Wordmarks for UT and College of Liberal Arts

Winfred P. Lehmann, Director :: PCL 5.112, 1 University Station S5490 :: Austin, TX 78712 :: 512-471-4566

Language Systems Indices

Indo-European Typology Project

Keyword Index

GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY

aspect

Kennard, Edward. 1936. Mandan Grammar. International Journal of Linguistics 9. New York : Columbia University Press. (citation record)
Regamey, Constantin. 1954. A propos de la construction ergative en indo-aryen moderne. In: Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung. Festschrift Albert Debrunner. Bern: Francke. 363-381. (citation record)
Lyons, John. 1967. A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences. In: Foundations of Language 3. 390-396. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1973. Transitiv und Intransitiv. Akten der IV. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Reichert. 108-124. (citation record)
Klimov, Georgij A. 1974. On the Character of Languages of Active Typology.Linguistics 131. 11-25. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1974. Das Verbum im Keltischen: sprachgeschichtliche Grundlagen und typologische Entwicklung. In: Zeitschrift fuer Celtische Philologie 33. 28-44. (citation record)
Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55. 59-138. (citation record)
Plank, Frans. 1979. Ergativity, Syntactic typology and Universal Grammar: Some past and present viewpoints. In: Ergativity. Frans Plank, ed. New York: Academic Press. (citation record)
Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. Frans Planck, ed.London: Academic Press. 385-404. (citation record)
Bossong, Georg. 1980. Syntax und Semantik der Fundamentalrelation. Das Guarani als Sprache des aktiven Typus. Lingua 50. 359-379. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1980. Zur Typologie des Vorindogermanischen. In: Linguistic Reconstruction and Indo-European Syntax. Paolo Ramat, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 91-112. (citation record)
Drossard, Werner. 1984. Das Tagalog als Repräsentant des aktivischen Sprachbaus. Tübingen: Narr. (citation record)
Rumsey, Alan. 1987. The Chimera of Proto-Indo-European Ergativity. Lingua 71: 297-318. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1989. Earlier Stages of Proto-Indo-European.Indogermanica: Festschrift fuer Wolfgang Meid zum 60. Geburtstag am 12. 11. 1989. Ed. Karin Heller, Oswald Panagl, and Johann Tischler. Graz. Pp. 109-131. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1989. Problems in Indo-European Grammar: Residues from Pre-Indo-European Active Structure. General Linguistics 29. 228-246. (citation record)
Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The Origin of Split-Ergativity. In: Language 66. 261-296. (citation record)
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/Agentive Case Marking and its Motivations. Language 67. 510-546. (citation record)
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1993. Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. (citation record)
Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies 21. 303-329. (citation record)
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1995. Residues of Pre-Indo-European Active Structure and their Implications for the Relationships among the Dialects. Innsbrucker Beitraege zur Sprachwissenschaft 61. Innsbruck. (citation record)
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 1997. Nominal Syntax in Italic: A Diachronic Perspective. Language Change and Functional Explanations. Ed. Jadranka Gvozdanovic. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 273-301. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1997. Active Language Characteristics in Pre-Indo-European and Pre-Afro-Asiatic. General Linguistics 35. 51-79. (citation record)
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 1999. Impersonal Habet Constructions in Latin: At the Crossroads of Indo-European Innovation. Language Change and Typological Variation: In Honor of Winfred P. Lehmann on the Occasion of his 83rd Birthday. Vol II. Grammatical Universals and Typology. Journal of Indo-European Studies. Monograph 31. 590-612. (citation record)