Wordmarks for UT and College of Liberal Arts

Winfred P. Lehmann, Director :: PCL 5.112, 1 University Station S5490 :: Austin, TX 78712 :: 512-471-4566

Language Systems Indices

Indo-European Typology Project

Keyword Index

SYNTAX

object

Sapir, Edward. 1917a. Review of C.C. Uhlenbeck: Het passive karacter van het verbum transitivum of van het verbum actionis in talen van Noordamerika. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 86-90. (citation record)
Sapir, Edward. 1917b. Review of C.C. Uhlenbeck: Het identificerend karakter der possessieve flexie in talen van Noord-Amerika. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 86-90. (citation record)
Brugmann, Karl von. 1925. Die Syntax des Einfachen Satzes im Indogermanischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co. (citation record)
Brandenstein, Wilhelm. 1928. Das Problem der Impersonalien. In: Indogermanische Forschungen 46. 2-27. (citation record)
Hoijer, Harry. 1954. The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. In: The American Anthropologist 56. Language in Culture. Proceedings of a Conference on the Interrelations of Language and Other Aspects of Culture. 92-105 (citation record)
Regamey, Constantin. 1954. A propos de la construction ergative en indo-aryen moderne. In: Sprachgeschichte und Wortbedeutung. Festschrift Albert Debrunner. Bern: Francke. 363-381. (citation record)
Drexler, Hans. 1962. Ueber Gerundium und Gerundivum. In: Gymnasium 69. 429-460. (citation record)
Laroche, E. 1962. Un ergative en indo-européen d'Asie Mineure. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 57. 23-43. (citation record)
Lyons, John. 1967. A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences. In: Foundations of Language 3. 390-396. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1976. Der Beitrag der keltiberischen Inschrift von Botorrita zur Rekonstruktion der Protokeltischen Syntax. Word 28: 51-62. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1977. Probleme der Ergativkonstruktion. In: Muenchner Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 36. 97-116. (citation record)
Pirejko, L.A. 1979. On the Genesis of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian. Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations.Frans Plank, ed. Academic Press: New York/London. 481-488. (citation record)
Plank, Frans. 1979. Ergativity, Syntactic typology and Universal Grammar: Some past and present viewpoints. In: Ergativity. Frans Plank, ed. New York: Academic Press. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1979. Reconstructing Active and Ergative Stages of Pre-Indo-European. In: Frans Plank, ed. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Academic Press. 333-345. (citation record)
Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations. Frans Planck, ed.London: Academic Press. 385-404. (citation record)
Bossong, Georg. 1980. Syntax und Semantik der Fundamentalrelation. Das Guarani als Sprache des aktiven Typus. Lingua 50. 359-379. (citation record)
Körner, Karl-Hermann. 1985. Die zwei Positionen der Romania auf der Skalaakkusativisch-ergativisch. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur typologischen Klassifizierung der romanischen Sprachen. Franz Plank, ed. Relational Typology 1987. Systematic Balance in Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 91-94. (citation record)
Coleman, Robert. 1989. The Rise and Fall of Absolute Constructions: A Latin Case History. In: Subordination and Other Topics in Latin. Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1-5. April 1985. (citation record)
Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The Origin of Split-Ergativity. In: Language 66. 261-296. (citation record)
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1992. Contributions from New Data to the Reconstruction of the Proto-Language. In: Edgar Polomé and Werner Winter, eds. Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 35-62. (citation record)
Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies 21. 303-329. (citation record)
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (citation record)
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. South Asian Languages and Linguistic Typology. Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1998. 237-246. (citation record)