Profile
David Kirk
Associate Professor — Ph.D., University of Chicago
Contact
- E-mail: dkirk@prc.utexas.edu
- Phone: 512-471-0141
- Office: CLA 2.406C
- Campus Mail Code: G1800
Biography
David S. Kirk (Ph.D., Sociology, University of Chicago) is Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and a Faculty Research Associate of the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin. Kirk's research agenda is primarily organized around three inter-related themes: first, the legitimacy of the law and the effects of illegitimacy on crime and the willingness of residents to cooperate with the police; second, the effect of neighborhood culture and conditions on criminal and delinquent behavior; and third, prisoner reentry and the consequences of housing and parole policies for offender reintegration. One recent study examined the detrimental consequences of punitive enforcement of immigration laws on public cooperation with the police in immigrant communities. Kirk's recent research has appeared in American Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, Criminology, and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
SOC F321K • Demography Crime & Punishment
88143 •
Summer 2013
Meets
MTWTHF 1000am-1130am CLA 3.106
show description
Descripton:
This class will cover data sources and conceptual and measurement issues surrounding the study of racial and ethnic differences in crime and punishment, with a particular focus on understanding how the distinct neighborhood and school contexts in which different racial and ethnic groups participate explain variations in criminal outcomes (e.g., offending, arrest, and incarceration). Additional attention will be given to the role of the criminal justice system in producing and eliminating disparities in criminal justice outcomes.
SOC 366 • Deviance
46190 •
Spring 2011
Meets
TTH 930am-1100am BUR 216
show description
Course Description
Social deviance is an important and contested concept in the discipline of sociology. While deviants, by definition, exist on the margins of society, there is much that can be learned in these margins about how our society functions. Through the study of deviance and deviants, sociologists have sought to address a broad range of complex questions about how human societies operate, including: How is social order maintained?, Who has social power and how is this social power used?, How do individuals negotiate their identities?, etc. In this course, we will address these larger questions through the consideration of various forms of deviant behavior (including alcohol and drug use, crime, sexual and physical deviance). We will consider theories that attempt to make sense of deviance in our society, the variation of deviant definitions across time and space, how social power is used to shape notions of deviance and how these notions become translated into practices that impact the lives of those dubbed as deviant, and, finally, how those defined as deviant negotiate their deviant identity.
Grading Policy
Three exams worth 100 points each
4 short reports worth 25 points each
Participation/Attendance worth 50 points
Total points available: 450
Texts
Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context and Interaction, edited by Patricia Adler and Peter Adler, 2009, 6th edition
Erich Goode, Deviance in Everyday Life, 2002
Additional articles may be assigned and will be made available on Blackboard
iClicker
SOC 396N • Theories Of Crime Causation
46655 •
Spring 2010
Meets
T 300pm-600pm BUR 480
show description
THEORIES OF CRIME CAUSATION
SOCIOLOGY 396N
Spring 2010
Burdine 480
Tuesdays 3:00-6:00
Instructor: Professor David Kirk
Burdine 478
512-471-0192
Office Hours: By Appointment
I. Rationale:
What (if anything) motivates an individual to commit acts of crime? Conversely, why do people obey the law? Why do some individuals break the law even if they agree with the substance of the law? Questions such as these have bedeviled social thinkers for centuries. This course seeks to engage students in a thoughtful, in-depth examination of these questions, focusing attention on the major sociological theories of crime causation.
II. Format and Procedures:
This course is organized as a seminar, with some lecture integrated with considerable discussion of readings and ideas. In my opinion, the best way to develop an understanding of the material covered in the course is to read it carefully and thoughtfully, and then to discuss it and write about it. Therefore, emphasis will be placed on class participation and critically written work on the topics covered in the class. Students are expected to read and contemplate the required readings prior to each class session. Any questions you may have about reading materials should be brought up during class time to facilitate discussion.
The major requirements for the course are participation in class discussions (20%), a 15 page paper due April 20th (20%), a mid-term exam (30%), and a non-cumulative final exam (30%). As part of the class participation requirement, students will take turns leading seminar discussions. Depending on the number of students in the class, each student will lead the discussion probably twice in the semester. Discussion leaders will (1) briefly review the assigned readings; (2) prepare discussion questions about key points to elicit participation from the rest of the class; and (3) moderate the ensuing discussion. It is expected that discussion leaders will have a firm command of the material when leading class discussion, and therefore may find it highly advantageous to undertake additional (i.e., non-assigned) readings in preparation for the class. If you would like additional readings, please ask.
More information on assignments will be provided in class. Grades will be determined as follows:
(A) (90-100%) (D) (60-69%)
(B) (80-89%) (F) (below 60%)
(C) (70-79%)
III. Required Course Books (see that last page of the syllabus for a list of assigned journal articles, available in print or electronically through the library):
Gottfredson, Michael, and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sampson, Robert J., and John H. Laub. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shaw, Clifford R. 1930. The Jack-Roller: A Delinquent Boy's Own Story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, Tom. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Venkatesh, Sudhir Alladi. 2008. Gang Leader for a Day. New York: Penguin Press.
Warr, Mark. 2002. Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Strongly Recommended
Wallace, Walter L. 1971. The Logic of Science in Sociology. New York: Aldine. Available at the PCL.
IV. Academic Integrity
University of Texas Honor Code
The core values of The University of Texas at Austin are learning, discovery, freedom, leadership, individual opportunity, and responsibility. Each member of the university is expected to uphold these values through integrity, honesty, trust, fairness, and respect toward peers and community.
Each student in this course is expected to abide by the University of Texas Honor Code. Any work submitted by a student in this course for academic credit will be the student's own work. You are encouraged to study together and to discuss information and concepts covered in lecture and the sections with other students. However, this permissible cooperation should never involve one student having possession of a copy of all or part of work done by someone else. Should copying occur, both the student who copied work from another student and the student who gave material to be copied will both automatically receive a zero for the assignment. Penalty for violation of this Code can also be extended to include failure of the course and University disciplinary action. During examinations, you must do your own work. Talking or discussion is not permitted during the examinations, nor may you compare papers, copy from others, or collaborate in any way. Any collaborative behavior during the examinations will result in failure of the exam, and may lead to failure of the course and University disciplinary action.
V. Other University Notices and Policies
Use of E-mail for Official Correspondence to Students
All students should become familiar with the University's official e-mail student notification policy. It is the student's responsibility to keep the University informed as to changes in his or her e-mail address. Students are expected to check e-mail on a frequent and regular basis in order to stay current with University-related communications, recognizing that certain communications may be time-critical. It is recommended that e-mail be checked daily, but at a minimum, twice per week. The complete text of this policy and instructions for updating your e-mail address are available at http://www.utexas.edu/its/policies/emailnotify.html.
Religious Holy Days
By UT Austin policy, you must notify me of your pending absence at least fourteen days prior to the date of observance of a religious holy day. If you must miss a class, an examination, a work assignment, or a project in order to observe a religious holy day, I will give you an opportunity to complete the missed work within a reasonable time after the absence.
Students with Disabilities
Any student with a documented disability who requires academic accommodations should contact Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) at (512) 471-6259 (voice) or 1-866-329-3986 (video phone). Faculty are not required to provide accommodations without an official accommodation letter from SSD.
Behavior Concerns Advice Line (BCAL)
If you are worried about someone who is acting differently, you may use the Behavior Concerns Advice Line to discuss by phone your concerns about another individual’s behavior. This service is provided through a partnership among the Office of the Dean of Students, the Counseling and Mental Health Center (CMHC), the Employee Assistance Program (EAP), and The University of Texas Police Department (UTPD). Call 512-232-5050 or visit http://www.utexas.edu/safety/bcal.
VII. Tentative Course Schedule
|
Week |
Week of |
Topic |
Readings |
|
1 |
Jan19 |
Course Introduction
|
|
|
2 |
Jan 26 |
Deterrence |
Becker (1968); Erickson, Gibbs, and Jensen (1977); Nagin (1998)
|
|
3 |
Feb2 |
Legitimacy of the Law and Legal Cynicism |
Tyler (2006), Why People Obey the Law
|
|
4 |
Feb9 |
Special Topic: Race/Ethnic Disparities in Criminal Outcomes
|
Black and Reiss (1970); Jackson and Carroll (1981); Liska and Chamlin (1984); Smith (1986); Stults and Baumer (2007)
|
|
5 |
Feb16 |
Strain Theories |
Merton (1938); Agnew (1991; 2001)
|
|
6 |
Feb23
|
Social Disorganization |
Bursik (1988); Sampson and Groves (1989); Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls (1997); Sampson (2006)
|
|
7 |
Mar2
|
Special Topic: Broken Windows |
Wilson and Kelling (1982); Sampson and Raudenbush (1999); Harcourt and Ludwig (2006)
|
|
8
|
Mar9 |
** MID-TERM EXAM **
|
|
|
9 |
Mar16
|
SPRING BREAK
|
|
|
10 |
Mar23 |
Differential Association and Social Learning
|
Warr (2002), Companions in Crime
|
|
11 |
Mar30 |
Special Topic: Street Gangs |
Venkatesh (2008), Gang Leader for a Day
|
|
12 |
Apr6 |
Social Control Theory |
Reiss (1951); Toby (1957); Hindelang (1973)
|
|
13 |
Apr13
|
Self-Control |
Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990), A General Theory of Crime; Pratt and Cullen (2000)
|
|
14 |
Apr20
|
NO CLASS |
|
|
15 |
Apr27
|
Life-Course |
Shaw (1930), The Jack Roller; Sampson and Laub (1993), Crime in the Making
|
|
16 |
May4 |
** FINAL EXAM **
|
|
Note: book titles in italics; otherwise the listed reading is an article (see handout)
Publications
Click on the document title to open the publication:
Restore Rundberg
Restore Rundberg is a neighborhood revitalization initiative in North Austin. This work is funded by a $1 million Byrne Criminal Justice Innovation grant from the U.S. Department of Justice. The Byrne program is part of President Obama's Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative. One component of Restore Rundberg is innovation in evidence-based law enforcement strategies and crime prevention in the Rundberg community.
David Kirk is a research partner to the Restore Rundberg initiative. On this site, Kirk will post research related products from the initiative. Click on the document titles below for more information.
Crime Prevention Research Questions
National Institute of Justice: Five Principles of Law Enforcement


