Katherine Bersch. Comparative Politics / Methodology. Thesis: When Democracies Deliver: Governance Reforms in Latin America (Weyland, Hunter, Jones, Brinks, Bussell). My dissertation, “When Democracies Deliver: Governance Reform in Latin America,” assesses two competing approaches to reforming public administration. The results of eighteen months of field research in Argentina and Brazil suggest that the approach embraced by many Latin American policymakers and international organizations—namely, swift, wholesale reform pushed through during “windows of opportunity”—does not tend to produce effective and lasting improvements. By contrast, I find that incremental changes sequenced over time are more promising, because they allow for modifications and corrections along the way and do not depend on finding the right solution ex ante, a notoriously difficult task in the complex world of policymaking. In addition, I examine the influence of different governing patterns on Brazilian and Argentine policymakers’ decisions to either embark on sweeping transformations or proceed more gradually. While Argentina’s executive power is concentrated in single-party cabinets, facilitating large-scale change, Brazil’s multi-party presidentialism frustrates “big bang” reform attempts. Yet, the absence of repeated overhauls provides opportunities for technical experts within the Brazilian government to gradually advance individually small but often cumulatively significant changes. Paradoxically, the dissertation argues, political-organizational contexts that hinder grand reform attempts may nonetheless facilitate greater long-term success. Education: PhD, University of Texas- Austin, Government (Expected Spring 2015); BA, University Notre Dame (2004). Publications: Comparative Politics (forthcoming); European Journal of Development Research (2014); Information Polity (2013) External Awards: National P.E.O. Scholar Award (2014-15); Dwight Eisenhower-Roberts Graduate Fellowship (2013-14); David Boren National Security Education Program (NSEP) Fellowship (2011-12); Fulbright IIE Fellowship (2007) Select Internal Awards: Named/Endowed Continuing Fellowship (University-wide competition; 2013-2014); Graduate School Continuing Fellowship (Fa 2012; Sp 2014); Macdonald Summer Research Fellowship (2012); Long Dissertation Fellowship (declined; 2011); John J. Kennedy Prize for best thesis on Latin America, University of Notre Dame (2004). Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, Latin American Politics, Political Economy, Comparative Public Policy, Research Methods, Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis, Conceptualization and Measurement. Email: katherine.bersch [at] utexas.edu. Web: www.berschkatherine.com.
Steven Brooke. Comparative Politics/ Middle East Politics/ International Relations. Thesis: Clients of Islam: The Politics of Islamist Social Service Provision in Egypt (Brownlee, Elkins, R. Moser, Tarek Masoud).My dissertation project considers the conditions under which non-state actors deliver social services, with a focus on the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. I structure the dissertation around three interlocking questions: why does the Brotherhood provide services in certain areas and pass other areas over? What are the effects of this social service provision on patterns of sociopolitical mobilization? And what is the causal pathway through which social service provision influences a recipient’s beliefs and behaviors? I investigate these questions with multiple methods, including ArcGIS mapping, a survey experiment of 3600 Egyptians, fieldwork and interviews at Islamic charities, and an array of Arabic language materials. A closer consideration of the electoral influence of Islamist social service provision, I argue, helps to explain both the Brotherhood’s growing appeal under Hosni Mubarak and the group’s impressive but ultimately unstable political tenure in the post-Mubarak period. Not only does this project add rich empirical detail to the much discussed but little understood phenomenon of Islamic groups’ social service networks, it generates broader theoretical insights into opposition activism in authoritarian regimes, the relationship between of social service provision and political attitudes, and how Islamist groups mobilize supporters. Education: B.A., James Madison University (Harrisonburg, VA), Majors in International Affairs and History; M.A. in Middle Eastern History, George Mason University (Fairfax, VA); M.A., Government, University of Texas- Austin; PhD, University of Texas- Austin, Government, Expected Summer 2015. Awards: University of Texas Continuing Fellowship, Summer 2014; University of Texas Named Continuing Fellowship, Academic Year 2013-2014; Smith Richardson Foundation World Politics and Statecraft Fellowship, Spring/Summer 2013; U.S. Institute of Peace Jennings-Randolph Dissertation Fellowship, Academic Year 2012-2013; David Boren National Security Education Program (NSEP) Fellowship, Academic Year 2012-2013 (declined); Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship- Arabic, 2011-2012 Academic Year; FLAS Fellowship- Arabic, 2010-2011 Academic Year; FLAS Fellowship- Arabic, Summer 2010; Critical Language Scholarship- Arabic, Summer 2010 (declined); FLAS Fellowship- Arabic, 2009-2010 Academic Year. Publications: Terrorism and Political Violence, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Foreign Affairs, Middle East Report. Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics; Middle East Politics; Islamist Movements; Terrorism, Insurgency, and Civil War; Qualitative Research Methods. Email: sbrooke(at)gmail.com. Website: www.steventbrooke.com.
Danilo Antonio Contreras. Comparative Politics / International Relations. Thesis: Nation Before Pigmentation: Race and Electoral Politics in the Dominican Republic (Madrid). My dissertation examines the effect of race on electoral politics in the Dominican Republic. I challenge the assumption that high levels of racial stratification necessarily create strong racial group identities and that these identities are activated in elections. I argue that stratification may actually undermine the activation of racial cleavages in elections by discouraging identification with marginalized racial groups. I also contend that nation-building efforts may prevent the formation of strong racial identities and suppress the electoral activation of racial cleavages. I support my argument with a combination of qualitative data and quantitative data collected over a period of eight months of field research in the Dominican Republic. My dissertation helps to explain why ethnic voting and parties may be relatively rare in regions with high stratification but inchoate racial group identity. Academic Appointments: Gaius Charles Bolin Fellow in Political Science, Williams College (Currently). Education: Ph.D. Candidate, University of Texas at Austin (expected spring, 2014); BA, Government, Spanish, Georgetown University (2005). Awards: Malcolm MacDonald Fellowship (Summer, 2013); IC2 Institute Fieldwork Grant (2011); US Department of Education Foreign Language and Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship (summer, 2010); Tinker Foundation Travel Grant (summer, 2009); NSF EDGE-SBE Fellowship (2009-2010; 2007-2008). Publications: Article manuscript under review at Latin American Research Review. Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics; Race and Ethnic Politics in Latin America and the Caribbean; Latin American Politics; US-Latin American Relations; Latino Politics; Dominico-Haitian Politics. Email: email@example.com, Web Profile: http://links.utexas.edu/cwlfwhg.
Kai-Ping Huang. Comparative Politics / Methodology. Thesis: Electoral Reforms and the Transformation of Party System: Thailand in Comparative Perspective (Moser, Lin, Maclachlan, Shaw, Boone, Jones). My dissertation argues that different party structures, when interacting with electoral systems of approval voting (AV) and single-member district (SMD), lead to different levels of party system fragmentation. In a weak party structure, elite action is the key to explain the different outcomes: AV tends to inflate the number of parties as the rule poses an obstacle to intra-district party coordination. But this major obstacle is removed under SMD, which tends to result in lower fragmentation. By contrast, the role of voters becomes active in a strong party structure and, therefore, the effects of AV and SMD on party system fragmentation becomes similar as both tend to bring down the number of parties through voters’ strategic behavior. This dissertation tests the theory on Thailand since the country has gone through three waves of electoral reform in which it provides a quasi-experimental setting conducive for inspecting the effects of the key factors on party system fragmentation when other confounding variables are controlled for. This dissertation applies multi-methods, including case study, single-country multi-level quantitative analysis, and a large N, cross-national quantitative analysis, to reach the conclusions. I conducted fieldwork in Thailand in 2012 to collect electoral data and documents related to the three electoral reforms. Education: PhD in Government, (expected December 2014), The University of Texas at Austin; M.A. and B.A. in International Relations, National Cheng-chi University, Taiwan, 2000, 1997. Awards: MacDonald Tuition Award (2012-13), Bruton Student Endowment Fellowships (2012), MacDonald Fellowship (2008-9), The University of Texas at Austin; Study Abroad Award (2012-14), Ministry of Education of Taiwan. Publications: Taiwan Journal of Democracy (2013), book chapter in The Election of 2011, White Lotus Press (forthcoming), two articles under review in peer-reviewed journals. Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, Comparative Political and Formal Institutions, Comparative Political Parties and Party Systems, East and Southeast Asian Politics, Quantitative and Research Methods. Email: kaipingH@utexas.edu.
Riitta-Ilona Koivumaeki. Comparative Politics / International Relations. Thesis: Institutional Constraints on Economic Nationalism in Latin America (Weyland, Chapman, Elkins, Lin, McDonald). My dissertation examines the politics of economic nationalism in contemporary Latin America. Specifically, I evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) which were adopted in the region during the Washington Consensus to prevent nationalization of foreign property in the future. The first part of the dissertation analyzes whether the treaties have succeeded in deterring expropriation of multinational corporations. My quantitative analysis of state takeovers in the region in 1985-2012 shows that the treaties have proven to be surprisingly weak: unlike other components of the liberal world order, such as democratic institutions and dollarization, BITs have not constrained nationalistic executives from attacking foreign investors. The second part of the project explores the causal mechanisms behind the treaties’ weakness. I argue that commodity booms allow governments to cover the costs of expropriating BIT-protected investment. I assess the argument with a paired comparison of the recent oil & gas reforms in Venezuela and Bolivia. The case studies are based on 130 in-depth interviews and other qualitative material I collected in the field in 2012-2013. Education: PhD in Government, (expected Summer 2015); M.A. in Latin American Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, 2009; B.Soc.Sci., University of Tampere, Finland, 2007. Awards: Graduate School Continuing Fellowship, The University of Texas at Austin (Summer 2014), Macdonald Dissertation Fellowship, The University of Texas at Austin (academic year 2012-2013), Tinker Summer Field Research Grant, The University of Texas at Austin (Summer 2011, Summer 2010). Publications: Comparative Politics (forthcoming), Journal of Politics in Latin America (2010), book chapter in Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal and Juan Pablo Luna (eds.), The Resilience of the Latin American Right, Johns Hopkins University Press (2014), Debates IESA (with Pedro Luis Rodríguez Sosa, forthcoming). Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, International Relations, Latin American Politics, Comparative and International Political Economy, International Institutions, Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Website: https://sites.google.com/a/utexas.edu/rik/.
Jonathan J. Kinkel. Comparative Politics / Public Law. Thesis: High-End Demand: How Markets for Legal Services in Urban China Create Pressure for Judicial Autonomy (Brinks, Hurst, Perry, Elkins, Maclachlan, Boone). My research is situated within the fields of comparative politics and contemporary Chinese politics, with a substantive interest in comparative judicial behavior. My dissertation addresses the specific mechanisms linking economic development, judicial autonomy, and the rule of law. Using the subnational comparative method, I closely examine three urban court case studies (Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Chengdu) in authoritarian China, tracing locally specific variations in judicial autonomy to differences in the size of local markets for professional legal services. These three case studies all exhibit relatively high levels of economic development, resulting in a “most similar systems” comparison that controls not only for country-level variation, but also for many other social and institutional differences that exist between urban and rural localities in China. I find that when qualified, mid-career judges can easily quit their jobs and find lucrative local employment as lawyers, local court leaders are more likely to attempt to retain these young, talented judges by strategically reforming promotion mechanisms for mid-ranking judicial cadres. Education: PhD in Government (expected Spring 2015); JD, University of Wisconsin Law School, 2005; BA, University of Michigan, 2002. Awards: Winner of the Law & Social Inquiry 2014 Graduate Student Paper Competition; Ward Fellowship, awarded by University of Texas-Austin College of Liberal Arts, Summer 2014; MacDonald Fellowship, awarded by University of Texas-Austin Government Department, Fall 2013; Boren Fellowship, 2011-2012, awarded by the National Security Education Program. Publications: Law & Social Inquiry (forthcoming in 2015), Journal of East Asian Studies (with William J. Hurst, 2011), book chapter in John Garrick (ed.), Law and Policy for China’s Market Socialism, Routledge (with William J. Hurst and Alexandra Sowash, 2012). Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, Chinese Politics, Comparative Judicial Politics, Law and Society, Comparative Political Economy, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law. Email: jjkinkel [at] utexas.edu Web Profile: https://sites.google.com/site/jjkinkel
Pete Mohanty. Comparative / Methodology / Political Theory. Thesis: Immigration Politics in a (Dis)Integrating Europe (Gregg, Givens, Jessee, Jacobsohn, Murer, Hooker). Thick values are those values that stem from the way of life of a particular community, while thin values reflect more basic claims to decency that do not depend on a particular tradition. This dissertation argues that analyzing the way in which individuals balance the competing claims of thick and thin values offers the key to understanding public opinion towards immigration in the European Union. I explain the conceptual link between thick values and right-leaning politics and between thin values and left-leaning politics, while differentiating this sense of left and right from alternative usages (particularly economic). I show empirically that in the majority of the EU, thick values cause opposition to immigration (and thin values openness to it). I demonstrate that thick values generally lead to support for the politics of the right, and thin values generally lead to support of the left, but that both the magnitude of the effect of these values and the type of relationship they have with economic ideology varies considerably country-to-country, which has important consequences in terms of party preferences. I provide evidence that thin values lead to increased support for the European Union and higher levels of support for fiscal union and foreign policy coordination. By contextualizing the findings in terms of ongoing European integration and the current economic crisis, the dissertation shows that attention to thick and thin values provides a robust framework for analyzing public opinion in the age of globalization. Previous Education: BA Swarthmore College (Honors Political Science Major, History Minor). MS Statistics University of Texas at Austin. Status: PhD expected Spring 2014. Awards: Center for European Studies Foreign Language Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship (2011-2012), University Continuing Fellowship (2012-2013). Publications: Comparative Sociology, Politics & Gender, Oxford University Press (chapter). Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, European Politics, Immigration Politics, Quantitative Methods (Least Squares, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Monte Carlo estimation of regression and / or measurement models), Normative Political Theory (particularly modern and contemporary). Email: email@example.com.
Christian Sorace. Comparative Politics / Chinese Politics / Political Theory. Thesis: Beyond Repair: State-Society Relations in the Aftermath of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. My research poses the question: how could the Chinese state accomplish the “miracle” of reconstructing Sichuan after the devastating 2008 earthquake in under three years, while failing to win the approval and support from the majority of local disaster residents, in fact, often producing the opposite effect of eroding people’s trust in the state? To explain this apparent paradox, each case chapter examines how various disaster areas within Sichuan were used as experimental laboratories for different models of political economic development. These models were adopted on the basis of factors such as, geographical location, natural resources, degree of post-earthquake damage, pre-earthquake socio-economic levels, intensity of national-level and international attention, as well as local political and social hierarchies. Despite the “good intentions” of the central government, in each of my cases, detailed ethnography presents a different picture of a disaffected and economically precarious local population. My dissertation explains this gap between the state and society based on a collection of ethnographic counter-narratives, interpretive analysis of official state discourse, historical understanding of Chinese Communist Party dynamics, and theorization of how legitimacy is negotiated in a Leninist political order under conditions of “late capitalism.” Education: BA Trinity College (Hartford, CT) Honors Major in Philosophy, Film Studies Minor; MA in the Social Sciences University of Chicago, emphasis on Political Science, PhD University of Texas at Austin expected 2014. Awards: University of Texas Graduate School Continuing Fellowship (2013-2014), Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellow (2012-2013), Ministry of Education Republic of Taiwan Mandarin Enrichment Scholarship (2010-2011), University of Texas Ward Fellowship (2010/2011), Joe R. Long Fellowship (2009). Publications: The China Quarterly, Critical Inquiry, New Political Science, Telos Journal, Article manuscript under review at New Left Review. Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, Chinese Politics, US-China Relations; Marxism and Post-Marxism. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Website: http://www.christiansorace.com/.
Allison White. Comparative Politics / International Relations. Thesis: Explaining Opposition Party Support in Russia: The Role of Electoral Geography and Parties of Power (Moser, Lin, Elkins, Madrid, Trubowitz). My dissertation explores the determinants of dominant party strength and opposition party weakness by focusing on the conditions that either foster electoral support for opposition parties or drive opposition party failure in the proportional-representation tier of Russian parliamentary elections across varying levels of political competitiveness and party systems types. While existing research on party system dynamics in dominant party regimes examines how greater electoral competition, manifest through opposition party success, can pose genuine challenges to the dominant party, my dissertation focuses on the opposite and notably unstudied trajectory: a relatively competitive system evolving toward a hegemonic party regime. In a series of multilevel models, I leverage an original and unique dataset that combines county and region-level data to shed light on how social and economic conditions influence voting patterns for various opposition parties. My dataset includes county-level election results from five parliamentary elections—1995, 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011—and sociodemographic data as well as data on regional contextual characteristics such as gross regional product and resource dependence. My multi-method research also draws on in-depth interviews with Russian political party leaders, activists and observers that I conducted during fieldwork during the 2011 Russian parliamentary elections, uncovering nuanced party-system dynamics and subtle political context. Education: Ph.D. Candidate (The University of Texas at Austin, expected Spring 2014); MA, Social Sciences, emphasis on Political Science, (The University of Chicago, 2007); BA, Politics with Honors (Occidental College, 2005). Awards: American Association of University Women, American Fellowship (2013-2014), Graduate Dean's Prestigious Fellowship (2013-2014), Malcolm MacDonald Dissertation Fellowship (2011), U.S. Department of State Title VIII Program for Research and Training in Eastern Europe and Eurasia Fellowship (2011), U.S. Department of Education Foreign Language Area Studies (FLAS) Fellowship (2009-2010 and Summer 2009). Publications: Co-authored article manuscript under review at Comparative Political Studies. Teaching Interests: Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Parties and Elections, Comparative Democratization, Varieties of Authoritarianism, the Politics of Russia and Former Communist Countries, Introduction to International Relations, American Foreign Policy, International Conflict, and Introduction to American Government. Email: email@example.com, Web profile: http://links.utexas.edu/bliydgm.