vague and wordy, only partially accurate. |
Incomprehensible and totally inaccurate. |
|
| 8. | Recommendations |
Very clear and accurately reported. |
Understandable and partially accurate. |
Vague and wordy. |
Incomprehensible |
|
| 9. | Research utilization |
Model clearly identified and strategies for implementation succinctly identified |
Model clearly identified and some strategies for implementation identified |
Model identified but not linked to strategies and implementation is unclear |
Model not identified, no strategies for implementation |
|
| 10. | Follows assignment directions, including APA format Grammar, spelling, and sentence structure |
Follows directions and turns paper in on time. Perfect. |
Directions followed with some minimal deviations. Minor errors. |
Missed most of the instructions.
Major errors. |
Did not turn in assignment on time. Many major errors. |
|
Additional information
Grading rubric: Analysis, critique and utilization of research article. Retrieved July 20, 2006 from South Dakota State University College of Nursing, Nursing 474 Web site: http://learn.sdstate.edu/smyert/rubrica.html

