Roger & Ann Worthington Essay Prize in Plan II Honors
Worthington Annual Writing Contest
A yearly competition, the Worthington Essay competition poses a difficult moral problem which entrants must answer in a short essay. A generous gift in 2002 from Plan II alumnus Roger Worthington made the Worthington Essay Prize possible.
Only Plan II students may apply. Essays should be 1500 - 2000 words in length and offer a clear, well-reasoned answer to the question posed. Awards are not made for essays that argue both sides. Faculty will evaluate and judge the essays.
The first-year prize will go to the best essay by a Plan II student entering in the Fall, unless that student should win the grand prize.
Grand Prize, $5000
First-Year Prize $3000 (for an incoming student not winning the grand prize)
Second Prize, $2000
Deadline: 5 p.m., Friday October 17, 2014
- The essay should be long enough to make a convincing argument, yet be clear and concise.
- Include a title page with your name, UT EID, email address, and your class (freshman, sophomore, etc.).
- Submit your essay to the Plan II Honors front desk. NO LATE ENTRIES.
- Students who receive financial aid should check with the UT Office of Student Financial Services to find out if winning a prize will affect their aid package.
You are the youngest member of the editorial board of Weird Austin, an online magazine that has developed a large national readership. Content in the magazine includes local and national news, fiction, personal essays, political cartoons, and regular columns on subjects ranging from home improvement to healthy eating to relationship advice.
The magazine is also known for its unabashed writing on domestic violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, animal cruelty and substance abuse, among other sensitive subjects. Recently, readers petitioned the magazine to include “trigger warnings” that precede each article, to caution readers that they are about to encounter material that could be traumatizing. At a recent board meeting, opinions were mixed.
“Isn’t a headline sufficient warning?” asked Don Smith, one of your colleagues. “I mean, if the headline of the story is “Suspected Rapist Arrested,” readers can decide for themselves whether that’s something they want to read, right?”
“Not always,” said Camille Pallier. “We just published a 6000-word memoir essay entitled “Why I Live Alone” that covered all kinds of upsetting subject matter—you’d never communicate all of that in a headline.”
“So what are you going to do? Have a sidebar next to each article, with a bulleted list of everything that might upset anybody?” Don asked, incredulously.
“Why not?” Camille responded.
“What if the article mentions smoking, and we didn’t put a trigger warning on it, and somebody is upset because their mom died of lung cancer? How do we decide which topics deserve trigger warnings and which topics don’t?” Don said.
As usual, the magazine’s webmaster, Erin, offered a technical workaround. “We can create an option for readers to set up user accounts where they select their preferences for what kind of content they don’t want to see—if they check the boxes for sexual assault, violence, or whatever, they won’t see any articles about those things. We could let them customize it however they want. Those stories will just vanish from their view, as long as they’re signed into their account.”
“That seems even worse to me,” Don said. “I think some people might see a trigger warning and then decide to read the story despite the potential discomfort. But if they never even see the story, you’re taking that option away from them.”
The executive editor, Vijay Murthy, noticed that you hadn’t said anything. “What do you think?”
“I’d like to think about this for a while, Mr. Murthy,” you said.
What are the risks and benefits of trigger warnings (to the reader, to the publication, and to society)? What editorial policy do you think the magazine should adopt?
Write your recommendation to Mr. Murthy in a memo of 1500-2000 words.