CC 303/352: Classical Mythology

Final Exam: Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 9-12, GEO 100

Practice Exam

 

A. Answer four (4) of the following questions in very brief essays (10 points each).

I. Thebes is said to have two separate foundation myths. Identify who each of these two founders or sets of founders is, and describe very briefly what each of them did to "found" the city.
Grading:
Identification of founders: 2 points each
Description of foundation myths: 4 points each

II. Explain how the concept of "shame culture" might help us to understand the reaction of Achilles to the loss of Briseis.
Grading:
Identification of what a shame culture is: 5 points
Explanation of Achilles' actions: 5 points

III. Identify two examples of excess retribution in the myths of Mycenae and evaluate very briefly the significance of this excess.
Grading:
Identification of excess: 4 points for each event.
Evaluation of significance: 2 points

IV. Identify two things Odysseus learns on his return from Troy and explain very briefly how he learns them.
Grading:
What Odysseus learns: 3 points each
How he learns: 2 points each

V. Describe very briefly how two Roman myths reflect Roman ideology.
Grading:
The myths: 2 points each
The ideology: 3 points each

B. Discuss the role of hubris in Greek and Roman mythology. Do the following:
1. Explain what
hubris is.
2. Identify occurrences of
hubris in 3 separate myths, one from each of the following sets of myths:
a. The creation myths and myths with gods at their center.
b. The myths surrounding heroes we studied mid-semester (Perseus, Heracles, Theseus, Jason).
c. The myths we studied in the last part of the semester (Thebes, Troy, Mycenae, Odysseus, Rome).
3. Explain the significance of
hubris in Greek thought.
Grading: 30 points total, broken down as follows:
Explanation of
hubris: 4 points
Application of the concept of
hubris to each of the three myths: 7 points each
Explanation of the significance of
hubris: 5 points

C. We have observed that a central element of Greek thought was the opposition between the oikos (the household) and the polis (the state). Explain the role of this opposition in one play of Euripides (Hippolytus or Medea), one play by Sophocles (Oedipus at Colonus or Antigone), and in Aeschylus' Oresteia, then draw a general conclusion about the role of this opposition in the tragedies. Consider for each play how the most important characters react to this opposition, and what results from their reactions to the opposition. (30 points)
Grading:
Explanation of the role of the opposition in each of the 3 tragedies or trilogies: 8 points each
General conclusion on the role of the opposition in the tragedies: 6 points

back to test guidelines

back to CC 303/352 homepage


last modified November 27th, 2001 by timmoore@utxvms.cc.utexas.edu