Profile
Tatjana Lichtenstein
Assistant Professor — Ph.D., University of Toronto, Canada
Contact
- E-mail: lichtens@austin.utexas.edu
- Phone: 512-475-6171
- Office: GAR 0.110
- Campus Mail Code: B7000
Biography
Tatjana Lichtenstein holds degrees from the University of Toronto, Brandeis University, and the University of Copenhagen. She was the Schusterman Teaching Fellow in Jewish Studies at American University, Washington D.C., before coming to UT.
EUS F346 • Introduction To The Holocaust
84055 •
Summer 2013
Meets
MTWTHF 100pm-230pm JGB 2.218
(also listed as
HIS F362G, J S F364, REE F335 )
show description
Course Description
This course on the Holocaust examines the mass killing of Jews and other victims in the context of Nazi Germany’s quest for race and space during World War II. Using sources that illuminate victim experiences, perpetrator perspectives, and bystander responses, we investigate the Nazi racial state, the experiments in mass killing, the establishment of a systematic genocidal program, collaboration and complicity, resistance and rescue, as well as the memory of the Holocaust in western culture.
Course Books
Gitta Sereny, Into that Darkness
Steve Hochstadt, Sources of the Holocaust
Doris Bergen, War and Genocide: A Concise History of the Holocaust
Grades
Attendance and Participation 20%
Midterm 20%
Essay 30%
Final Exam 30%
EUS 346 • Introduction To The Holocaust
36305 •
Spring 2012
Meets
TTH 930am-1100am GAR 0.102
(also listed as
HIS 362G, J S 364, REE 335 )
show description
This course on the Holocaust examines the mass killing of Jews and other victims in the context of Nazi Germany’s quest for race and space during World War II. Using sources that illuminate victim experiences, perpetrator perspectives, and bystander responses, we investigate the Nazi racial state, the experiments in mass killing, the establishment of a systematic genocidal program, collaboration and complicity, resistance and rescue, as well as the memory of the Holocaust in western culture.
Texts
Marion Kaplan, Between Dignity and Despair
Gitta Sereny, Into that Darkness
Lianna Millu, Smoke over Birkenau
Steve Hochstadt, Sources of the Holocaust
Doris Bergen, War and Genocide: A Concise History of the Holocaust
+ Course Packet
Grading
Attendance 15%
In-class Test I 10%
In-class Test II 15%
Essay 25%
Final Exam 35%
EUS 346 • Uncovering Jewish Prague-Cze
36320 •
Spring 2012
Meets
(also listed as
HIS 362G, J S 364, R S 357 )
show description
Please see the History Dept (home department) for the course description.
EUS 346 • Introduction To The Holocaust
36515 •
Spring 2011
Meets
TTH 330pm-500pm BUR 208
(also listed as
HIS 362G, J S 364, REE 335 )
show description
This course on the Holocaust examines the mass killing of Jews and other victims in the context of Nazi Germany’s quest for race and space during World War II. Using sources that illuminate victim experiences, perpetrator perspectives, and bystander responses, we investigate the Nazi racial state, the experiments in mass killing, the establishment of a systematic genocidal program, collaboration and complicity, resistance and rescue, as well as the memory of the Holocaust in western culture.
Books
Marion Kaplan, Between Dignity and Despair
Gitta Sereny, Into that Darkness
Art Spiegelman, Maus I & II
Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3.
Saul Friedlander, Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1933-1945
Grading
Attendance 10%
Map Quiz 5%
Midterm 15%
Essay 1 20%
Essay 2 20%
Final Exam 30%
EUS 346 • World War II In Eastern Europe
36535 •
Spring 2011
Meets
M 400pm-700pm GAR 1.126
(also listed as
HIS 350L, J S 364, REE 335 )
show description
HIS 350L
In Eastern Europe, the Second World War was, as the Czech Jewish woman Heda Margolius-Kovaly remarked, “a war no one had quite survived.” Wedged between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Empire, Eastern Europe was the site of unprecedented human and material destruction in the years between 1938 and 1948. As the staging ground for Hitler’s vision for a new racial order in Europe, the region was devastated by genocide and ethnic cleansing, programs of economic and social exploitation, and warfare. Using a wide variety of sources, this course will examine the war in Eastern Europe with a particular emphasis on occupation, collaboration, and resistance; the Holocaust; and the connection between ethnic cleansing, population transfer, and the establishment of Communism in postwar Eastern Europe.
Texts
Alan Adelson, ed., The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks from the ?ód? Ghetto (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Lee Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front (New York: Pearson Longman, 2009)
Tadeusz Borowski, This Way for the Gas Ladies and Gentlemen (New York: Penguin Classics, 1976)
Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (New York: Harper Perennial, 1998)
Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)
Optional:Karel C. Berhoff, Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004)
Electronic Readings: Material marked with * are available on-line through the course website (under Course Documents).
Grading
Participation (incl. final 3 page reflection essay) 25%
Map Quiz 5%
Weekly Questions and In-Class Writing 5%
Document Analysis (2-3 pages) 10%
Essay 1 (3-4 peer reviewed/rewriting) 15%
Essay 2 (6-7 pages peer reviewed/rewriting) 20%
Essay 3 (6-7 pages) 20%
EUS 346 • Eastern Europe In The 20th Cen
36110 •
Spring 2010
Meets
TTH 330pm-500pm BUR 112
(also listed as
HIS 362G, REE 335 )
show description
HIS 362G
Spring 2010
Eastern Europe in the 20th Century
Tatjana Lichtenstein
Office: GAR 0.110
Email: tatjana.lichtenstein@mail.utexas.edu (preferred)
Phone: 512-475-6171
Class meets Tuesdays and Thursdays 3:30-5:00 pm in BUR 112
Course Description
In the twentieth century, Eastern Europe, a region which stretched from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Balkans in the south, became the site of many of Europe’s fiercest military and ideological struggles. In this period, the people of Eastern Europe experienced not only the horrors of two destructive world wars, but also the collapse of four empires, the rise of independent nation-states, the emergence of communism and fascism, the killing and relocation of entire populations, the establishment of socialist states, and the attempts to overcome the division between Europe’s East and West towards the end of century. In addition to secondary readings, wee will be exploring this turbulent period in the history of Eastern Europe through documents, memoirs, journalistic essays, and film.
Course Books
- Slavenka Drakuli?, How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed (New York: W.W. Norton, 1992)
- Heda Margolius Kovály, Under a Cruel Star: A Life in Prague, 1941-1968 (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1997)
- Joseph Rothschild and Nancy M. Wingfield, Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe since World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)
- Joe Sacco, Safe Area Goražde: The War in Eastern Bosnia, 1992-1995 (Fantagraphics Books, 2002)
- Gale Stokes, ed., From Stalinism to Pluralism: A Documentary History of Eastern Europe Since 1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
- Sylvia Welner and Kevin Welner, Small Doses of Arsenic: A Bohemian Woman’s Story of Survival (Hamilton Books, 2005)
Electronic Readings
Readings marked with * can be found on the course website on Blackboard (under Course Documents).
Please Note: Each week the assigned readings are organized into secondary and primary readings (see explanation below). These labels are meant to help you plan your work and do not denote which reading is more important.
secondary readings = background readings (secondary source materials)
primary readings = documents produced either at the time of a certain event or by people who experienced such events or episodes in the past (primary source materials)
Both secondary and primary readings are required.
On-Line Resources
- Integrated History: An Online Archive of Primary Sources on the History of East-Central Europe for Educators, Students and Scholars
http://www.einaudi.cornell.edu/europe/integrated_history/index.asp
- Making the History of 1989: The Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe
Assignments
The written assignments for this course consist of three short essays. In each essay, you will be asked to respond to specific questions about the reading as well as to connect the reading to the broader themes discussed in class. The due dates are listed below. The penalty for late essays is 3% per calendar day. Instructions for all three assignments can be found at the end of this syllabus (pages x-x).
Grades
Class Attendance and Participation (10%)
Map Quiz (5%) Feb 2
Response Essay (2 pages) (10%) Feb 11
In-Class Midterm (10%) Mar 9
Kovály Essay (3 pages) (20%) Apr 8
Drakuli? essay (3 pages) (20%) Apr 20
Final Exam (25%)
Schedule of Classes
Week 1
Jan 19 Introduction: Readings and Assignments
Jan 21 Eastern Europe Before WWI: Empires, States, and Peoples
secondary readings
*Maps Handout (these maps also the basis for the upcoming map quiz)
primary documents
*Harry De Windt, “Through Savage Europe,” 1907
Week 2
Jan 26 World War I in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
*Lonnie R. Johnson, Central Europe: Enemies, Neighbors, Friends (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 171-182
primary readings
*Fritz Kreisler, “Four Weeks in the Trenches,” 1915
Jan 28 Dislocations and revolutions
secondary readings
*Lonnie R. Johnson, Central Europe: Enemies, Neighbors, Friends, 182-196
primary readings
*American Jewish Relief Committee, “Report on Postwar Poland,” 1919
*Lewis Namier, “The Case of Bohemia,” 1917
Week 3
Feb 2 The End of War: Peace Settlements
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe Since World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 1-18 (“The Interwar Background”)
primary readings
Sylvia & Kevin Welner, eds., Small Doses of Arsenic: A Bohemian Woman’s Story of Survival (Hamilton Books, 2005), vii-viii (preface), 3-27
*“Czechoslovak Declaration of Independence Communicated to Washington, October 18, 1918” (From: Documents on the Founding of Czechoslovakia, 1918-1924)
Map Quiz
Feb 4 Minority Questions
secondary readings
Paul R. Magocsi, Historical Atlas of East Central Europe (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1993), 130-133 (Poland and Czechoslovakia), 134-137 (Hungary and Romania), and 138-141 (Yugoslavia)
primary readings
*R.J. Kerner on Conditions in Slovakia Part I & II, March 2 & March 1, 1919
Week 4
Feb 9 The New National Order Underway
secondary readings
*Re-read: Paul R. Magocsi, Historical Atlas of East Central Europe, 130-133 (Poland and Czechoslovakia)
primary readings
Small doses of Arsenic, 29-49
Feb 11 The New National Order Underway, II
secondary readings
* Re-read: Paul R. Magocsi, Historical Atlas of East Central Europe, 134-137 (Hungary and Romania), and 138-141 (Yugoslavia)
primary readings
Small Doses of Arsenic, 51-66
Small Doses of Arsenic Essay Due
Week 5
Feb 16 People without States – Roma and Jews
secondary readings
*Isabel Fonseca, Bury Me Standing: The Gypsies and their Journey (New York: Vintage, 1995), 83-112 (“Hindupen”)
*Paul R. Magocsi, A Historical Atlas of East Central Europe, 107-110
*“Yiddish: The Dialect of Ashkenazi Jewry,” in A Historical Atlas of the Jewish People, Eli Barnavi, ed. (New York: Schocken Books, 1992), 192-193
Feb 18 Authoritarianism in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
*Stephen Fischer-Galati, “Sources of Authoritarianism in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe,” 64-73, in Authoritarianism and Democracy in Europe, 1919-1939: Comparative Analysis, eds., Dirk Berg-Schlosser & Jeremy Mitchell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)
Week 6
Feb 23 Anti-Communism and Antisemitism
primary readings
*Excerpt, “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”
*Excerpt, Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (1925)
Feb 25 World War II in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 19-59 (“World War II”)
primary readings
*J. Noakes & G. Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3: Foreign Policy, War, and Racial Extermination (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2006), 1-8 (“Hitler’s Foreign Policy ‘Programme’”) & 135-136 (“Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact” (doc 543))
*Docs 3-11, in Lee Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front (Harlow: Pearson Logman, 2009)
Week 7
Mar 2 War and Genocide: The Holocaust in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
*J. Noakes & G. Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3, 441-467 (“The Persecution of the Jews, 1939-1941”) & 483-501 (“The Role of the Einsatzgruppen and Police Battalions”)
*Christopher R. Browning, “One Day in Józefów: Initiation to Mass Murder,” in Art from the Ashes: A Holocaust Anthology, ed. Lawrence L. Langer (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 95-105
In-Class Film Excerpt: The Pianist (dir. Roman Polanski, 2002)
Mar 4 Death Camps and Forced Labor
secondary readings
*J. Noakes & G. Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3, 544-600, 627-629 (“The Extermination Camps”)
primary readings
*Tadeusz Borowski, “This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen,” 29-49, in This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen (New York: Penguin Classics 1976)
Week 8
Mar 9 In-Class Midterm (materials from week 1 through 7)
Mar 11 Axis Allies and the Jewish Question
secondary readings
Rothschild &Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 30-34, 45-55 (reread)
SPRING BREAK
Week 9
Mar 23 Local Collaboration
secondary readings
*Jan T. Gross, Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland (New York: Penguin, 2001), 1-7, 30-42
Mar 25 The Memory of Collaboration and Resistance
secondary readings
*Tony Judt, “The Past Is Another Country: Myth and Memory in Postwar Europe,” in The Politics of Retribution in Europe: World War II and Its Aftermath, eds., István Deák, Jan T. Gross, and Tony Judt (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 293-323
primary readings
Small Doses of Arsenic, 66-76
In-Class Film Excerpt: The Shop on Main Street (Czechoslovakia, 1965)
Week 10
Mar 30 The End of War – Ethnic cleansing and Retribution
secondary readings
*Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave, 1986), 39-80, 89-128 (“War and Flight” & “Expulsion and Deportation”)
primary readings
Heda Margolius Kovaly, Under A Cruel Star: A Life in Prague, 1941-1968, 5-51
Apr 1 New Boundaries and Beginning of the Cold War
secondary readings
Lonnie R. Johnson, Central Europe, 223-248 (“Spheres of Influence II: East and West, or ‘Yalta Europe’”)
primary documents
Gales Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 12-27, 28-42
Heda Margolius Kovaly, Under a Cruel Star, 52-92
Week 11
Apr 6 The Socialist Order
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 61-99 (“The Communists Come to Power”)
primary readings
Gale Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 43-56
Heda Margolius Kovaly, Under a Cruel Star, 93-125
*M. Szymczyk, “Report on Young Women Workers in Poland,” 1952
Apr 8 Disciplining the Communist Bloc: Yugoslavia and Show Trials
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 101-117 (“The Dialectics of Stalinism and Titoism”)
primary readings
Gales Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 57-65, 66-77
Heda Margolius Kovaly, Under a Cruel Star, 126-192
Kovaly Essay due
Week 12
Apr 13 Resistance and Collaboration under Socialism
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 118-152 (“The Revenge of the Repressed”)
primary documents
Gale Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 80-93, 100-106, 122-134, 156-174
Apr 15 Everyday Life in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
*Essay on everyday life from “Making of 1989”
primary readings
*“Birth and Death in Romania,” New York Review of Books, October 23, 1986 (Making of 1989)
*“Vacations under Socialism,” (Romania, Making of 1989)
*“Women’s Reflections on Food Rationing in the 1980s,” (Romania, Making of 1989)
*“Women’s Reflections on Marital Relations under Socialism,” (Romania, Making of 1989)
*“Women’s Reflections on Work and Gender Relations under Socialism,” (Romania, Making of 1989)
Slavenka Drakuli?, How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed (all)
Week 13
Apr 20 The Collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 181-209 (“The Various Endgames”)
primary readings
Gale Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 188-203, 214-215, 242-253, 256-272.
*Documents on the revolution in Czechoslovakia (From: The Making of 1989)
Drakuli? Essay due
Apr 22 New Beginnings
secondary readings
*Tina Rosenberg, The Haunted Land: Facing Europe’s Ghosts After Communism (New York: Vintage, 1995), 3-42 (Czechoslovakia)
*Timothy Garton Ash, History of the Present: Essays, sketches, and Dispatches from Europe in the 1990s (New York: Random House, 2001), TBA
primary readings
*Vaclav Havel, “Independence Day Speech, 1990,” (Czechoslovakia, Making of 1989)
Week 14
Apr 27 The Breakup of Yugoslavia
secondary readings
*Norman M. Naimark, “The Wars of Yugoslav Succession,” 139-184, in Fires of Hatred: Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth Century Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002)
primary readings
Gale Stokes, From Stalinism to Pluralism, 273-288 (“The Collapse of Yugoslavia”)
*Excerpts from Children of Atlantis: Voices from the Former Yugoslavia (Budapest: CEU Press, 1995)
*Slavenka Drakuli?, “Overcome by Nationhood,” in Balkan Express: Fragments from the Other Side of War, TBA
Apr 29 Intimate Enemies
primary readings
Joe Sacco, Safe Area Gorazde: The War in Eastern Bosnia, 1992-1995 (all)
In-Class Film Excerpt: We Are All Neighbors (Bosnia/Britain, 1993)
Week 15
May 4 Becoming One Europe?
secondary readings
Rothschild & Wingfield, Return to Diversity, 211-243 (“The Return to Europe”)
In-Class Film Excerpt: Return to Europe (Erste Stiftung, 2008)
May 6 Exam Review
Course Policies
University of Texas Honor Code
The core values of The University of Texas at Austin are learning, discovery, freedom, leadership, individual opportunity, and responsibility. Each member of the university is expected to uphold these values through integrity, honesty, trust, fairness, and respect toward peers and community. Any student found guilty of scholastic dishonesty may receive an “F” in the course and will be remanded to the appropriate University of Texas authorities for disciplinary action. For more information, view Student Judicial Services at http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sjs.
A Note on the Use of Personal Electronic Devices
Individual students may be directed to turn off personal electronic devices if the devices are not being used for class purposes. If the student does not comply, the student may be asked to leave the classroom.
A Note on Classroom Behavior
You have the right to learn in every class you attend. But you have the responsibility to help assure that every other student shares that right. Specifically:
- Come to class on time. Do not leave early. These things are very disruptive. If you must come late or leave early, let the instructor know in advance and sit near the exit.
- Don't be disruptive during class. Don't chat with your neighbor. Don’t use your computer for anything else than taking notes or looking up course readings.
- Don't allow your electronic devices to be disruptive. Turn off your cell phone, beeper, and watch alarm.
- Participate.
Documented Disability Statement
The University of Texas at Austin provides upon request appropriate academic accommodations for qualified students with disabilities. For more information, contact Services for Students with Disabilities at 471-6259 (voice) or 232-2937 (video phone). It is you responsibility to inform me about any accommodations that you might need early on in the semester.
Grading Scale
94-100: A
90-93: A-
87-89: B+
84-86: B
80-83: B-
77-79: C+
74-76: C
70-73: C-
67-69: D+
64-66: D
60-63: D-
0-59: F
Instructions for Assignments
Format for written assignments:
- Typed, double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, numbered, stapled, and spell-checked
- You must footnote using the Chicago Style (style sheet will be posted on the course website). Do not use parenthetical or endnotes!
- Cover page with your name and essay title.
Submission:
- Hard copies only (your assignment is not considered submitted until you hand in a hard copy!)
- Assignments are due in class
- Late penalty is 3% per calendar day
Assignment # 1
Essay
Due: February 11, 2010
Length: Two, double-spaced pages
Sylvia and Kevin Welner, eds., Small Doses of Arsenic: A Bohemian Woman’s Story of Survival (Hamilton Books, 2005)
Small Doses of Arsenic is the memoir of Ton?a nee Drbohlavová, a woman born in Bohemia in 1905. Her recollections about her life are captured in a series of letters that she sent to her son who immigrated to the United States in 1969. She wrote the last letter shortly before she passed away in 2001.
Question for Analysis:
In chapters 1 through 6 (3-66) Ton?a describes her childhood and youth. What do we learn about the times in which she lived? Drawing on examples from these chapters write a two-page paper in which you address a particular theme such as education, work, family life, illness and death, religion, the significance of social divisions, gender roles (these are merely suggestions if there is another theme from the book that you would like to focus on for this assignment you can do so).
Once you have completed your essay, consider the following questions and bring your answers to class:
- What did you find most surprising about Ton?a’s experiences so far?
- What are the strengths and limitations of her memoir as a historical source?
Assignment # 2
Essay
Due: April 8, 2010
Length: Three, Double-spaced pages
Heda Margolius Kovály, Under a Cruel Star: A Life in Prague, 1941-1968 (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1997)
Questions for Analysis:
- According to Kovaly, how did the experiences of Czechs under Nazi occupation shape their responses to Communism after the war? How does she show connections between those two sets of events in her own life and in the attitudes and actions of those close to her? Does she depict the transition to Communism as a dramatic transformation of life in Czechoslovakia or as in key ways continuing developments from the period of the war?
- On page 62, Kovaly writes, “Sometimes evil intensions produce good results and good intensions produce the exact opposite—everything depends on the context.” What is she referring to? What does this statement reveal about her view of human nature and her understanding of history? Do you think she is right? Why or why not?
Assignment # 3
Essay
Due: April 20, 2010
Length: Three, Double-spaced pages
Slavenka Drakuli?, How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed (New York: W.W. Norton, 1992)
Question for Analysis:
Some scholars argue that it was the inability of the Communist regimes to provide their populations with basic amenities and consumer goods that first and foremost eroded their political legitimacy with ordinary men and women in Eastern Europe. Drawing on Slavenka Drakuli?’s memoir, How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed, discuss the validity of this argument.
EUS 346 • World War II In Eastern Eur-W
36142 •
Spring 2010
Meets
W 400pm-700pm GAR 2.124
(also listed as
HIS 350L, J S 364, REE 335 )
show description
HIS 350L/EUS346/JS364/REE335 Spring 2010
World War II in Eastern Europe
Tatjana Lichtenstein
Office: GAR 0.110
Office Hours: Th 5-7 pm
Email: tatjana.lichtenstein@mail.utexas.edu (preferred)
Phone: 512-475-6171
Class meets Wed 4-7 pm in GAR 2.124
Course Description
In Eastern Europe, the Second World War was, as the Czech Jewish woman Heda Margolius-Kovaly remarked, “a war no one had quite survived.” Wedged between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Empire, Eastern Europe was the site of unprecedented human and material destruction in the years between 1938 and 1948. As the staging ground for Hitler’s vision for a new racial order in Europe, the region was devastated by genocide and ethnic cleansing, programs of economic and social exploitation, and warfare. Using a wide variety of sources, this course will examine the war in Eastern Europe with a particular emphasis on occupation, collaboration, and resistance; the Holocaust; and the connection between ethnic cleansing, population transfer, and the establishment of Communism in postwar Eastern Europe.
Course Goals
- Explore the history of World War II in Eastern Europe
- Engage actively with the readings through participation in class discussion, submission of weekly questions in advance of the class, and through in-class writing exercises
- Write analytical, thesis-driven papers based on close reading of the course materials
Grading Policy
Participation (incl. final 3 page reflection essay) 25%
Map Quiz 5% (Jan 27)
Weekly Questions and In-Class Writing 5%
Document Analysis (2-3 pages) 10% (Feb 10)
Essay 1 (3-4 peer reviewed/rewriting) 15% (Mar 3)
Essay 2 (6-7 pages peer reviewed/rewriting) 20% (Mar 24)
Essay 3 (6-7 pages) 20% (Apr 21)
Course Books
Alan Adelson, ed., The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks from the ?ód? Ghetto (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
Lee Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front (New York: Pearson Longman, 2009)
Tadeusz Borowski, This Way for the Gas Ladies and Gentlemen (New York: Penguin Classics, 1976)
Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (New York: Harper Perennial, 1998)
Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)
Optional Books
Karel C. Berhoff, Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004)
Electronic Readings
Material marked with * are available on-line through the course website (under Course Documents).
Please Note: A guide to reading primary and secondary sources and formulating discussion questions can be found on pages 11-12 of this syllabus.
All readings and other course materials are required.
Assignments
The written assignments for this course consist of three analytical essays, one document analysis, and one reflection essay. In each paper, you will be asked to respond to a specific reading as well as to connect the reading to the broader themes discussed in class. The due dates are listed above. The penalty for late essays is 3% per calendar day. Instructions for all assignments can be found at the end of this syllabus (pages 8-10).
Schedule of Classes
Week 1
January 20 Introduction to the Course
Introduction to the class, readings, and assignments
In-Class Film Excerpt: The Nazis: A Warning from History (‘The Wrong War”)
Map Quiz Handout
Part 1: Contexts
Week 2
January 27 Setting the stage for German Expansion in the East (1938-1940)
Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front, 3-18 (incl. relevant documents mentioned in the main text)
*Geoffrey P. Megargee, “The Roots of the War of Annihilation,” 1-18, in War of Annihilation: Combat and Genocide on the Eastern Front, 1941 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007)
*“Hitler’s Foreign Policy Program,” 1-8, in J. Noakes & G. Pridham, eds, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3: Foreign Policy, War, and Racial Extermination (Exeter: Exeter University Press, 2006)
*Excerpt from Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (1925)
*The German-Soviet Non-Aggression Treaty, August 1939 (GHI Document)
Map Quiz
Week 3
February 3 1941: Operation Barbarossa and the Brutalization of Warfare
Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front, 18-56 (incl. relevant documents)
*Karel C. Berkhoff, “Soviet Ukraine and the Soviet Invasion,” in Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi rule, 6-34
*Commissar Order June 6, 1941
*Martin Bormann Minutes from Meeting July 16, 1941
*Indoctrination of the German Soldier: For Volk, Führer, and Fatherland”
*Vasily Grossman, “The Killing Grounds at Berdichev” 1944
Week 4
February 10 Nazi Rule in Eastern Europe and the End Game (1942-1945)
Baker, The Second World War on the Eastern Front, 57-107 (incl. documents)
*Ilya Ehrenburg, Excerpt from “Kill” (1942)
*William Hoffman, “Diary of a German Soldier”
*Affidavit of SS-Gruppenführer Otto Ohlendorf
*Governor General Hans Frank’s speech to his cabinet, Krakow, 16 December 1941
*Vasily Grossman, “Treblinka” (1944)
Document analysis due
Part 2: Themes
1: German Colonial Rule
Week 5
February 17 General Plan Ost – German Intentions in the East
*“The German Occupation of Poland,” 314-388, in Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3.
*“Internal Critique of Nazi Occupation Policy,” 304-308, in Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3.
*Karel C. Berkhoff, “Prisoners of War,” in Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule, 89-113
2: War and Genocide – The Holocaust
Week 6
February 24 A New Racial Order: Experiments in Brutality
*“The ‘Euthanasia’-programme, 1939-1945,” 389-440, in Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3.
*“The Persecution of the Jews, 1939-1941,” 441-464, & “”The Transition to the Systematic Extermination of the Jews,” 478-501, in Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3.
The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks from the ?ód? Ghetto, Foreword etc, 2-17, 19-74 (1st Notebook (June 28, 1939-December 31, 1939))
In-Class Film Excerpt: Ghetto Lodz (Alan Adelson, 1999)
Week 7
March 3 Ghettos
The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks from the ?ód? Ghetto (75-271)
*Dan Michman, “Jewish Leadership in Extremis,” 319-340, The Historiography of the Holocaust, Dan Stone ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004)
In-Class Film Excerpt: Ghetto Lodz (spring 1943 to August 1944)
Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak essay due in class (if you are not ready to submit it in class, then do not come to class)
Week 8
March 10 1941 and the Final Solution
Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (all)
SPRING BREAK
Week 9
March 24 Death Camps and Forced Labor
*“The Wannsee Conference on January 20, 1942 Concerning the ‘Final Solution’ of the Jewish Problem,” 533-543, & “The Extermination Camps,” 544-600, 610-629 in Noakes & Pridham, Nazism: A Documentary Reader.
Tadeusz Borowski, This way for the Gas Ladies and Gentlemen (all)
Ordinary Men paper due in class
3: Collaboration and Resistance
Week 10
March 31 Collaboration
*Benjamin Frommer, “Denouncers and Fraternizers: Gender, Collaboration, and Retribution in Bohemia and Moravia during WWII and After,” 111-132, in Gender and War in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe, eds. Nancy M. Wingfield & Maria Bucur (Bloomington: Inidiana University Press, 2006)
*Jan Gross, Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland, 1-7, 30-42
In-Class Film Excerpt: The Shop on Main Street (Czechoslovakia, 1965)
Week 11
April 7 Resistance: Partisans
*“Deportations and Forced Migrations,” & “Toward the End of Nazi rule,” in Karel C. Berkhoff, Harvest of Despair, 253-304
*Ben Shepherd, War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004), 108-128, 188-234
In-Class Film Excerpt: War of the Century: When Hitler Fought Stalin (Partisans in Belorussia)
Part 3: End of War and the Memory of World War II in Eastern Europe
Week 12
April 14 Creating the Postwar Order
*“Timothy Snyder, “’To Resolve the Ukrainian Question Once and For All’: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ukrainians in Poland, 1943-1947,” Journal of Cold War Studies vol. 1, no. 2 June 1999): 86-120
*Radio Documentary: “Red Runs the Vistula: The Warsaw Uprising of 1944,” American Public Media/BBC (about 50 min)
http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/warsaw/
*Stefan Korbonski, ”Warsaw Uprising” (Excerpt from The Underground State: A Guide to the Underground, 1939-1945), 187-193
In-Class Film Excerpt: The Pianist (Roman Polanski, 2002)
Week 13
April 21 Retribution Against the Germans of Eastern Europe
Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (all)
A Terrible Revenge paper due in class (if you are not ready to submit, then do not come to class)
Week 14
April 28 Jews and the End of War in Eastern Europe
*Jan T. Gross, “Introduction,” and “The Unwelcoming of Jewish Survivors,” in Fear: Antisemitism in Poland after Auschwitz: An Essay in Historical Interpretation (New York: Random House, 2006), ix-xv, 31-80.
*“The Victory,” in Henryk Grynberg, The Jewish War and The Victory (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2001), 61-153.
*Piotr Wrobel, “Double Memory: Poles ands Jews After the Holocaust,” East European Politics and Societies vol. 11, no. 3 (Fall 1997), 560-574.
Week 15
May 5 WWII and Postwar Communism
*Jan T. Gross, “War as Revolution,” 17-40, in The Establishment of Communist Regimes in Eastern Europe, eds. Norman M. Naimark & Leonid Gibianski (New York: Westview Press, 1997)
*Heda Margolius Kovály, Under a Cruel Star: A Life in Prague, 1941-1968 (Holmes & Meier, 1986), 39-74
*Tony Judt, “From the House of the Dead: An Essay on Modern European Memory,” 803-831, in Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945 (New York: Penguin, 2006)
Final Assignment due May 12 in my office before 5 pm.
Course Policies
University of Texas Honor Code
The core values of The University of Texas at Austin are learning, discovery, freedom, leadership, individual opportunity, and responsibility. Each member of the university is expected to uphold these values through integrity, honesty, trust, fairness, and respect toward peers and community. Any student found guilty of scholastic dishonesty may receive an “F” in the course and will be remanded to the appropriate University of Texas authorities for disciplinary action. For more information, view Student Judicial Services at http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sjs.
A Note on the Use of Personal Electronic Devices
Individual students may be directed to turn off personal electronic devices if the devices are not being used for class purposes. If the student does not comply, the student may be asked to leave the classroom.
A Note on Classroom Behavior
You have the right to learn in every class you attend. But you have the responsibility to help assure that every other student shares that right. Specifically:
- Come to class on time. Do not leave early. These things are very disruptive. If you must come late or leave early, let the instructor know in advance and sit near the exit.
- Don't be disruptive during class. Don't chat with your neighbor. Don’t use your computer for anything else than taking notes or looking up course readings.
- Don't allow your electronic devices to be disruptive. Turn off your cell phone, beeper, and watch alarm.
- Participate. Don’t let your electronic device act as an inhibitor to class room participation. If I am not satisfied with your involvement in the class, you might be asked to stop using your laptop or other electronic device.
Documented Disability Statement
The University of Texas at Austin provides upon request appropriate academic accommodations for qualified students with disabilities. For more information, contact Services for Students with Disabilities at 471-6259 (voice) or 232-2937 (video phone). It is you responsibility to inform me about any accommodations that you might need early on in the semester.
Grading Scale
94-100: A
90-93: A-
87-89: B+
84-86: B
80-83: B-
77-79: C+
74-76: C
70-73: C-
67-69: D+
64-66: D
60-63: D-
0-59: F
Instructions for Assignments
Format for written assignments
- Typed, double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, numbered, stapled, and spell-checked
- You must footnote using the Chicago Style (style sheet will be posted on the course website). Do not use parenthetical or endnotes!
- Cover page with your name and essay title.
Submission
- Hard copies only (your assignment is not considered submitted until you hand in a hard copy!)
- Assignments are due in class
- Late penalty is 3% per calendar day
- Essay no. 1 and 2 are peer-reviewed assignments. When you submit these assignments, you must provide a copy both for me and your peer reviewer (you will be assigned a peer reviewer in class)
Assignment # 1
Document Analysis
Due: February 10, 2010
Length: 2-3 pages
This assignment asks you to read a primacy source and analyze its content and significance. The document in question is the so-called “Jäger Report.” Imagine you are a historian who comes across this document in the archives. You begin the process of figuring out what the significance is of the evidence you have before you. Here are some questions that should help you in your analysis:
- Who was the author and when was it written? Who do you think is the recipient? Why was the document produced?
- What is the content of the document? What does the information contained in the document tell you about events that have already taken place and ones that are unfolding?
- What do you learn about the author from the document? What are his motivations for producing the document?
When doing this assignment it is important that you read the document very closely. Pay attention to dates and to shifts in emphasis. The details are very significant when reading sources like this one. In order to discover the document’s many layers, you will have to read it several times and work closely with the text when undertaking your analysis. Your work should be based on your reading of the source and your own analysis of it: do not do additional research or use reviews or summaries written by other people.
Assignment # 2
Essay no. 1
Due: March 3, 2010
Length: 3-4 pages
This assignment is a response to The Diary of Dawid Sierakowiak: Five Notebooks from the ?ód? Ghetto. What do we learn about life in the ghetto from reading Dawid’s diary? Drawing on examples from the diary discuss one of the following themes in a 3-4-page essay: strategies of survival; resistance; food and social control; and social divisions within the ghetto and their significance (these are merely suggestions. If there is another theme from the book that you would like to focus on for this assignment you can do so although you should have your idea approved by me in advance of writing the essay). Your work should be based on your reading of the book and your own analysis of it: do not do additional research or use reviews or summaries written by other people.
Once you have completed your essay, consider the following questions and bring your answers to class:
- What did you find most surprising about Dawid’s experiences?
- What are the strengths and limitations of his diary as a historical source?
Submission:
Bring two hard copies of your essay to class, one for me and one for your peer reviewer.
Assignment # 3
Essay no. 2
Due: March 24, 2010
Length: 6-7 pages
This assignment is a response to the book by Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. Your work should be based on your reading of the book and your own analysis of it: do not do additional research or use reviews or summaries written by other people.
In six to seven, double-spaced pages, address the following questions:
I. List five useful historical facts you learned from reading this book. These facts should be straightforward pieces of information that can be stated briefly. An example might be an important statistic about the German Order Police in Poland that you had not known before or the date of a central event in the history of the Holocaust.
II. Choose a short quotation (two or three sentences) from the book that you consider especially significant. In one page explain how the passage you selected reflects a major argument or central contribution of Browning's book. Be sure to provide the quotation and the page on which it appears.
III. Write four to five pages in which you analyze one of the main points of Browning’s book. Be sure to identify the theme or argument you will discuss and explain how it fits into Browning’s work as a whole. How does he support his claim? What is noteworthy about the kind of evidence he presents and the ways he interprets it? Why did this particular aspect of the book strike you as significant? What kinds of positions does Browning seem to be countering or correcting? Is he convincing? Why or why not?
Submission:
Bring two hard copies of your essay to class, one for me and one for your peer reviewer.
Assignment # 4
Essay no. 3
Due: April 21, 2010
Length: 6-7 pages
In his study of ethnic cleansing in Europe, the historian Norman Naimark noted about the expulsion on Germans from Poland and Czechoslovakia following World War II:
“In some fashion, then, it is fair to say that the Germans reaped what they sowed. That so many lives were lost and ruined in the ethnic cleansing of the Germans from East Central Europe should be attributed, in the final analysis, to the hatred wrought by Nazi policy in the region.”
Drawing on Alfred-Maurice de Zayas’ A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, as well as other course materials discuss Naimark’s assertion. Do you agree or disagree? Your work should be based on your reading of the book and other course materials and your own analysis of it: do not do additional research or use reviews or summaries written by other people.
(Source: Norman M. Naimark, Fires of Hatred: Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth Century Europe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002), 136)
Assignment # 5
Reflection Essay
Due: May 12, 2010
Length: 3 pages
In this assignment, you will be asked to state your informed opinion about the significance of the study of the Second World War in Eastern Europe for your understanding of history more broadly. While I am asking for your opinion, I want you to form one based on the course readings and discussions we have had in the course of the semester. You should use these materials as evidence to support your statements. In a three-page essay reflect on the following questions:
1. What aspect of World War II covered in this seminar did you find to be the most interesting? Explain why.
2. Do you think the study of WWII in Eastern Europe can provide us with universal insights (not dependent on time and place) into human behavior or were people’s responses dependent on their specific contexts? Explain why.
Reading Primary Sources and Sources
&
Preparing Discussion Questions
A Brief Guide
How to approach a primary source?
Author
- Who was the author?
- When was it written? What is the context for the production of the document?
Purpose or Message
- Why was the document produced and why has it survived?
- Is the author simply providing information or trying to lead the audience to a particular conclusion?
- What kind of evidence does the author introduce to support a thesis or a claim in the source? Why was this evidence chosen?
Point of View
- All authors have biases, prejudices, and assumptions that influence their perspective or point of view!
- What background factors might influence the author’s point of view?
- Is the author trustworthy? How do you know?
Audience
- Who was the intended audience for this document?
Tone and Language
- What is the tome of the source? What is the author’s attitude toward the subject?
- Is there a single tone employed throughout the document or does it vary from part to part?
Significance
- How does the source help explain the event or topic being explored? Could the event or issue be explained as fully without the document?
- Does the source offer unique insights or alternative information about the topic?
- Is the explanation or interpretation in this document different from others?
- What does it being to light about a certain historical period or event?
How to approach a secondary source?
- Begin by reading the introduction and conclusion.
- Understanding the thesis and the major conclusions drawn from the study will act as a spine holding together all the information you are about to receive in the main body of the text. You can also think of the introduction and the conclusion as a road map guiding you through the facts and evidence being presented.
- Evaluate the arguments and the evidence critically—is it convincing why or why not?
- Read for historical context i.e. learn about the past
- Read for historiographical context i.e. understand how interpretation of the past have evolved
When preparing discussion questions:
- Once you have read the sources well, think about what you want to get across in the discussion. How do the sources relate to and/or contradict each other?
- Think about the types of sources we are reading.
- Ask open-ended questions and keep in mind that good discussion questions go beyond asking people to recall details from the text but require knowledge of the text’s contents to be answered well. Your questions should elicit answers that are historical and analytical, not simply opinions. For example, a question that points to a possible contradiction within the text and asks your colleagues to assess whether that contradiction undermines the author’s argument could stimulate an informed exchange of views and generate knowledge about the text and the history it treats. A question that asks how readers feel about some of the issues the author examines would not be likely to accomplish those goals.


