II. Human Nature and the "Culture Wars"
Course web site:
American society is divided fundamentally along issues of value and meaning as never before.
James Davison Hunter, Culture Wars (Basic Books, 1991)
Divisions along denominational lines (incl. Prot./Cath./Jew) are fading. Intra-religious conflict, between traditionalists and non-traditionalists, growing.
By contrast, the differences between North and South in Civil War seem trivial.
Controversies about:
My aim: help to transform the culture wars into the culture conversation.
Reason and civility.
Too often -- the University (i.e., higher education in the U. S.) has acted solely as a partisan in the culture wars, taking up the non-traditional side, treating the other side as benighted and ignorant.
I want a genuine conversation -- both sides are fairly represented.
What are our aims, and how are we going to achieve them?
The central value of the course: truth seeking.
Eschew nihilism (there's no such thing), emotivisim (belieiving what make you feel good), populism (avoiding "weird" beliefs).
Main constraints on how we pursue truth: rationality, mutual respect and civility.
An unprecedented social and cultural decline: crime, family breakdown, teen suicide, educational failure.
Mystery: why such decline, in face of scientific advancement, economic progress?
Key: understanding human nature.
How do we grow in our understanding of human nature? Raises fundamental question about what sort of thing a human being is.
Two answers:
What is a worldview?
A worldview is a set of life-shaping beliefs and attitudes about who we are and what is our place in the cosmos.
Every normal adult has a worldview.
Worldviews vs. philosophies.
A worldview becomes a philosophy after it has been refined through extensive discussion, examination, criticism.
Philosophy is a conversation between worldviews, carried out over many generations, with continuing reference to written records of earlier stages of the conversation.
Philosophy is a basic human need.
Sooner or later, you will do philosophy. The only question is: will you do it well or badly?
The formal study of philosophy brings you up to date in the Great Conversation, provides you with information about what the greatest minds of the past have had to say (in response to one another) on the great, perennial questions.
Is philosophy practical?
Philosophy is not everything, but it is a very significant something.
Traditional vs. Non-traditional Worldviews
| Traditional | Non-traditional |
|---|---|
| Built-in purposes | No built-in purposes |
| Absolute values | Values relative, changing |
| Virtue its own reward | Virtue depends on social rewards |
| Related to a spiritual world | Part of the material world |
| Sacred texts, moral imagination | Scientific, technical knowledge suffices |
| Self-discipline | Freedom |
| Character | Information |
| Truth | Tolerance |
Student of Socrates. Athens, 5th c. B.C.
Aristocratic family.
Parallel to modern times:
Socrates was a real person, Plato's mentor.
In the Dialogues, Socrates is a character, through whom Plato expresses his own views.
The dialogue represents a kind of ideal discussion: typically, truth triumphs in the end.
The Socratic method:
"My method is to call in support of my statements the evidence of a single witness, the man I am arguing with."
Asking questions, and guiding the reasoning of the participant, step by step.
The issue: which is worse, to suffer wrong or to do wrong?
Socrates claims: it is worse to do wrong, and still worse than that to do wrong and escape punishment.
The person most to be pitied (not envied!) is the person who does wrong and gets away with it.
Distinction: doing what one pleases, and doing what one wills.
If I go to a quack to be healed, then I am doing what I please (going to the quack), but not what I will (being healed).
The dictator/demagogue does as he pleases (killing and coercing at will), but not as he wills (thriving as a human being).
Just: what is right and proper
Fine: what is noble, beautiful, admirable
Useful: what is beneficial
The soul = the immaterial, intellectual/emotive aspect of the human being.
Phl 303 Home Page | Phl 303 Lecture Outlines | Philosophy Department | Prof. Koons | UT Austin Web Central