The University of Texas at Austin
  DIIA logo  
and
 
  division of instructional innovation and assessment    
Teaching & Learning Resources
Enhancing Teaching Excellence
DIIA Blog
Teaching with Technology
GSI Program
~FAST Tex & IITAP
K-16 Coordination
Research

Educational Measurement
Research Projects
Research Reports
Scholarship of Teaching
Technology Development

Seminars & Training

Teaching with Blackboard & eGradebook
ASPECTS
New & Experienced Faculty Seminars
Instructional Workshops

Consulting Services

Course Instructional Development
Blackboard & eGradebook
Web & Multimedia

Assessment & Evaluation

Workshops
Outcomes Assessment
Instructional Assessment
Instructional Assessment Resources (IAR)
Ongoing Course Assessment
Credit by Exam & Course Placement
Testing & Grading Strategies
Course-Instructor Survey
Test Scanning Services

About DIIA

Make a Gift to DIIA
Directions & Maps
Contact Information
Staff List
Mission
iDIIA Box

Site Required Plug-ins

last updated: Oct 19 2009
Web Site Questions and Comments
The University of Texas at Austin

Executive Vice President and Provost

ABOUT | APPLY | FAQ | GUIDELINES | JUDGING | WINNERS | ARCHIVES | CONTACT

Judging Considerations

Entries will be reviewed by a panel of faculty experts to determine finalists. Finalists will be judged by a panel including a UT student, previous IITAP award recipients, members of the UT Academy of Distinguished Teachers, experts in instructional design, and members of the New Media Consortium.

IITAP judges will consider the use of technology to find innovative solutions to stated teaching or learning problems offering clear advantages over traditional techniques.

Reviewers and judges will consider the following when evaluating entries:

  • The instructional process used to develop this entry is exceptional or particularly innovative;
  • The entry’s technological fit within its context is new, unique, and advanced while offering clear advantages over traditional techniques;
  • The entry connects the learning experience and subject matter to the students' lives;
  • The entry enables students to gain insight, understanding and skills;
  • The entry supports teaching endeavors, enables student understanding, and benefits the department, college or university as a whole;
  • The entry has produced documented outcomes;
  • Technical operation: the entry runs without crashes or hang-ups;
  • User interface design: clear navigation and usability; consistent, intuitive, and aesthetically pleasing;
  • Engagement and interactivity: the balance between student control and instructional support offered by the entry encourages engagement and affords interactivity;
  • Content presentation: content is clear, readable, well-organized, well-crafted, rich, and deep given the learning context and the subject area;
  • Media quality: high-quality graphics, video, sound, animations, if applicable;
  • Accommodation of learner preferences: multiple entry points into the content—supportive of several learning styles.

Note: The demonstration video will not be judged. It is the entrant’s opportunity to show judges the most innovative and effective features of the entry that a text description may not adequately convey.