Profile
Stephen M Wechsler
Professor — Ph.D., Stanford University
Contact
- E-mail: wechsler@austin.utexas.edu
- Phone: 471-9026
- Office: CLA 4.702
- Office Hours: Tuesday 10:00 - 11:30; Friday 1:30 - 3:00
- Campus Mail Code: B5100
Biography
Stephen Wechsler is an Associate Professor of Linguistics. He holds a PhD in Linguistics from Stanford University. A specialist in syntactic theory, his research focuses on two interface areas: the interface between syntax and word meaning (‘argument structure’); and the interface between syntax and morphology (‘morphosyntax’). The first area is the subject of his 1995 book The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. His second book (The Many Faces of Agreement; with Larisa Zlatić, 2005) addresses morphosyntax, focusing on grammatical agreement in person, number, and gender. His recent work in that area investigates personal pronouns such as ‘you’ and ‘I’ from a multi-disciplinary perspective that includes developmental psychology, philosophy, and linguistics. He is also currently at work on a book-length overview of scholarship on word meaning and its relation to syntax (to be published by Oxford University Press).
LIN 372L • Syntax/Sem: Struc/Mean Utternc
41360 •
Fall 2013
Meets
TTH 1230pm-200pm JES A215A
show description
In this course we study the syntax and semantics of human language. Syntaxis concerned with how words are combined to form sentences. Semantics isconcerned with what those sentences mean, and how the meaning of a sentenceis constructed from the meanings of the component words. We will survey andanalyze syntactic and semantic phenomena from a wide variety of the world slanguages. This will reveal interesting patterns lurking within humanlanguages, despite their sometimes chaotic surface appearance. We will alsodiscover surprising similarities across seemingly diverse languages.
Text Paul R. Kroeger 2005. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction (CambridgeTextbooks in Linguistics) ISBN 0521016533
LIN 393S • Category Of Person
41433 •
Fall 2013
Meets
TTH 330pm-530pm CLA 4.434
show description
First and second person pronouns are probably found in all languages of the world. In this course we will address: person-number paradigms; logophoric pronouns; shifted indexical languages; conjunct-disjunct alignment systems; honorific pronouns; empathy-tracking with second person generics; the syntactic distribution of person agreement; and the acquisition of personal pronouns by children. We will seek to identify the deep connections between observations in these diverse realms.
Prerequisites: Syntax I; Semantics I (or permission of instructor)
Requirements: Class discussion; presentations of readings; short writing assignments; and a term paper.
LIN 391 • Studies In English Grammar
41035 •
Spring 2013
Meets
TTH 1230pm-200pm BEN 1.106
show description
We will survey the syntax of English, and some issues in the semanticinterpretation of English, with the two goals of (i) understanding thestructure of English syntax and (ii) acquiring the basic tools of syntacticanalysis, which can be applied to any language.
Required text: C. L. Baker, English Syntax.
LIN 372L • Syntax/Sem: Struc/Mean Utternc
40795 •
Fall 2012
Meets
MWF 1100am-1200pm PAR 206
show description
In this course we study the syntax and semantics of human language. Syntaxis concerned with how words are combined to form sentences. Semantics isconcerned with what those sentences mean, and how the meaning of a sentenceis constructed from the meanings of the component words. We will survey andanalyze syntactic and semantic phenomena from a wide variety of the world slanguages. This will reveal interesting patterns lurking within humanlanguages, despite their sometimes chaotic surface appearance. We will alsodiscover surprising similarities across seemingly diverse languages.
Text Paul R. Kroeger 2005. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction (CambridgeTextbooks in Linguistics) ISBN 0521016533
LIN 393S • Word Meaning And Syntax
40890 •
Fall 2012
Meets
W 100pm-400pm PAR 305
show description
The interface between word meaning and syntax poses someof the most important problems in contemporary grammatical theory.This course will approach the interface from both sides. We beginwith the ancient puzzle of what a word means, learning about polysemy,vagueness, coercion, semantic roles, and various approaches toconcepts and word meaning. Then we look at the mapping from thelexicon to the syntax, focusing on lexicalist and constructionisttheories.
Prerequisites: Syntax I and II; Semantics I is recommended (can betaken concurrently)
Texts: Readings from the literature.
LIN 381L • Syntax II
40860 •
Spring 2012
Meets
TTH 1100am-1230pm PAR 210
show description
This course will provide you with an understanding of the major syntactic phenomena, and the formal tools to analyze those phenomena and express theoretical claims. We will learn the framework of Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG), a lexicalist theory of syntax with no transformations. The framework is based on the factoring of grammatical description into categorial structure (phrase structure and morphology) and functional structure (subject, object, etc.), based on the observation that the languages of the world can vary widely in the former but are similar in the latter.
LIN 391 • Studies In English Grammar
40890 •
Spring 2012
Meets
TTH 200pm-330pm PAR 210
show description
We will survey the syntax of English, and some issues in the semantic interpretation of English, with the two goals of (i) understanding the structure of English syntax and (ii) acquiring the basic tools of syntactic analysis, which can be applied to any language.
LIN 372L • Syntax/Sem: Struc/Mean Utternc
40735 •
Fall 2011
Meets
TTH 1230pm-200pm GAR 1.126
show description
In this course we study the syntax and semantics of human language. Syntax is concerned with how words are combined to form sentences. Semantics is concerned with what those sentences mean, and how the meaning of a sentence is constructed from the meanings of the component words. We will survey and analyze syntactic and semantic phenomena from a wide variety of the world s languages. This will reveal interesting patterns lurking within human languages, despite their sometimes chaotic surface appearance. We will also discover surprising similarities across seemingly diverse languages.
Text Paul R. Kroeger 2005. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) ISBN 0521016533
LIN 393S • Indexicality & Self-Reference
40820 •
Fall 2011
Meets
TTH 930am-1100am PAR 210
show description
LIN 393S: Indexicality and Self-ReferenceIndexical (or deictic) forms are used to refer directly to people andthings in the speech context, instead of referring by means ofdescriptions. The first and second person pronouns, such as 'I','we', 'you', and their equivalents in other languages, are examples ofindexical forms; and other indexical forms typically involve takingthe perspective of the speaker or hearer. This course takes amulti-disciplinary approach to personal pronouns and other indexicalforms, seeking an account of them that does justice to the empiricalobservations arising from several disparate fields.
The followingtopics will be addressed:
• Universal patterns and typological variation in the person/numberparadigms of the world’s languages (Cysouw 2003, Bobaljik 2008,Wechsler 2010); interactions of person with various number systems(Harley and Ritter 2002; Siewierska 2004).
• The semantics of indexicality; multiple indexing approaches (Kamp1971, Kaplan 1977).
• Languages with different systems of spatial deixis (Hanks; Levinson).
• Deferred reference, e.g. where ‘I’ refers not to the speaker, but tomembers of a group instantiated by the speaker (Nunberg 1993).
• Languages with non-shifted indexicals where ‘I’ or ‘you’ can referto the speaker or hearer of a reported speech act rather than of theactual discourse (Schlenker; Anand).
• Conjunct/disjunct alignment systems: verbal inflections aligningwith a first/non-first person distinction in statements, and asecond/non-second distinction in questions.
• Point-of-view phenomena (Mitchell).
• The philosophical literature on the problem of the ‘essentialindexical’ (Perry 1979) and self-reference (Wittgenstein, Shoemaker,Evans, Lewis, Richard).
• Pronoun use by normally developing children (Chiat; Charney;Oshima-Takane) and by children with autism (Tager-Flusberg). Along-noted symptom of childhood autism is the striking tendency toreverse first and second person pronouns (Kanner 1943, inter alia).
• Personal pronouns in ASL and other signed languages (Meier).
• The role of theory of mind (Tomasello).
Prerequisites: Syntax I; Semantics I.
Requirements: Class discussion; short writing assignments; and a term paper.
Texbook: Readings from the literature
LIN 381L • Syntax II
41190 •
Spring 2011
Meets
MWF 100pm-200pm PAR 310
show description
This is an advanced course on the description and analysis of syntax.
The course includes an introduction to Lexical-Functional Grammar
(LFG), a lexicalist theory of syntax with no transformations. The
framework is based on the factoring of grammatical description into
categorial structure (phrase structure and morphology) and functional
structure, based on the observation that grammars vary widely in the
former but are similar in the latter. This makes LFG a good framework
for field description, as well as for studying typology and
universals. We will survey some major issues in syntax across a wide
variety of language types.
Texts
--Joan Bresnan 2000. Lexical Functional Syntax. Blackwell Press.
--Mary Dalrymple 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar (Syntax & Semantics
34). Academic Press.
LIN 391 • Studies In English Grammar
41225 •
Spring 2011
Meets
MWF 1100am-1200pm JES A217A
show description
We will survey the syntax of English, and some issues in the semantic
interpretation of English, with the two goals of (i) understanding the
structure of English syntax and (ii) acquiring the basic tools of syntactic
analysis, which can be applied to any language.
Texts
C. L. Baker, English Syntax.
LIN 372L • Syntax/Sem: Struc/Mean Utternc
40750 •
Fall 2010
Meets
TTH 1100am-1230pm MEZ 2.124
show description
Course Description
In this course we study the syntax and semantics of human language. Syntax
is concerned with how words are combined to form sentences. Semantics is
concerned with what those sentences mean, and how the meaning of a sentence
is constructed from the meanings of the component words. We will survey and
analyze syntactic and semantic phenomena from a wide variety of the world s
languages. This will reveal interesting patterns lurking within human
languages, despite their sometimes chaotic surface appearance. We will also
discover surprising similarities across seemingly diverse languages.
Text
Paul R. Kroeger 2005. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction (Cambridge
Textbooks in Linguistics)
ISBN 0521016533
LIN 372L • Syntax/Sem: Struc/Mean Utternc
41185 •
Spring 2010
Meets
MWF 100pm-200pm PAR 105
show description
For detailed Course Schedule, download attachment.
LIN 381L • Syntax II
41220 •
Spring 2010
Meets
MWF 1100-1200 JES A207A
show description
For detailed Course Schedule, download attachment.
LIN 393S • Topics In Syntax And Semantics
41625 •
Fall 2009
Meets
TTH 200pm-330pm CAL 200
show description
Description. The interface between syntax and word meaning is one of the most important issues in contemporary grammatical theory. This course will approach the interface from both sides, beginning with the ancient puzzle of what a word means. We will learn about polysemy, vagueness, coercion, semantic (thematic) roles, psychological approaches to concepts and word meaning, prototypes, lexical decomposition, conceptual structure, constructionism, lexicalism, diathesis alternations, and theories of the mapping from the lexicon to the syntax.
Prerequisites: Syntax I and II; Semantics I is recommended (can be taken concurrently)
Requirements. Basis for grading indicated by percentages (plus/minus grades will be assigned for the final grade).
1. Class discussion (10%). Questions, comments, discussion. Very important part of a seminar!
2. Occasional homework exercises (25%).
3. Presentation of one optional or obligatory reading (10%). Plan for 20 to 30 minutes; prepare a handout.
4. Informally propose a term paper topic, by email or in person. Due Oct. 8.
5. Term Paper, written proposal (5%) One to three pages (double spaced), with at least 3 references. Due Oct. 15.
6. Term Paper, draft (10%). Due Nov. 19.
7. Term Paper (30%). Around 10-15 pages; at least 10 references. Due Dec. 11.
8. Presentation of your term paper (10%). These will be scheduled during the last few weeks of the semester.
Textbooks
• Levin, Beth, and M. Rappaport-Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Not ordered at Coop Bookstore; please order a copy, e.g. from Amazon.com)
• All other readings available through Blackboard (http://courses.utexas.edu)
Students with disabilities may request appropriate academic accommodations from the Division of Diversity and Community Engagement, Services for Students with Disabilities, 471-6259.
Outline
I. Word meaning I: polysemy, homophony, generality, and vagueness
For Tues., Sept. 1, read:
• SLI Ch. 1 ‘The place of word meaning in generative syntax’
• SLI Ch. 2 ‘Polysemy’
• Apresjan, J. D. 1974. Regular Polysemy. Linguistics 142: 5-32.
(Optional: Cruse, D. A. (1995), 'Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistic viewpoint', in P. Saint-Dizier and E. Viegas (eds.), Computational Lexical Semantics (Cambridge University Press), 33–49.)
II. Psychological approaches: Concepts, prototypes, exemplars
Ravin, Yael and Claudia Leacock 2000, ‘Polysemy: an overview.’ In Ravin, Y. and Leacock, C. (2000), Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches (Oxford University Press).
Murphy, Gregory L. 2002. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press:
• Ch. 2 ‘Typicality and the Classical View of Categories’, in (Murphy 2002)
• Ch. 3 ‘Theories’, in (Murphy 2002)
• Ch. 11 ‘Word Meaning’, in (Murphy 2002)
III. Argument realization
Levin, B., and M. Rappaport-Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ch. 8 ‘Word meaning’, from Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and grammar: an introduction to semantics: MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA.
Other readings to be announced.
IV. Causative alternations
Haspelmath, Martin (1993), 'More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations', Causatives and transitivity (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 87-120.
Wechsler, Stephen 2007. A diachronic account of English deverbal nominals. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, UC Berkeley, April 27, 2007.
Coppock, Elizabeth 2008. ‘The Causative Alternation’. Unpublished manuscript.
Wechsler, Stephen 2008. ‘Causative Alternations.’ Unpublished manuscript.
Other readings to be announced.
Publications
Stephen Wechsler 2008. ‘Punctual Paths in Three Languages.’ Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XII.
Hyun-Jong Hahm and Stephen Wechsler (2007). ‘Untangling the Russian Predicate Agreement Knot.’ Proceedings of the 2007 annual meeting on Lexical-Functional Grammar. CSLI On-line publications.
Stephen Wechsler 2007. A diachronic account of English deverbal nominals. Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, UC Berkeley, April 27, 2007.
Stephen Wechsler 2006. Having a topic, wanting a focus. Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Discourse Structure. University of Texas, Austin. March 3-5, 2006.
Stephen Wechsler 2006. ‘Why are the lazy so agreeable?’ In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Sigrid Beck, Regine Eckardt, Renate Musan & Barbara Stiebels (eds.) Between 40 and 60 Puzzles for Krifka. Centre for General Linguistics, Typology and Universals Research (ZAS), Berlin. http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/index.html
Stephen Wechsler 2005. ‘Thematic Structure.’ In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition. Elsevier. (by invitation)
Stephen Wechsler 2005. ‘What is right and wrong about little v.’ In Mila Vulchanova & Tor A. Åfarli (eds.) Grammar and Beyond— Essays in honour of Lars Hellan. Oslo: Novus Press. pp. 179-195
Stephen Wechsler 2005. ‘Resultatives Under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity’. The Syntax of Aspect—Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, ed. Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport, Oxford University Press.
Stephen Wechsler, 2005. ‘Weighing in on Scales: a Reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff’. Language 81.2, June 2005. (Discussion note.) [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 2004. ‘Number as Person.’ In Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 5 (on-line Proceedings of the Fifth Syntax And Semantics Conference In Paris), pp. 255-274.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 2003. The Many Faces of Agreement. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 239 pages.
Pascal Denis, Jonas Kuhn, and Stephen Wechsler 2003. ‘V-PP Goal Motion Complexes in English: an HPSG Account.’ In Proceedings of the ACL-SIGSEM workshop: The Linguistic Dimensions of Prepositions and their Use in Computational Linguistics Formalisms and Applications, Toulouse, France, 121-132.
Stephen Wechsler 2003. ‘Serial Verbs and Serial Motion’. In Dorothee Beermann and Lars Hellan (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-Verb Constructions, Trondheim Summer School 2003. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
Incheol Choi and Stephen Wechsler 2001. ‘Mixed Categories and Argument Transfer in the Korean Light Verb Construction. On-line proceedings of HPSG 2001.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 2001. ‘Case Realization and Identity’. Lingua 111, pp. 539-560. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler and Bokyung Noh 2001. ‘Predication and Anaphora: Parallels Between Korean and English Resultatives.’ Language Sciences 23, pp. 391-423. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 2001. ‘An Analysis of English Resultatives Under the Event-Argument Homomorphism Model of Telicity.’ Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure, University of Texas, Austin, Oct. 13-15, 2000.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 2000. ‘A Theory of Agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian.’ Language 76.4, pp. 799-832. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 1999. ‘Gender Resolution in Coordinate Structures.’ Proceedings of the Workshop on the Structure of Spoken and Written Texts, University of Texas at Austin.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 1999. ‘A Theory of Agreement and Disagreement.’ Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society annual meeting, Berkeley CA, Feb. 16, 1998. pp. 280-291.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 1999. ‘Agreement in Discourse.’ Proceedings of the Conference on the Structure of Non-narrative Texts. University of Texas, Austin.
Stephen Wechsler 1999. ‘HPSG, GB, and the Balinese Bind’. In Lexical And Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, edited by A. Kathol, J.-P. Koenig and G.Webelhuth. Stanford: CSLI. 179-195.
Kearsy Cormier, Richard P. Meier and Stephen Wechsler 1999. ‘Locus Agreement in American Sign Language.’ In Lexical And Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, edited by A. Kathol, J.-P. Koenig and G.Webelhuth. Stanford: CSLI. 215-229.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 1999. ‘Syntax and Morphological Realization in Serbo-Croatian’. In Slavic in HPSG, edited by R. Borsley and A. Przepiorkowski, CSLI Publications, 283-309.
Stephen Wechsler and Larisa Zlatic 1998. ‘Agreement in Discourse.’ Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Forum Conference on Non-narrative Discourse, Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin, Feb. 13-14, 1998.
Stephen Wechsler and I Wayan Arka 1998. Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: an Argument Structure Based Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16:387-441. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 1997. ‘Prepositional Phrases from the Twilight Zone.’ Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20 (2):127-154. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 1997. ‘Resultative Predicates and Control.’ In Texas Linguistic Forum 38: The Syntax and Semantics of Predication, edited by R. Blight and M. Moosally, 307-321. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Department of Linguistics.
Larisa Zlatic and Stephen Wechsler 1997. ‘Mixed Agreement in Serbian: A Constraint-Based Approach.’ Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Brian Agbayani and Sze-Wing Tang. Published for the Stanford Linguistics Association by CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 521-535.
I Wayan Arka and Stephen Wechsler 1996. ‘Argument Structure and Linear Order in Balinese Binding.’ On-line Proceedings of the Workshop on Lexical-Functional Grammar, held in Grenoble, France, August 28, 1996, http://www-csli.stanford.edu/ publications/LFG/toc-lfg1.html
Stephen Wechsler and Yae-Sheik Lee 1996. ‘The Domain of Direct Case Assignment.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14.3, 629-664. [RJ]
Stephen Wechsler 1995. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 157 pages.
Stephen Wechsler 1995. ‘Preposition Selection Outside the Lexicon’. Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Raul Aranovich, William Byrne, Susanne Preuss, and Martha Senturia (eds.). Published for the Stanford Linguistics Association by CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 416-431.
Stephen Wechsler 1991. ‘Verb Second and Illocutionary Force.’ In Views on Phrase Structure, ed. by Denis Bouchard and Katherine Leffel, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 177-191.
Stephen Wechsler 1990. ‘Verb Second and Illocutionary Force in Swedish.’ Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science, vol. 6: Parametric Variation in Germanic and Romance, eds. Elisabet Engdahl, Mike Reape, Martin Mellor, and Richard Cooper, pp. 229-244.
Stephen Wechsler 1990. ‘Accomplishments and the Prefix re-.’ Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society XIX , Juli Carter and Rose-Marie Dechaine (eds.), Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Dept. of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 419-434.
Masayo Iida, Draga Zec and Stephen Wechsler (eds.) 1987. Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure: Interactions of Morphology, Syntax, and Discourse. CSLI Publications, Stanford. 238 pages.
Stephen Wechsler 1987. ‘Against Verb Movement: Evidence from Swedish.’ Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 23.
Mary Dalrymple, Jeffrey Goldberg, Kristin Hanson, Michael Inman, Christopher Piñon, and Stephen Wechsler (eds.) 1986. WCCFL 5: The Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. CSLI Publications, Stanford.



