With great sadness we mourn the passing of Professor Carlota S. Smith. Professor Smith died Thursday, May 24, at the age of 73 after a long battle with cancer.
This page contains memories of Carlota from her colleagues, students and friends. We invite contributions: please send them directly to Alexis Palmer (alexispalmer@mail.utexas.edu).
A memorial service was held Saturday, June
2, 2007, at 4 p.m. in the Connally Ballroom at the University of Texas
Alumni Center.
About Carlota Smith:
CHRONOS 8: International Conference on Tense, Aspect, Mood, and Modality is being held in honor of Prof. Smith
Professor Carlota S. Smith of the Department of Linguistics at The University of Texas at Austin died Thursday, May 24 at the age of 73 after a long battle with cancer. She was the Dallas TACA Centennial Professor in the Humanities and taught at The University of Texas at Austin for 38 years.
Carlota Smith received her bachelor's degree from Radcliffe College in 1955. In the late 1950s, she became a research assistant and then a doctoral student in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Pennsylvania. During this time she worked with Zellig Harris, who directed the doctoral dissertation of Noam Chomsky and who would also later direct her own doctoral dissertation. In 1961, Prof. Smith was a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, MA, where she was one of the very first woman students to work with Chomsky. Prof. Smith's first publication (`A Class of Complex Modifiers in English', 1961) dates from this period. It appeared in the journal Language.
After receiving her M.A. (1964) and Ph.D. (1967) at the University of Pennsylvania, Prof. Smith joined the faculty of The University of Texas at Austin in 1969, where she was a faculty member in the Department of Linguistics until her death. She served as the chair of the department from 1981-1985. In 1991, she was named the Dallas TACA Centennial Professor in the Humanities.
Prof. Smith's early research examined the syntax of English. In 1969, she published, along with Elizabeth Shipley and Lila Gleitman, a very influential paper on how children acquire English as a first language; in ensuing years she would publish several more papers on child language development. Starting in the mid-1970s, she embarked on what was perhaps her most important line of research. In many papers and in a very important book (The Parameter of Aspect, published in 1991 by Kluwer), she analyzed the ways in which languages encode time and how they encode the way events happen over time. Prof. Smith's work on temporal aspect has been notable because of its empirical foundation in her careful analyses of a number of quite different languages, including English, French, Russian, Mandarin, and Navajo. Through her many years of research on Navajo, she became a member of the Navajo Language Academy, a group that seeks to further the study of Navajo, to keep Navajo from becoming endangered, and to provide training in linguistic research to members of the Navajo Nation.
In 2003, Cambridge University Press published Prof. Smith's second book, Modes of Discourse. This book analyzes the grammatical properties that distinguish different genres of discourse (e.g., narratives vs. reports vs. descriptions). In this book and in earlier papers (for example, a 1985 paper on the French author Gustave Flaubert), she sought to bring the analytic tools of linguistics to the humanistic study of literature.
Carlota Smith was an active member of the Department of Linguistics until the very last. This semester she taught a graduate seminar on time in language. She was meeting with students and faculty in her office just three days before her death. Throughout the semester she was thinking about how to ensure the future of the department in which she had taught for virtually her entire career. At The University of Texas at Austin, her absence will be felt for many years to come.
Prof. Smith is survived by her husband, John Robertson, who is a
professor in UT's Law School. She is also survived by her children
Alison and Joel, and by her grandchildren Sylvia and Ari.
A memorial service was held Saturday, June 2, 2007. It was a lovely,
elegant celebration of Carlota's life. Below are transcripts of the
speeches given at the service. An audio
recording of the service has been posted on the web.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlota Smith was born on May 21, 1934 in New York City to Charles
and Sylvia Shipman. She received her B.A. from Radcliffe College and
her Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of Pennsylvania. She
taught in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Texas at
Austin from 1969 until her death on May 24, 2007. She leaves her
husband, John Robertson, her daughter Alison Smith, her son Joel Smith,
and her grandchildren, Sylvia and Ari.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Judith Langlois gave a welcome and introduced each speaker in turn.
Judith gave single white roses to each speaker and to Carlota's two
grandchildren.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alison Smith spoke next.
Until recently, my mother was never sick a day in her life, with the
exception of a bout of hepatitis in the 1970's when we were in France.
She liked to say that she had the constitution of a rhinoceros. So when
she came to visit us in Boston in May of 2005, we were all puzzled by
her "large tummy" as she referred to it. She showed me how she could no
longer zip up her pants and we laughed about how strange this was.
Since she was so healthy and always took such good care of herself, my
mother had what she called "the 2 week rule"; she would never go to
doctors until 2 weeks had passed, since whatever it was usually healed
on its own. She confessed in this case, however, that the "large tummy"
had been going on for 2 months. She agreed when she got back to Austin
to finally go to the doctor. We thought it might be something like gall
stones.
In fact it was fourth stage ovarian cancer -- "the silent killer",
as a friend of mine referred to it. She and John and her dear friend
Judy Langlois went to Houston, to MD Anderson for a consultation where
she was told she probably had 2 to 3 years to live. And then she went
about living her life as she always had, bravely, with as much energy
as she could muster and with no moment for self pity or weakness. She
had an operation and then began receiving chemotherapy, which she
underwent for more than a year and a half. She lost all her hair and
got two wigs. She would often astound us by cramming more in a week
than most people do in a month. We worried that she was overdoing it --
and various friends had to tell me, when John and I would want to scale
back her numerous activities, that she was doing it "her way". During
those last 2 years, she managed to teach her classes, to get to Paris
twice, a city she loved, to New York, and she ever visited me last year
on my 49th birthday in Boston. Her beloved husband John was
extraordinary throughout her illness, caring, tender, and there 100%.
She called him "MFC" -- "my favorite chelah" -- which refers to the
main character in Kipling's book "Kim", who takes care of and protects
the infirm holy man.
On Mother's Day, my brother and I visited our mother in Austin for a
very special weekend. We wanted to take her to the Four Seasons for
brunch; she preferred to go for a hike at Pedernales Falls. She turned
73 on May 21st, and this week we were all planning to meet in New York
with old friends from our early childhood years and to go to dim sum,
which she loved.
"I had always liked
Chinese because of Chinese restaurants when I was a little girl in New
York. My father was very interested in things Chinese and we went down
to Chinatown about once a month and had dim sum... Everyone in the
restaurant knew us. The men used to make little animals for me out of
the dough that you make dim sum with...
So I had a long and
very pleasant association with it."
For part of my life, my mother was a single mother. She and my
brother and I were very close. We had difficult periods but they
passed. My mother always had a group of close women friends who were
often like aunts to me, since she was an only child. There would always
be lots of laughter and camaraderie. This ability to connect with
all kinds of people and bring them into our lives was a real gift my
mother had which she passed on to us. She also passed on her gusto for
life... when she was dying I said to her, "Mum, is there anything you
want"....
and she responded, "I want everything."
I have spent much of this past week with photographs of my mother,
preparing with my brother for the slide show that you will see. Someone
wrote on a card to us that my mother was beautiful "inside and out" and
she was. We loved her very much and you will see a record of her life
in images, right after Joel, my brother, finishes his remarks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joel Smith spoke next, and then Alison and Joel presented A Life in
Pictures, a slideshow of images from Carlota's life, from early
childhood through May 2007.
My Mum
I know all our hearts are full of sadness. These recent days have
been very hard as we grapple with our mother's death and her very real
absence. She was just here, and is still very much with us.
Her absence is felt all the greater, for while she was fighting her
sickness these past years, she also continued to live her life just as
fully as she could - teaching her classes, traveling - for work and
vacations, all the while sharing her life and energy with her
colleagues and friends, her family, and with John.
For me, this energetic embrace of life is what made our mother such
a wonderful and special person.
One could not help but get caught up in it, this energy, which was
sprinkled with her own beautiful mix of grace, caring, generosity,
interest, integrity, openness, and love.
Her beautiful spirit, and our love for her make this day of
reflection a time when we can also celebrate her life, and our times
with her.
In talking about my mother, I would be remiss if I neglected to
touch on her wonderful cooking. I know that many of you here have had
the good fortune of eating my mothers' delicious cooking and sharing
meals with my mother and John, and of course spending time with her,
helping while she chopped and cooked -- which was truly a delight, and
yes, Alison and I got to eat these meals all the time.
However, one of my very earliest recollections of her cuisine was of
a particularly nasty bout of hives, induced, we think, by eating way
too many of my mother's delicious onion rings. This eating too much of
my mother's great food was of course to continue, Aunt Anna's recipe
for chopped liver was my next indulgence, and fortunately there were no
hives that time.
Now just so you don't think our tastes were too refined when we grew
up here in Austin in the late 60's, we were indulged and did have Kraft
Space Sticks in the house along with powdered Tang.
Our mother enjoyed the love and caring of a meal shared together. In
the early 70's when Alison, my mother, and I all lived in Paris
together, my mother always wanted to make sure that we could have
dinner out one night a week -- to make sure we had a special meal
together -- and we would go together to a little Vietnamese restaurant
down the street (that is, if Alison wasn't protesting in the streets of
Paris that night).
This quality in my mother -- of making an effort -- is something
that I know you are all familiar with. She was a caring and generous
hostess, and loved to cook, experimenting with meals all the time,
especially delighting in her new beautiful kitchen.
She was someone who of course loved special cheeses, patés,
and champagne, but she was also my Mum who loved driving all over
central Texas with me and my wife, Rosemary, to try different BBQ ribs,
sausage, and brisket, sharing carnivorous delights. It was something we
enjoyed together -- something we shared.
She was someone who loved to share your moments with you, your
interests, your loves and your dreams. When we talked on the phone, I
would tell her where I had walked, what new little restaurant I had
tried out in New York. What my wife Rosemary was up to, and how her
little grandson Ari was doing. She was interested in all of us.
She was always interested in new and different things -- just 3
weeks ago we watched part of a new Spanish film together, but she was
too tired and went to bed, but the next day she watched it and emailed
us to say how special she found it, and that she had enjoyed it so. I
want to read you this email she sent to us after our Mother's Day visit:
Dear Alison and Joel --
It was a wonderful visit - I
still feel a glow of warmth and fun. You are not only my
favorite, wonderful children, but also you are
both very good company!!!
THANK YOU THANK YOU for coming, and for the delightful birthday gifts.
I watched the rest of "Volver"
last night, while John was looking at one of his games -- really a
special movie I think. Almodovar
manages to convey a feeling for
the life of women, an appreciation of the small things of life, that's
unusual. I want to know more
about the sister, and the woman
with cancer - what happened to them exactly to circumscribe their
lives? etc. Do you have the
names of any other movies I
should watch?
I feel a little better today,
am hoping finally to get something done on my list of to-dos, then will
have acupuncture in the afternoon.
love & hugs
your
Mum
One of my mother's greatest gifts was this desire to share with you
what was special to you, and derive joy with you in that shared moment
together.
My mother lived her life in a way that was wonderfully rich, full,
and varied. She loved her family and would dash in for a quick visit to
Corning or Boston, and as you all know, she loved her work very much.
She enjoyed reading dense novels, but she also loved a mystery in bed
(hopefully not keeping up John). She loved the outdoors, and really
loved going on long walks -- enjoying the exercise and the beauty
around us. Just three weeks ago we all went for a beautiful walk to
Pedernales State Park on Mother's Day. For us all, that was a special
day together.
There have been so many people who have been there for our mother
over these recent difficult years, and we thank all of you deeply.
Throughout my mother's illness, you have been there for both my mother
and John, and I know your warmth and generosity reflects your love for
our mother.
And John, I want to say thank you for the joy and richness you
brought to our mother's life. Your love for her has been a great thing.
We're so happy you found each other, and we know how happy Grandy would
have been as well.
In closing, I want to say how proud I am of you, my mother. Your
life was sometimes very hard, but your spirit prevailed, and your
parents would have been so very proud of you too. I know we are all
feeling blessed that you touched our lives with your love and energetic
spirit. Thank you Mum.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Recollections and Remarks.
Mary Ross Taylor is a long-time friend of Carlota's. She spoke next.
It would be impossible to speak for Carlota's friends -- we are so
many and so various. I speak as one of many friends gathered here today.
Carlota and I met soon after I came to graduate school at UT in
1969. Though I did not take her Syntax courses, the department was
small and we were neighbors in Westlake Hills. We became friends, and
then better friends even though I left Austin, and left Linguistics.
Her friendships extended in many directions, so one of the perks of
knowing Carlota was that she introduced you to a lot of interesting
people.
Some years ago I was on the ferry to Martha's Vineyard to visit
Carlota, who decided to send her future son-in-law Alan to fetch me. We
had never met. When I saw all the people on the dock waiting to get on
the ferry, I thought "We will never find each other!" But rather
quickly he appeared from the shoving crush of people and said "You must
be Mary Ross." "Alan!" I said, "How did you find me?" I was wearing a
black t-shirt with Our Lady of Guadalupe on the front in neon pink and
green, and a large Day-Glo yellow backpack, and my hair would have been
up in spikes. "Well," he said suavely, "When I saw you I said to
myself, that looks like someone that would be a friend of Carlota's."
She had a great gift for sizing up situations and responding with
speed and shrewdness. I loved to ask her advice and it was a great gift
to me. She was a woman of action as well as thought. During one of her
teaching sojourns in Paris, I was passing through with a former student
of hers, and we planned a dinner outing. It was somewhere obscure, so
we took the car and a map, but the map was not the territory. Streets
turned one way against us. Official sawhorses barricaded the
alternatives. We ended up completely stymied. I do not recall whether
Carlota said "I have an idea," but we jumped out or the car and removed
the barricade. So we made it in time for that dinner reservation.
Carlota was clear about her loyalties and she did not compromise
them. She was loyal to her family, her friends, and to the Linguistics
Department. After one stay in Paris she found that the students who
rented her house had left it in an unsatisfactory state. She was
especially unhappy that they had neglected the yard, which she declared
was full of weeds. When she pointed out the worst to her daughter,
Alison said, "Mummy -- those aren't weeds. That is marijuana." It was
the biggest, tallest, greenest bed of marijuana you ever saw. This news
was greeted with glee in some quarters, but Carlota was resolute. It
could not stay. It could not be helpfully carried off by anyone she
knew. "Absolutely not," she said. "It would not do for a professor in
Linguistics to have marijuana growing in the yard." And before any
discredit could come to her department, the weed disappeared.
Carlota was interested in the unfamiliar, and she made the most of
it. This made her a wonderful traveling companion. She joined a high
spirited Houston group in New York for some opening or event that I've
forgotten. What I remember is that afterward, we set off for the disco
of the moment, in the height of the disco days. Carlota muttered to me
when we arrived that she probably looked like the chaperon. When a
stranger asked me to dance, she waved her hard, "Go, go." Shortly, I
looked back for her, and she had disappeared. When I saw her next, she
was on the dance floor with another stranger, her purse neatly over her
arm, just like the Queen.
Elegant, resourceful, principled, and interested in new
possibilities. Carlota talked of new plans and new adventures from the
day I met her till the day she died. Her love of life is a legacy to
all her friends.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Recollections and
Remarks.
Following Mary Ross, we heard from Richard Meier, chair of the
Department of Linguistics at UT Austin.
Carlota led an exemplary life, a
life well-lived until her final hours. A
life that will be well-remembered by her family, her friends, her
colleagues,
her students, and by generations of intellectual offspring who through
her work
will come to know her mind and her intellect.
That same semester Peter MacNeilage
(along with Björn Lindblom) were also at the Center.
At the time I was applying to be an assistant
professor here at UT, and my wife Madeline was applying to Spanish
&
Portuguese. After my campus visit here
in Austin, I then had a second interview with Carlota and Peter on the
terrace
at the Center. I don’t remember much of
the conversation other than that it was very pleasant; I do remember
the view
looking out to the south end of San Francisco Bay.
Since that interview—and since
being offered the job here—Carlota has been one of my very closest
colleagues
and friends here at UT. Most every day
brought a substantive conversation about the state of the discipline,
or the
state of the department, or the state of Austin restaurants. This last
week was
more difficult than any week I could imagine as department chair.
In July 2005, soon after her cancer
was diagnosed and soon after her surgery, Keith Walters and I
interviewed
Carlota about her career in linguistics.
As most of you can imagine, it was a fascinating and wonderful
interview. A lot of what I’ll have to
say here draws upon that interview….
Carlota’s start in linguistics did
not come in Cambridge, MA when she was an undergrad at Radcliffe. Instead her start came in that hotbed of
linguistics that we know of as suburban Philadelphia.
In the late 1950s, both she and Lila Gleitman
were faculty wives at Swarthmore College. Neither Lila nor Carlota was
content
to ghost-write their husbands’ books.
It seems that Lila—who was still a
very junior grad student at Penn—decided that Carlota would be an
appropriate
RA for Zellig Harris. Harris had
directed Noam Chomsky’s dissertation and would later direct Carlota’s
dissertation. Here’s what Carlota had to
say about this in the interview:
[Lila] marched me down to Penn, introduced me to Zellig Harris, and I was hired for the summer to be a research assistant. And my job, which I was perfectly capable of doing was to categorize English verbs for Harris’s research project, which was in principle on mechanical translation. This is whatever we are – we’re in ’59 or ’60 now.[….] So I knew nothing about linguistics, and I loved it!
In 1969 she was searching for
teaching jobs. She apparently sent her first inquiry about a job here
at UT to
David Hakes, who was then a faculty member in Psychology who worked on
language
acquisition. The connection to David
Hakes was a natural one given Carlota’s own work on language
development in
children. Along with Liz Shipley and
Lila Gleitman, she published in 1969 an important and very early
experimental
study of children’s comprehension of language.
The contact with David Hakes was
fruitful. In quick order she was offered a position as a “faculty
associate” on
an NSF faculty development grant that also brought Harvey Sussman to UT
that
same year. Harvey sent this to me this
morning:
Carlota was soon offered a
tenure-track position here.
She spent the year that she was up for tenure
in France. Some of the assistant
professors
here might enjoy the tenure year better if they too were in France. Perhaps Bill Powers or Randy Diehl would like
to consider this as a possible reform to the tenure process.
While in
France, Carlota became interested in the way languages encode time. The reason was, as every student of first
semester French knows, English and French—despite their close
ties—differ
substantially in their systems of tense and aspect (although
first-semester
students of French likely don’t know those terms).
Tense refers to whether an event
occurred in the past, present, or future.
Aspect refers to how events happen over time.
Is the event viewed as a whole or only in
part? Was the event instantaneous or did
it unfold over time? What could be more
important conceptually? How is that we
talk about the times of our lives?
Her first publication on tense and
aspect appeared in 1975 and she continued to explore the topic until
the end of
her life. In 1991 she published The Parameter of Aspect, the most
influential publication of her career.
In 2003 Cambridge published her second book which is entitled Modes of Discourse.
My colleagues Steve Wechsler and
David Beaver recently observed that Carlota “spearheaded a fundamental
transition of formal semantics into an empirically rich linguistic
discipline.
[Carlota’s work] was the first sustained attempt to apply formal
semantics
comparatively across multiple
unrelated languages, and non-Indo-European languages in particular….” She worked on a remarkable span of language:
Mandarin, Navajo, English, French, and (in collaboration with Gil
Rappaport)
Russian.
My colleague Nora England noted
that Carlota’s work was tremendously important for linguists who are
seeking to
document the world’s under-described languages, many of which are quite
endangered.
brave
vibrant
lively
joyous
grace
dignity
These were the way Carlota was until the very last.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Recollections and Remarks.
The next speaker was Alexis Palmer, a graduate student in linguistics
who worked very closely with Carlota.
I feel very honored to be standing here today as a representative of
the many students whose lives were in one way or another touched by
Carlota Smith. She touched us as a teacher, an adviser, a careful and
critical reader, a mentor, a supporter, a friend, and a loved one.
Carlota treated us not so much as inexperienced students but rather
as fledgling colleagues, with plenty still to learn but also plenty to
contribute. I-Wen Lai wrote from Taiwan about an email exchange she and
Carlota had over spring break this year. I-Wen and Carlota had been
discussing tense in Iquito, an Amazonian language I-Wen works on, and
Carlota emailed to say that she had been thinking about a term for one
of the tenses in Iquito. Carlota wrote, "... I suggest this term ...
but I am not too happy about it, perhaps you can think of a better
one." With simple words like these, Carlota had a way of dissolving
anxiety and encouraging us to pursue our work with rigor, enthusiasm,
and confidence. I always trusted Carlota to tell me just what she
thought of the work I was doing -- whether good or bad -- and rather
than delivering criticism in a disheartening way, she treated us with
sufficient respect to expect that we would benefit from the criticism
and produce better work as a result.
Perhaps one of the reasons Carlota so loved working with her
students is that we helped to feed her life-long passion for learning.
As Ben Hansen described it, hers was a "delightfully agile and
expansive intellect." Over the past week I have heard from students
doing work in many different subfields of linguistics of the interest
Carlota showed in their work and the generosity and thoughtfulness with
which she provided her input.
We benefited too from the breadth and depth of her experience as an
academic -- she had a talent for putting things in perspective. I'd
like to tell now some of what I heard from Nick Gaylord about their
many debates on questions of syntactic theory. Carlota, familiar as she
was with such a long history of linguistic scholarship, had a very keen
sense for how long-standing some of the supposedly "current" problems
in linguistic theory really are. Nick says: I remember more than one of
our discussions that ended with her pursing her lips and saying, "well,
I just don't really see what the big deal is. Isn't that just the same
thing that so-and-so said 40 years ago?" He goes on: And she'd proceed
to hand me some old article I'd never even heard of, and sure enough,
she was usually quite right.
This talent for putting things in perspective also came up outside
the purely academic realm, and here I share some words from Jessica
White, who by the way is due tomorrow and is here today. Carlota was at
the vanguard of women in academia who also chose to be mothers, paving
the way for all of the women in our department who have had, or will
have, babies while pursuing graduate degrees. Consider the rigors of
being in grad school, a single mother of two, and the fact that this
was the early 1960s, before the second wave women's movement had
achieved so much that we now take for granted. Jess is just one of
several women in the department who Carlota encouraged in their life
choices by sharing her own experiences. It's because of Carlota and
women like her that it's even a possibility for women of our generation
to choose to pursue an academic career while being a mother.
Personally, I flourished working with Carlota because I felt from
her a continuous sense of acceptance, encouragement, and a faith in my
abilities, my ideas, and my identity as an independent scholar. Several
years ago, I was at a point of low confidence and great uncertainty,
and somehow, gently, she got me talking about what my strengths were as
a linguist and a scholar. As time went on, and I began to see more
clearly where I was going, I always felt that she was there in my
corner, cheering me on. I felt that she was always happy to see me,
always glad to take a moment or two to chat. One day recently I
marveled at how things had turned around and again, simply,
matter-of-factly, she said, "well, you just finally found the right
thing to be working on."
Finally, and most importantly, I want to talk about Carlota as a
role model, as an inspiration. As graduate students, we're going
through this very demanding yet very exciting time of laying the
foundations for an academic career. We're just starting out, and in
Carlota we had an example of someone who was well along the path and
still loving every minute of it. When we first learned of her illness,
it wasn't clear how things might go. I imagined how I might react in
the same situation, and I thought I might want to stay home and in bed,
or move to the Caribbean, or anyway that linguistics is the last thing
I would want to be doing. I realized soon enough that Carlota continued
to work not out of any sense of obligation -- that working was what she
should be doing -- but rather
because it was exactly what she loved to be doing, exactly where she
wanted to be. We were tremendously fortunate to have had Carlota in our
lives, and we will miss her profoundly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlota's husband John Robertson was the last speaker.
I am riven with grief, but gushing with gratitude. To all the family
and friends who gave so much love and support to Carlota and to me
during her illness and now.
The friends I will mention, without any attempt to describe their
heartfelt contributions: Jane Stern, Judy Langlois, Louise Menlo, Mary
Ross Taylor, Mike and Sue Sharlot, Mitch Berman and Ingrid Johanson,
Dick and Inga Markovits, Richard Meier, Alexis Palmer, Willy
Forbath and Judy Coffin, Jolyn Piercy, Aletha Huston, Nora England,
David and Sarah Stromeyer, Zipporah Wiseman, Anne Lewis, Andy
Rogers, Virginia
Carmichael, Cynthia Levinson, the Springer Motors book club, and many
more.
And family. To Alison and Joel, I simply want to say that I am in
awe -- in utter awe -- of your strength and love and so deeply grateful
for what you have done and who you are. To Carlota's cousin, Harry
Phillips, who has known Carlota the longest, and came
here under very difficult circumstances of Marge's illness, but as
always, is there. To my
brother Martin, from Honolulu and my sister Carolyn, who also came here
under great travel burdens and care-giving responsibilities. I am
deeply
grateful for your love and support.
And gratitude to Carlota, my lovely creature, who made me a lucky
man by making a life with me. She taught me generosity ...
and connectedness ... and wretched excess ... and humility. I first met
her in 1982 at Isabel Marcus's hot tub down the street on
Bridle Path from where we now live -- modestly clad, of course -- and
fully radiant. Pat
Cain, Jan Summer, Bea Ann Smith and others knew that place so well.
Then we
slowly became friends in the mid-1980s, and then better friends. Then
our romance blossomed forth in May, 1990 in Jerusalem, and we were
married in 1996 in Carlota's house on Waterston Street (which also had
a hot tub, but this one with a painted cover by Malou Flatou,
commissioned of course, by Carlota) on a warm and sunny day in June and
then all the years since.
Let me give you three or four vignettes of Carlota. The first is a
tooled leather album that Carlota created at age 14 after a trip to
Mexico. She took the photos and strung captions between them.
Remarkable both in the clarity of the shots and the writing, I am
especially taken by the scenes at Xachimilco, before commercialized
tourism had set in. There are photos of the boats poling them along and
one of a pig by the muddy side of the water. Here is what Carlota said
in her captions -- one of the pictures is of the pig.
"One of our 'side-trips' was to Xachimilco, the famous floating
gardens. We went on a week-day, so all was quiet and serene, and we
were poled along in our little boat, stopping to eat some delicious
tacos, bought from a woman in another boat, and to admire the scenery.
It was hot and we thought the pig very sensible to be rooting in the
mud."
"The pig ... very sensibly rooting in the mud" is pure Carlota, and
already so at 14.
Carlota was an only child and not happy as one. When she met Jane
Stern, another only child, they became inseparable sisters. Jane has
been part of Carlota's life since 1951, and I now treasure Jane as a
close friend. They had a third close friend at Radcliffe, Jane Cohen,
who also married a Robertson. She visited in March, but sent this email
for today:
"As you may know, Carlota really changed my life. It was of course
not only that she punctured Ayn Rand forever for me when we were
freshmen at Radcliffe. Or that Jim and I spent our first whole night
together under her auspices. Or that she couldn't drive for weeping
after she, Jane, and I saw Wuthering Heights together. Or that she put
me on the path to Linguistics. It was all those things and her endless
kindness over the many years of Jim's decline and death. She put up
with my inability to get a plan right and follow through on it for all
that time when I could only concentrate on my own narrow concerns, just
with her endless friendship, understanding, and support."
I am struck by the thought of the brightest young women of that
generation discussing ideas and Carlota already "puncturing" the too
easy thought of Ayn Rand (of whom I and countless others were
enamoured) and then sobbing over Olivier's performance in Wuthering
Heights.
Another email is from Tony Woodbury, who was in Latin America and not able to return, but who responded almost instantaneously with a warm message that captures so much of Carlota and touched me to the quick:
"I have known Carlota since I came here in 1980; and I met her
briefly before that, in 1974, when I was an undergraduate. She has been
such a dazzling presence; and I felt that as I knew her in different
ways -- as new faculty member, as colleague, as reader of her work, as
chair, and as fellow teacher -- there was always more to her, always
something different, something new, and something exciting. And in this
last year, and this last semester, I really saw something so special --
such warmth, such a spirit of giving, and such a commitment to life."
Carlota struck all of us with her range. She was comfortable with
artists and poets, and physicists, and of course psychologists and law
professors, and brought some of each world in contact with the other.
She also had cultural range. Sometimes I think she had a special
affinity for women from Arkansas: Judy Langlois is from Arkansas, as is
Mary Ross Taylor, and Dee Buffington, and also Gloria Weisenberger,
from the book
group. You would think that Carlota would have very little to say to
Gloria, from a Southern church-going milieu and Carlota from Greenwich
Village and the Linguistics Department at U.T. Yet here is Gloria's
email to me:
"It was entirely due to Carlota's gentle prodding that the book
group agreed to reexamine the classics of world literature -- 30-40
years away from college. She knew well that the breadth and depth of
life experiences would enhance our appreciation. Indeed, we became her
debtors. In spite of her prodigious intellect and scholarly
achievements, Carlota was generous with her praise -- she had a
sympathetic heart and was a patient listener to mistaken opinions (and
non sequiturs). ... She won my heart with her broad and deep capacity
for merriment. In spite of our diverse cultural backgrounds -- NYC vs.
Arkansas -- Carlota and I shared not a few fits of giggling."
Finally, I want to talk about poetry. Poetry was one of our bonds
and one of Carlota's beauties. We have been members of a poetry group
for years. When Carlota became ill, she fell away from poetry. Despite
her illness and the treatment she continued to do linguistics all out
for 2 full years. Yet she lost the ability -- or interest -- to connect
with the subtlety of poetry. But slowly she came back to it, and
started attending sessions again. We had not hosted a meeting for
nearly two years, and Carlota insisted that we do our turn. Eight days
before she died we had a session of the poetry group at our house. Here
is one of the poems that Carlota read that night:
Dirge in Woods
by George Meredith (1829-1909)
A wind sways the
pines,
And below
Not a breath of wild air;
Still as the mosses that glow
On the flooring and over the
lines
Of the roots here and there.
The pine-tree drops its dead;
They are quiet, as under the sea.
Overhead, overhead
Rushes life in a race,
As the clouds the clouds chase;
And we go,
And we drop like the fruits of
the tree,
Even we,
Even so.
Eight days before she too would go, she left us this gem to help us
mourn and then heal her loss.
I look at the pictures of Carlota and family now arrayed in our
kitchen from these last
months. With Alison and Joel, Rosemary and Ari, and Sylvia and Alan.
She is smiling and
her warmth suffuses the room. .... My heart is
broken... but I am warmed by Carlota's presence and I am smiling
with
her.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reception and Remembrances
top of page obituary memorial service memories
(山勢盤陀真 是畫
Shān shì pán túo zhēn shì hùa,
泉 流它姿逡成書
Quán líu tā zī qūn chéng shū.)We send our
deepest condolences to Carlota’s family,
friends, colleagues and the Department of Linguistics at UT Austin,
where I
received my BA in the 1980s when Carlota was Department Chair. Carlota’s outstanding achievements as a
scholar of tense and aspect, and as a leading woman academic have
always been
inspiring. Her work in the theory of aspect has been most influential,
and has
become a classic. Especially meaningful to me was the way she
illuminated
Chinese aspect. Carlota was one of the
most admirable linguists that I have looked up to in my own career.
In
We take the
opportunity to celebrate an extraordinary life
lived with passion and kindness. As a tribute to Carlota, we reflect
with her
once more on the subject of time:
|
To
everything there is a season, |
|
Ecclesiastes
3:1-4 |
Carlota, Stephen and Virginia in Hong Kong, 2004
Carlota simply had a talent for living to the fullest, for staying
intellectually alive, engaged with people, and appreciative of art and
beauty to the very last. I saw her a month before she died; and
she was exactly the same as she’d always been. It is almost
impossible for me to believe that I’ll never see her again--she was far
too alive ever to die.
~~~Helen Aristar-Dry, Department of
Linguistics, ILIT, Eastern Michigan University
Remembering Carlota
Smith
to appear in the UT Center for Women's and Gender Studies Spring
2007 newsletter
~~~Gretchen Ritter, Center for
Women's and Gender Studies, UT Austin
One of the advantages
of academic life is that you get to meet people from all over the
world. You
don't necessarily get to know them very well, but sometimes, despite
this, you
meet someone whose is so special that the meeting illuminates your life
in someway.
Carlota was one of these people. I met
her in
~~~Susan Rothstein, Gonda
Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
One of the most endearing aspects of Carlota was
her robust optimism, which saw her through many difficult times. There
was a sign in the kitchen in her house on Patterson which said (though
I don't remember the exact words) that life is basically beautiful and
if there are problems you just deal with them. Many people have already
said that Carlota was able to share with them the various diffculties
in their lives, and that they were able to get through these times
helped by her kind and insightful attention. I certainly felt this,
whether because of job problems, or in wrestling with drafts of papers.
She read these papers, even if the topic or the theory weren't exactly
her cup of tea, and she always had eminently reasonable suggestions. I
am glad that her written work is available for continuing the
discussion of her ideas.
Most recently, we shared the experience of living with cancer, which we
agreed was highly inconvenient and not at all what we had planned in
our busy schedules. One of our last conversations, over an icecream
cone, was on this topic. It's characteristic of Carlota that this
conversation was the greatest fun, and I will treasure the memory of
that afternoon. Carlota took her illness as an opportunity to live her
life as her best self, and she did.
~~~ Alice Davison, U. of Iowa
~~~ Haj Ross, University of North Texas
La disparition de Carlota nous affecte profondément,
c'était une amie de très longue date avec laquelle nous
avions noué des relations plus qu'amicales, fraternelles. Notre
première rencontre avec elle date de l'hiver 1967, à
Philadelphie chez le Pr. Zellig Harris auprès duquel Carlota
terminait sa thèse et où l'un de nous (Andrée)
suivait des cours pour quelques mois, sur la recommandation du Pr.
Marco Schützenberger.
A partir de cette première rencontre et tout au long de ces années, nous n'avons jamais cessé de nous voir, soit à l'occasion d'un séjour aux USA, soit plus fréquemment en France, parce que Carlota venait passer des vacances avec nous, à Marseille, à Toulouse, en Normandie... Sa générosité, sa profonde humanité, la chaleur de son attention et de son amitié nous manqueront cruellement. Nous voudrions dire à John, son compagnon, à Allison et Joel, ses enfants, que nous partageons leur chagrin. Qu'ils sachent que Carlota nous était précieuse et que nous garderons vivace son émouvant souvenir.
~~~ Andreé et Mario
Borillo; Pr. Emérite à l'Université de Toulouse-Le
Mirail, Directeur de Recherche Emérite au CNRS (respectively)
I was teaching French at Swarthmore when
Carlota arrived, as a young faculty wife, with a baby the same age as mine.
Over the years we talked while our children played together. We both
lived through some difficult times; she was incredibly generous with
her help when I needed it.
All the while, as Carlota turned to linguistics,
our conversations gave me new, and very exciting insights into the
study of literature. Eventually we decided to work together in
a study of Flaubert's wonderful “conte”, Un Coeur
Simple. We had great fun analyzing the subtle effects of the gender
of nouns and pronouns. We produced two versions of the paper.
One, “Interpreting ellipses in a text”, written by Carlota,
was sent to a linguistics journal. “Paper II”, as Carlota
called it, I wrote for a literary audience, with Carlota's input on
the specifically linguistics portions. It was published in Language
and Style in 1984, as “Some Significant Omissions: Ellipses
in Flaubert's ‘Un Coeur Simple’.” In one of the last
e-mails I received from her, Carlota wrote: “A couple of us put on
a very nice little workshop, Literature and Linguistics, just last week.”
We will all miss Carlota's sensitive insights in this field. My best
wishes to her colleagues who are carrying on.
Carlota lived with me in Norton, MA, the year she taught at Brown. I am so grateful for those months, and for many others through the years, of great companionship, and great cooking. I deeply miss my most gracious friend, Carlota.
I took syntax from Carlota in the Spring of 1998. I was a linguistic anthropologist with interests in Southern Athabaskan languages. My advisor, Joel Sherzer, had encouraged me to take the class. Here is something I remember from that class. Towards the end of the semester a number of students decided to throw Carlota an end of semester surprise party. The class had been difficult, but Carlota's basic goodness, humanity, and good humor had always been present. When she came into class that day, she appeared very surprised, and I think, quite touched (my memory now is of tears in her eyes). She invited the class to her house after the final for another party. Since then, as my research changed from Apache to Navajo, she was there to support and always show an interest in what I was doing. I remember fondly visiting with her while I was doing fieldwork in 2001 on The Navajo Nation and she was at the Navajo Language Academy outside Gallup, NM. In early spring of 2007 she wrote a letter of reference for me to the American Philosophical Society for a grant, and we corresponded briefly in May after I had gotten the grant. Then she was gone. For me, though, the memory of Carlota that I enjoy the most, is the look on her face that day we threw a surprise party for her in our syntax class.
top of
page
obituary
memorial service
memories