| |
Percent Choosing Each Response |
Avg. |
No. Replies
This Item |
| |
Str Disag |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Str Agree |
N/A |
|
|
| 1 PATIENT ASSIGNMENTS WERE APPROPRIATE |
0 |
3 |
4 |
44 |
48 |
0 |
4.4 |
644 |
| 2 WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS AIDED LEARNING |
1 |
7 |
10 |
47 |
34 |
0 |
4.1 |
661 |
| 3 WORTHWHILE MATERIAL IN CONF. NOT IN TEXT |
1 |
7 |
11 |
45 |
36 |
0 |
4.1 |
653 |
| 4 INTEGRATION OF THEORY INTO PRACTICE |
1 |
3 |
4 |
43 |
46 |
3 |
4.4 |
679 |
| 5 INSTRUCTOR WAS CLINICALLY EXPERT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
68 |
0 |
4.6 |
651 |
| 6 RELATED THEORY TO CLINICAL SITUATIONS |
1 |
1 |
5 |
37 |
55 |
2 |
4.5 |
664 |
| 7 SET REALISTIC EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENT |
1 |
3 |
5 |
36 |
55 |
1 |
4.4 |
661 |
| 8 ALLOWED FOR DISCUSSION PRIOR PERFORM SKL |
0 |
2 |
4 |
39 |
52 |
3 |
4.4 |
610 |
| 9 DEMONSTRATED CONFIDENCE IN STUDENTS |
0 |
3 |
5 |
34 |
56 |
2 |
4.5 |
652 |
| 10 ALLOWED TO PERFORM SKILL W/O TAKING OVER |
0 |
2 |
5 |
36 |
55 |
2 |
4.5 |
617 |
| 11 GAVE FEEDBACK ON CLINICAL PERFORMANCE |
0 |
4 |
9 |
34 |
46 |
8 |
4.3 |
691 |
| 12 GAVE CRITICISM IN CONSTRUCTIVE MANNER |
1 |
3 |
6 |
36 |
53 |
1 |
4.4 |
642 |
| 13 INSTRUCTOR GAVE POSITIVE FEEDBACK |
1 |
1 |
6 |
32 |
54 |
6 |
4.5 |
677 |
| |
Far Less |
Less Than |
As Expctd |
More Than |
Far More |
|
|
| 14 COMPARISON WITH LEARNING EXPECTATIONS |
0 |
7 |
30 |
47 |
15 |
0 |
3.7 |
642 |
| |
0 |
1 to 2 |
3 to 4 |
5 to 6 |
7 + |
|
|
| 15 AVERAGE HOURS PER WEEK SPENT PREPARING |
0 |
20 |
42 |
20 |
18 |
0 |
|
610 |
| |
Str Disag |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Str Agree |
|
|
| 16 COURSE BUILT ON PREVIOUS LEARNING |
0 |
3 |
7 |
57 |
32 |
0 |
4.2 |
635 |
| 17 MATERIAL STIMULATED CRITICAL THINKING |
1 |
4 |
12 |
56 |
27 |
0 |
4.0 |
633 |
| 18 EXPECTATION CLEARLY COMMUNITCATED |
1 |
2 |
8 |
57 |
32 |
0 |
4.2 |
632 |