|
References
Slides
Numerals Project
Numerals Links
ACCOUNTING WITH TOKENS IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST
Small clay tokens of multiple shapes found in Near Eastern sites of
8000-3000 B.C. constitute the earliest evidence for accounting (Schmandt-Besserat 1996).
The tokens had two main functions: they served as counters to calculate
quantities of goods; they were mnemonic devices used to store data. In this
paper I will discuss this latter function: 1. How accounting was practiced
with tokens, and 2. how accounting was related to sociopolitical changes.
I. Accounting Before Writing
The study of tokens may give an insight into several aspects of
accounting before the invention of writing and, in particular, what information was
kept, where, how, by whom, and for how long.
1. What Information Was Kept
The hypothesis that there was an evolution, from tokens to the
Sumerian pictographic writing, allows the meaning of a number of counters to be
established. The tokens matching Sumerian pictographs stood for units of
merchandise, suggesting that each counter stood for a specific unit of a
commodity such as, for example, a particular measure of grain, a jar of oil
or a fleece of wool. Consequently, it appears that the token system was
restricted to the recording of exclusively economic data.
It is noteworthy that the goods recorded with tokens changed over the
millennia. When the token system came about, ca. 8000 B.C., the first
assemblages of counters consisted mainly of cones, spheres, disks, and
cylinders
(See Slide 1)
that stood for quantities of grain and livestock. In other words,
the earliest tokens probably recorded the most basic staples.
These plain tokens continued to be used to the very end of the system
in the third millennium. About 3500 B.C., however, "complex tokens,"
characterized by multiple new shapes and markings, appeared in cities. The
majority of these stood apparently for finished products, such as bread, oil,
perfume, wool and rope, and for items produced in workshops such as metal,
bracelets, types of cloths, garments, mats, pieces of furniture, tools and a
variety of stone and pottery vessels. The object of accounting varied,
therefore, in the course of time. At first it dealt with the products of the
farm and the country and, later, with goods manufactured in cities.
2. Where Data Was Stored
When tokens were recovered within buildings, the structures
suggest that, from early on, accounting with tokens belonged to non-secular places. For
example, in the sixth millennium B.C. site of Hajji Firuz, Iran, a number of
cones were located in a house showing no trace of daily life activities,
such as cooking or flint chipping (Voigt 1983: 87; 181-184; H.F. 68-122, 68-170; 68-172, 68-189;
68-195).
The building also differed from the usual domestic architecture in other ways.
First, it was smaller, consisting of a single room, instead of the normal two-roomed units.
Second, unusual features, such as a low platform and two posts, were erected inside (Voigt 1983:47-49).
In sum, the structure that yielded most tokens at Hajji Firuz was apparently
serving a special non-domestic function.
In the fourth millennium B.C., public buildings that produced
tokens took the form of citadels or temple precincts. It seems revealing, for instance,
that among the 778 tokens excavated at Uruk, the first and most important
Sumerian city, 685 or 88.1% were excavated in the sacred precinct of the
goddess Inanna, the tutelary goddess. From the remaining 93 examples, 43 or
5.5% originated from a second shrine, the Anu temple, and only 50 or 6.4%
from the city's private quarters. The tokens from Uruk, therefore, can be
said to belong primarily to sanctuaries (Schmandt-Besserat 1992: 49-73).
The repeated occurrence of complex tokens in gate rooms, and in
particular temple gates, may also be singled out as being of particular significance.
In Habuba Kabira, Syria, for instance, the southern city gate, which led to
the Temple area, produced not only tokens, but other administrative material
such as cylinders and seals (Schmandt-Besserat, Forthcoming).
At Uruk, tokens were concentrated at the periphery of the religious precinct, and in particular,
in the eastern and western part of the temple area, where the gates to the precinct were
presumably located. Now, gateways to cities, temples and palaces have
traditionally been associated with administrative centers in the ancient Near East (Durand 1987: 44-48).
The Bible also alludes to the city gates as the location
where public procedures took place and where records were kept (Dearman 1989: 346).
The significance of the gateway in administration in historical as well as
prehistoric times may therefore explain why the temple gates are so often
depicted in ancient Near Eastern art. The two bundles of reeds, symbolizing
it, appear time and time again on seals (Moortgat 1988: 7, Pl. 2: 9; 5: 29b; 6: 30, 31)
and on many fourth millennium ritual stone vessels (Amiet 1977: 354-355, Figs. 231 & 236).
In particular, on a famous vase from Uruk, the Priest-King of Uruk was represented leading
a procession of offering bearers towards the temple gate, shown filled with goods (Lindemeyer & Martin 1993: No. 226, Plate 25 i).
3. The Quantity of Data Stored
Clusters of counters recovered in situ seem to indicate that the
accounts kept in archives by the means of tokens dealt with small quantities
of different kinds of commodities.
Tokens are frequently found in clusters varying in size from two to
about one hundred counters. In one case, for instance, thirty-five cones and
one sphere were nestled together (Prickett 1985: 539). Other Iranian sites produced small hoards of 2 to 37 tokens of mixed types tightly packed together. Yet another Iraqi excavation yielded a dozen clusters of 4 to 16 tokens (Jasim & Oates 1986: 352-355).
Finally in Syria, a room of Sabi Abyad produced 31 tokens and small groups of at
most 9 tokens were recovered in five different rooms of a large building of
Habuba Kabira. Furthermore, the token clusters were always composed of
several types of counters (Akkermans & Verhoeven 1995: 99, fig. 14; Schmandt-Besserat, forthcoming).
For example, Uruk produced a cache of 75 tokens, composed of spheres, large spheres, cones,
tetrahedrons and cylinders (Lenzen 1974: 40).
4. The Method of Accounting
The system worked according to the most simple and basic principle of
one-to-one correspondence which consisted in matching each unit of a set to
be recorded with a token. Accordingly, one jar of oil was shown by one
ovoid, six jars of oil by six ovoids, etc... (Fig. 1) There were seemingly
only a few tokens that stood for a collection of items, like the lentoid
disk which probably meant "a flock" (- perhaps 10 animals). The token system
did not allow one to express numbers abstractly. There was no token for
"one," "two" and "three" independently from the commodity counted.
The evolution of the token system seems to reflect an ever
increasing need for accuracy. This is exemplified, for example, by tokens dealing with
livestock: the early plain cylinders and lentoid disks apparently stood for
"heads of livestock" whereas the fourth millennium complex tokens indicated
the species, "fat-tail sheep;" the sex, "ewe;" and the age, "lamb." The
quantum jump in the number of token types and subtypes, which occurred in
large cities about 3500 B.C., seems therefore to indicate a concern for more
precise data.
5. Who Practiced Accounting
In rare, but significant instances, tokens were recovered in a
funerary setting. These findings may reveal who handled the tokens and practiced
accounting.
Among the thousands of graves dating from 8000 to 3000 B.C.
excavated in the Near East, only a dozen are known to have yielded tokens. In these
instances the counters were visibly restricted to the tombs of individuals
of high status, some richly furnished. In one case the interments held a
variety of alabaster vessels and ornaments of dentalia shells and carnelian (El-Wailly & Es-Soof 1965: 26-28). Three of the burials of the North Mesopotamian site of Tepe Gawra seem
particularly diagnostic. They were among the richest of the site, holding
gold rosettes and beads, precious vessels of obsidian, serpentine, electrum.
These particular tombs also included symbols of power such as maceheads and
lapis lazuli seals. Tomb 107 included special architectural features: a
shrine was erected above the burial of an obviously very prestigious
individual who held six stone spheres as his only funerary gift (Tobler 1950: 110-111). The rarity of funerary tokens, their association with luxurious
burial deposits, with artifacts symbolizing power and with special architecture,
seems to indicate that the counters did not belong to the masses, but were
the privilege of an elite.
6. How Long the Accounts Were Kept
An ancient rubbish pit of the fourth millennium B.C., excavated in
Iran may give an insight on the time span during which the accounts were kept. The
layers of trash that could be distinguished according to seasons revealed
that tokens were most often associated with early summer deposits. The
excavator noted, therefore, that the counters were discarded in the
traditional season for plenty, after the harvest and threshing, when the
crops would be stored (Wright, Miller & Redding 1980: 277).
This in turn, might suggest that transactions were made in the course of the year to be completed
at the time of the harvest. If this was so, the usual length of keeping accounts in archives
was less than a year.
II. Tokens and Socioeconomic Development
The fact that the first stage of the token system (plain tokens)
coincided with agriculture and the second (complex tokens) with urban formation,
seems of great significance. It clearly indicates that the evolution of
accounting coincided with major socioeconomic developments.
The appearance of the first token assemblages in 8000-7500 B.C.
suggests that the system of counting and record keeping of goods became necessary
when survival depended on domestication of grains and accumulation of the
products of harvests. In other words, the token system fulfilled new needs
for accounting brought about by agriculture, and data storage can be
considered as directly related to the "Neolithic Revolution."
The multiplication of token types and subtypes in the fourth
millennium B.C. was also not by chance. These complex tokens, which included many new
forms and which were characterized by bearing incised lines and punctations,
corresponded to the creation of cities. It can be presumed that the
creation of workshops, and the more diversified urban economy that followed,
required more accounting techniques.
It is likely, however, that the two major changes in the token
system were not mere corollaries of farming and cities but were determined by new
sociopolitical structures that derived from agriculture and urban
settlements. I propose that accounting may be related to the rise of an
elite. This idea is supported by three sets of data.
First, the creation of the token system coincided with a new
settlement pattern characterized by larger communities. For example, in an early
community in Syria, Mureybet, there is no evidence for the use of counters
in the two earliest phases of the site, about 8500-8000 B.C., when it was a
small compound of 0.5 ha. Tokens occur in the third phase, ca. 8000-7500
B.C. when the hamlet had grown to become a village covering 2 or 3 ha. It is
difficult to evaluate the size of the population of Mureybet III. It is
estimated, however, that the community then exceeded the number of
individuals manageable in an egalitarian system. In other words, in the case
of Mureybet, and probably elsewhere, the first token assemblage coincided
with the advent of rank society characterized by a new type of leadership
overseeing the community resources (Cauvin 1978: 74-75).
Second, as discussed above, the tokens recovered in the tombs of
prestigious individuals suggest that, from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age
(6000-3500 B.C.), the use of counters served as an instrument of power for
an elite controlling real goods.
Third, the fact that the complex tokens phenomenon took place at
the time of state formation was no coincidence. In all the major ancient Near Eastern
cities such as Uruk, Susa, Chogha Mish and Habuba Kabira the complex
counters occur in levels characterized by
1. seals and sealings featuring
the ruler (The Priest-king is represented on an oblong bulla from Habuba Kabira,
(72 Hb 102). I am grateful to Eva Strommenger for this communication; Amiet 1972: Pl. 18: 695);
2. public buildings built according to an identical plan and
decorated with typical mosaics (Jordan 1931: fig. 16-17; Steve & Gasche 1971: 151 & Pl. 89;
Delougaz & Kantor 1972: 27; Finet 1979: 93).
and 3. potteries which probably served as grain measures (Strommenger 1980: 485-486; le Breton 1957: 97-113; Delougaz & Kantor 1972: 26-33).
In other words, the administrative centers that yield
complex tokens were the seats of a large bureaucracy, housed in similar
buildings, using the same administrative devices--complex tokens, seals and
grain measures--and, most importantly, were headed by the same powerful
ruler. The complex tokens can be considered, therefore, as being part and
parcel of the bureaucracy used by the Sumerian king to govern and control
real goods in the first city-states.
The appearance of tokens in the earliest rank societies, their
inclusion in rich burials, and the place of the complex tokens in the state bureaucracy,
suggest that, from the beginning, accounting was the privilege of an elite
and that the more the system became efficient and precise, the more power it wielded.
Conclusion
A faint sketch of the places and people associated with ancient
accounting begins to emerge. Counting and data storage with tokens started
in open air compounds where subsistence was based on cultivating or, at
least, hoarding cereals. Their first purpose was to record quantities of
the traditional Near Eastern staples: grain and small stock. In the fourth
millennium B.C. complex tokens kept track of manufactured goods in large
centers. Starting in the sixth millennium, tokens are recurrently found in
public buildings. The clusters of tokens found in situ range usually between
a dozen to 75 artifacts, showing that the counters were never kept in large
quantities. There is some evidence that the counters were mostly discarded
during the summer, after the harvest. Tokens, together with other status
symbols, are sometimes included in the burials of prestigious individuals,
suggesting that they were used by the elite who controlled the economy of
redistribution.
REFERENCES
SLIDES
SLIDES
|