Skip Navigation
UT wordmark
College of Liberal Arts wordmark
sociology masthead
Christine L. Williams, Chair CLA 3.306, Mailcode A1700, Austin, TX 78712 • 512-232-6300

Mark D. Hayward

Professor Ph.D., Indiana University, Bloomington

Director, PRC; Professor of Sociology & Centennial Commission Professor in the Liberal Arts
Mark D. Hayward

Contact

Biography

Mark Hayward's primary research interests center on the influence of life course exposures and events on the morbidity and mortality experiences of the older population. Presently, he is involved in several studies focusing on the origins of health disparities at older ages: early life influences on socioeconomic, race and gender disparities in adult morbidity and mortality, the demography of race/ethnic and gender disparities in healthy life expectancy; social inequality in the biomarkers of aging, and the health consequences of marriage, divorce, and widowhood. Recent publications have focused on changes in morbidity and mortality determining trends in healthy life expectancy, socioeconomic and race/ethnic differences in healthy life expectancy, the association between childhood health and adult morbidity, and the socioeconomic origins of the race gap in chronic disease morbidity. His recently published work has appeared in the American Sociological Review, Demography, the Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, the Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Journal of Marriage and the Family, and Social Science and Medicine.

Professional and Scholarly Awards and Achievements:
Recent Grants: "Center on Population Health and Aging" (NIA), "The Racial Burden of Chronic Disease" (NIA), "Active Life Expectancy in the Older Population" (NIA), "Chronic Health Problems and Retirement" (NIA), Population Research Center Core Grant (NICHD)
Associate Editor: (1994-2006) Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences; (1995-present) Research on Aging; (1998-2000, 2006-2008) Journal of Health and Social Behavior; (2007-2009) Demography; (2009-2011) Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Council Member, ASA Section on Aging and the Life Course (1998-2001)
Founding Member, Board, Brookdale Institute on Aging
Council Member, National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging, University of Michigan (2000-2003)
Member, National Longitudinal Surveys Technical Review Committee, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2000-2005)
Board of Directors, Population Association of America (2001-2004)
Member. Board of Overseers of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (2002-2008)
ICPSR Council Member and Chair (2003-2006)
Vice President, Association of Population Centers (2005-07)
Board of Directors, Society of Biodemography and Social Biology (2004-2009)
President, Southern Demographic Association (2010-2011)

NIH Biosketch

Interests

Life course origins of health disparities, morbidity and mortality, biodemography

SOC 389K • Demography Hlth/Life Crse

45730 • Fall 2012
Meets M 1200pm-300pm MAI 1704
show description

COURSE CONTENT:

This course is intended to provide an in-depth introduction to the major conceptual frameworks and empirical research examining distal and proximate social factors influencing adult health. The underlying question is – “Does the body forget insults and exposures from adverse social conditions over the life course?” In grappling with this question, we will pay close attention to the intersection between the etiology of adult health conditions and the major life-course trajectories of socioeconomic position and family. Of major importance will be the assessment of key social and biological pathways linking social conditions at particular points in the life course with adult health outcomes. 

REQUIREMENTS:

The course is organized as a seminar. Although I will provide overviews and/or supplemental material in lecture, much instruction takes place in the context of guided discussion and exchanges focused on the readings. Students are expected to attend each class and to have read all of the assigned material thoroughly and critically before the class meeting. Reading critically means not only being able to describe the content of an assigned piece, but also to evaluate the scientific issues motivating the research question, the conceptual/theoretical strengths of the research, the adequacy of the study’s methods, the scientific implications of the study’s findings, and the study’s relation to other course material). Students are strongly encouraged to contribute to the discussion both their insights and/or questions from the readings and their own experiences. There are two major tasks to be accomplished in this graduate seminar:

1) The first task involves preparation of the reading for class presentation and discussion. All students are responsible for all of the assigned readings. Class discussions will be oriented around informal student presentations based on the assigned readings. For each class meeting, a student will be assigned an article, and the student will informally present the scientific factors motivating a study, the key gaps in knowledge being addressed, the major findings, and the conceptual/methodological strengths and weaknesses of the study. An outline of the presentation’s key points (1 page) should be distributed to the class on the Tuesday prior to class. The informal presentations should not be longer than 15 minutes – and 10 minutes is desirable!

(20% of grade)

2) The second task is an empirical study on a topic that is relevant to the course’s overall aim. Two assignments are required in accomplishing this task: a poster presentation and a term paper. The empirical study may overlap with research being done either as part of a student’s thesis/dissertation research, in conjunction with work being done in another course (with the permission). The study should be original research, with the aims of making a scientific contribution to the literature and eventual publication in a scientific outlet. Given the time constraints imposed by the semester, I recommend that students rely on publicly accessible datasets (e.g., the Health and Retirement Survey, the National Health Interview Surveys, the National Longitudinal Surveys, Americans’ Changing Lives, and Aging, Status, Sense of Control). Other rich datasets are available from NACDA and ICPSR, two major electronic data archives. Students are required to discuss their topic with me before moving forward. Students should submit 1-page abstracts. . I will use the abstract to gauge the paper’s topic  relevance to the course aims, and as a basis to provide critical feedback to refine conceptual ideas and focus the analysis.

1) Poster presentation:  These sessions will give students a chance to present their work to their colleagues, to field comments,and to refine their ideas and analysis prior to submitting the term paper. Posters should followthe format that one would use if presenting the results at a major scientific meetings such as the Population Association of America. However, you do not actually need to construct an actualposter. Poster “pages” should be constructed using Powerpoint for presentation to the class.

(30% of grade)

2) Term paper  should aim to be a publishable scientific work suitable for submission to a scientific journal such as Demography. Students should review articles in Demography or other major journals for guidance on presentation styles and organizational format. (50% of grade)

 

SOC 389K • Event History Analysis

45730 • Spring 2012
Meets W 300pm-600pm MAI 1704
show description

DESCRIPTION: 

This course provides an in-depth introduction to survival methods for the analysis of change in time-dependent discrete dependent variables. The course draws on methodological and empirical research from the social sciences. Special attention is directed at the relationship between theories of social change, life course attainment and dynamic models. Moreover, we will examine alternative data collection strategies to obtain longitudinal data. Examples and homework assignments will draw principally on three data sets: the German Life History Study (GLHS), the National Longitudinal Survey of Older Men, and the National Health Interview Surveys. 

The course begins by focusing on simple stochastic processes for qualitative variables. We do so through the lens of non-parametric, discrete-time life table techniques. The topics include basic life table relations, single- and multiple-decrement life table models, and increment-decrement life table models. The purpose is to learn how to describe increasingly complex dynamic social processes. We then turn to continuous-time, discrete-state models. Parametric and partially parametric models will be introduced which allow for the dependency of rates on both explanatory factors and time. We will briefly examine some special topics including competing risk models, local hazard models, unobserved sources of heterogeneity in hazard models, and continuous state-space hazard models. The purpose of this aspect of the course is to communicate the variety and power of multivariate hazard models for hypothesis testing of social science processes. 

PREREQUISITES: 

Students should have completed the graduate statistics core sequence in sociology (or the equivalent) and have a thorough knowledge of the general linear model. A background in log-linear analysis and logistic regression is important, because hazard models are part of the class of log-linear models. Students must have a solid knowledge of a major spreadsheet package (e.g., EXCEL) for computing and graphing. 

REQUIREMENTS: 

In addition to reading required materials, attending class sessions, and contributing in class, students must complete three sets of written assignments. First, homework occasionally will be assigned. Homework assignments will involve both numerical problem solving and critical writing. The second and third written requirements are the mid-term and final exams. Both exams will be take-home exams involving longitudinal data analysis. The basic aim of the exams is to educate you about how one goes about formulating, estimating, and interpreting event history models. Grades will be based on the two exams (45% each) and the homework 

(10%). I also will evaluate the homework assignments to identify concepts or techniques that are problematic. 

I am also offering the option of writing an empirical paper using event history techniques in lieu of taking the final exam. If you choose this option, you will need to inform me immediately after the mid-term exam. 

READINGS: 

The technical literature on survival analysis is voluminous, spanning a variety of fields. For example, partial likelihood hazard models were developed primarily within biostatistics, while the much of the development of parametric hazard models took place within sociology and economics. Starting in the late 1980s, a literature emerged which places these different traditions within a more general survival analysis framework. A major work in this vein is the book, Event History Analysis (Blossfeld, Hamerle, and Mayer, 1989). This text also shows how to estimate hazard models using a variety of software packages (e.g., SAS). More recently Techniques of Event History Modeling was published (Blossfeld and Rohwer, 1995, 2002); this is a comprehensive introduction to continuous-time event history techniques. The 2002 2nd edition is the core text for this course. 

The textbook has been ordered by the UT bookstore. The full title is: 

Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Götz Rohwer. 2002. Techniques of Event History Modeling. Second Edition. Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

If you are a Stata user and plan to use event history models extensively in your work, you might want to consider ordering a version of this text that uses Stata to generate the examples shown in the text. The text is: 

Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Katrin Golsch, and Götz Rohwer. 2007. Event History Analysis with Stata. Mahway, New Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

SOC 389K • Demog Of Health & Life Course

46260 • Spring 2011
Meets W 300pm-600pm MAI 1704
show description

Course Description

This course provides an in-depth introduction to the major conceptual frameworks and empirical research examining distal and proximate social factors influencing adult health. The underlying question is – “Does the body forget insults and exposures from adverse social as well as beneficial conditions over the life course?” Close attention is paid to the intersection between the etiology of health conditions and the major life-course trajectories of socioeconomic status and family. Of major importance will be the assessment of key social and biological pathways linking social conditions at particular points in the life course with adult health outcomes.

REQUIREMENTS: The course is organized as a seminar. Most of the instruction takes place in the context of guided discussion and exchanges focused on the readings. Students are expected to attend each class and to have read all of the assigned material thoroughly and critically. Reading critically means not only being able to describe the content of an assigned piece, but also to evaluate the scientific issues motivating the research question, the conceptual/theoretical strengths of the research, the adequacy of the study’s methods, the scientific implications of the study’s findings, and the study’s relation to other course material). Students are strongly encouraged to contribute to the discussion both their insights and/or questions from the readings and their own experiences.

There are two major tasks to be accomplished in this graduate seminar: 1) The first task involves preparation of the reading for class presentation and discussion. All students are responsible for all of the assigned readings. Class discussions will be oriented around informal student presentations based on the assigned readings. For each class meeting, a student will be assigned an article, and the student will informally present the scientific factors motivating a study, the key gaps in knowledge being addressed, the major findings, and the conceptual/methodological strengths and weaknesses of the study. An outline of the presentation’s key points (1 page) should be distributed to the class on the Tuesday prior to class. The informal presentations should not be longer than 15 minutes – and 10 minutes is desirable! (20% of grade)

2) The second task is an empirical study on a topic that is relevant to the course’s overall aim. Two assignments are required in accomplishing this task: a poster presentation (30% of grade) and a term paper (50% of grade). The empirical study may overlap with research being done either as part of a student’s thesis/dissertation research, in conjunction with work being done in another course (with the professor’s permission), or as part of a student’s RA assignment (with the professor’s permission). The study should be original research, with the aims of making a scientific contribution to the literature and eventual publication in a scientific outlet.

Given the time constraints imposed by the semester, I recommend that students rely on publicly accessible datasets (e.g., the Health and Retirement Survey, the National Health Interview Surveys, the National Longitudinal Surveys, Americans’ Changing Lives, and Aging, Status, Sense of Control). Other rich datasets are available from NACDA and ICPSR, two major electronic data archives.

Publications

Montez, Jennifer Karas, Mark D. Hayward, Dustin C. Brown, and Robert A. Hummer.  2009.  “Why is the Educational Gradient of Mortality Steeper for Men?”  Journal of Gerontology:  Social Sciences 64B(5):625:634.

download

Crimmins, Eileen M., Mark D. Hayward, Yasuhiko Saito, Aaron Hagedorn, and Nicolaus Brouard.  “Change in Disability-Free Life Expectancy for Americans 70 Years Old and Older.” 2009.  Demography 46(3):627-646.

download

Whitfield, Keith E., Xiaopan Yao, K. Boomer, George P. Vogler, Mark D. Hayward, and David J. Vandenbergh. 2009. Analysis of Candidate Genes and Hypertension in African American Adults. Ethnicity and Disease 19:18-22.

download

Merkin, Sharon Stein, Arun Karlamangla, Eileen Crimmins, Susan L. Charette, Mark Hayward, Jung Ki Kim, Brandon Koretz, and Teresa Seeman. 2009. Education Differentials by Race and Ethnicity in the Diagnosis and Management of Hypercholesterolemia: A National Sample of U.S. Adults (NHANES 1999-2002). International Journal of Public Health 54:166-74.

download

Zhang, Zhenmei. Danan Gu, and Mark D. Hayward. 2008. Early Life Influences on Cognitive Impairment Among Chinese Oldest-Old. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences 63B: S25-S33.

download

Crimmins, Eileen M., Mark D. Hayward, Hiroshi Ueda, Yasuhiko Saito, and Jung Ki Kim. 2008. Life With and Without Heart Disease Among Women and Men Over 50. Journal of Women and Aging 20:5-19.

download

Moolchan, Eric T., Pebbles Fagan, Anita F. Fernander, Wayne F. Velicer, Mark D. Hayward, Gary King, and Richard R. Clayton. 2007. Addressing Tobacco-Related Health Disparities. Addiction 102:30-42.

download

Hidajat, Mira, Mark D. Hayward, and Yasuhiko Saito. 2007. Indonesia's Social Capacity for Population Health: The Education Gap in Active Life Expectancy. Population Research and Policy Review 26:219-234.

download

Warner, David, and Mark D. Hayward. 2006. Early Life Origins of the Race Gap in Men’s Mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 47:209-226.

download

Zhang, Zhenmei and Mark D. Hayward. 2006. Gender, the Marital Life Course, and Cardiovascular Health in Late Midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family 68:639-657.

download

Best, Latrica, Mark D. Hayward, and Mira Hidajat. 2005. Life Course Pathways to Adult-Onset Diabetes. Social Biology 52:94-111.

download

Crimmins, Eileen M., Mark D. Hayward, and Teresa Seeman. 2004. Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status and Health. Pp. 310-352 In Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Later Life, edited by N. B. Anderson, R. A. Bulatao, and B. Cohen. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

download

Hayward, Mark D., and Bridget K. Gorman. 2004. The Long Arm of Childhood: The Influence of Early-Life Social Conditions on Men’s Mortality. Demography 41:87-107.

download

bottom border