Wordmarks for UT and College of Liberal Arts

Winfred P. Lehmann, Director :: PCL 5.112, 1 University Station S5490 :: Austin, TX 78712 :: 512-471-4566

Language Systems Indices

Indo-European Typology Project

Keyword Index

PARTS OF SPEECH

pronoun

Sapir, Edward. 1917a. Review of C.C. Uhlenbeck: Het passive karacter van het verbum transitivum of van het verbum actionis in talen van Noordamerika. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 86-90. (citation record)
Sapir, Edward. 1917b. Review of C.C. Uhlenbeck: Het identificerend karakter der possessieve flexie in talen van Noord-Amerika. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 86-90. (citation record)
Brugmann, Karl von. 1925. Die Syntax des Einfachen Satzes im Indogermanischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. (citation record)
Brandenstein, Wilhelm. 1928. Das Problem der Impersonalien. In: Indogermanische Forschungen 46. 2-27. (citation record)
Hoijer, Harry. 1954. The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. In: The American Anthropologist 56. Language in Culture. Proceedings of a Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture. 92-105 (citation record)
Drexler, Hans. 1962. Ueber Gerundium und Gerundivum. In: Gymnasium 69. 429-460. (citation record)
Kuiper, Aert. 1968. The Categories Verb - Noun and Transitive - Intransitive in English and Squamish. Lingua 21. 610- 626. (citation record)
Klimov, Georgij A. 1974. On the Character of Languages of Active Typology.Linguistics 131. 11-25. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1974. Das Verbum im Keltischen: sprachgeschichtliche Grundlagen und typologische Entwicklung. In: Zeitschrift fuer Celtische Philologie 33. 28-44. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1976. Der Beitrag der keltiberischen Inschrift von Botorrita zur Rekonstruktion der Protokeltischen Syntax. Word 28: 51-62. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1977. Probleme der Ergativkonstruktion. In: Muenchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 36. 97-116. (citation record)
Klimov, Georgij A. 1979. On the Position of the Ergative Type in Typological Classification. Ergativity: Towards a Theory ofGrammatical Relations. Frans Plank, ed. New York: Academic Press. 327-332. (citation record)
Pirejko, L.A. 1979. On the Genesis of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian. Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations.Frans Plank, ed. Academic Press: New York/London. 481-488. (citation record)
Plank, Frans. 1979. Ergativity, Syntactic typology and Universal Grammar: Some past and present viewpoints. In: Ergativity. Frans Plank, ed. New York: Academic Press. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1979. Reconstructing Active and Ergative Stages of Pre-Indo-European. In: Frans Plank, ed. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Academic Press. 333-345. (citation record)
Bossong, Georg. 1980. Syntax und Semantik der Fundamentalrelation. Das Guarani als Sprache des aktiven Typus. Lingua 50. 359-379. (citation record)
Körner, Karl-Hermann. 1985. Die zwei Positionen der Romania auf der Skalaakkusativisch-ergativisch. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur typologischen Klassifizierung der romanischen Sprachen. Franz Plank, ed. Relational Typology 1987. Systematic Balance in Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 91-94. (citation record)
Rumsey, Alan. 1987. The Chimera of Proto-Indo-European Ergativity. Lingua 71: 297-318. (citation record)
Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The Origin of Split-Ergativity. In: Language 66. 261-296. (citation record)
Nichols, Johanna. 1990. Some Preconditions and Typical Traits of the Stative-Active Language Type with Reference to Indo-European. In: Language Typology 1987. Systematic Balance in Language. Winfred P. Lehmann, ed. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 95-113. (citation record)
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/Agentive Case Marking and its Motivations. Language 67. 510-546. (citation record)
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1992. Contributions from New Data to the Reconstruction of the Proto-Language. In: Edgar Polomé and Werner Winter, eds. Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 35-62. (citation record)
Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies 21. 303-329. (citation record)
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1994. Person Marking in Indo-European. Historische Sprachforschung 107. 1-11. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1997. Active Language Characteristics in Pre-Indo-European and Pre-Afro-Asiatic. General Linguistics 35. 51-79. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1997. Early Celtic among the Indo-European Dialects. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie 49-50. 440-454. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1997. Frozen Residues and Relative Dating. Varia on the Indo-European Past: Papers in Memory of Marija Gimbutas. Eds. Miriam Robbins Dexter and Edgar C. Polome. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 19. Washington D.C. Pp. 221-246. (citation record)
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. South Asian Languages and Linguistic Typology. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1998. 237-246. (citation record)
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1998. Implications of Agreement Languages for Linguistics. Notes on Linguistics 82. 1-5. (citation record)
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 1999. Impersonal Habet Constructions in Latin: At the Crossroads of Indo-European Innovation. Language Change and Typological Variation: In Honor of Winfred P. Lehmann on the Occasion of his 83rd Birthday. Vol II. Grammatical Universals and Typology. Journal of Indo-European Studies. Monograph 31. 590-612. (citation record)