Phl 303
Lecture 24: Summing Up


I. Do we need objective values?
II. Do we need a rational/natural scale of values?
III. Is human nature anti-social?
IV. What are the real values?
V. Implications for education and government

I. Do we need objective values?

In everyday life:

In the absence of objective values, we have no basis for our decisions.
No reason to be deliberate, well-informed or intelligent.
We're at the mercy of the latest fads, propaganda.

In education:

If there are no objective values, then we have to choose between manipulation and value-free learning.

Value-free learning is impossible, since to delete any discussion of moral or intellectual values is, implicitly, to discount them.

Hedonism/economic pragmatism become the de facto moral code.

Manipulation means that education is at the mercy of the best-organized political interest groups.
Political might makes right.

In government:

Without an objective scale of values, we cannot find a basis for preferring justice or personal liberty over oppression & slavery.

Also, we cannot adjudicate between competing rights-claims:

II. Do we need rational/natural values?

If true values can only be known through special revelation, available only to some, then society cannot be a partnership of equals.

Moreover, we would have to pretend to be able to distinguish those who are saved/enlightened from those who are not.
Externalization of faith -- leads to a distortion of religion, institutionalizing hypocrisy.

Natural, rational values -- are knowable by all humans, through the exercise of normal capacities.

We don't have to assume the non-existence of supernatural values. The pursuit of such values can be left to special partnerships (church, synagogue, family).

III. Is human nature anti-social?

Rousseau, Mill, Freud -- all agree that we are by nature amoral, self-centered.

(For Rousseau, this is tempered by a natural sense of sympathy/pity.)

Predominant evidence from anthropology & biology suggestst that Aristotle is right: that we are social/political animals.

This is a crucial issue--
1. If we are by nature anti-social, then morality (the superego) benefits society at the expense of the individual's self-interest.
2. If we are by nature social, then justice, civic-mindedness, familial bonds, friendship, etc. are all essential components of self-interest. No conflict between morality and self-interest. (Recall the Gorgias)

IV. What are the natural values?

We can discover natural values through two means:
1. Consulting the advice of the wisest observers of the human condition, as represented in religious texts, stories & literature, proverbs & moral philosophy.
2. We can study the adaptations that make up human nature through history, anthrolopogy, evolutionary psychology.

Some Natural Values:

  1. Life and health, fitness, wholeness of body.
  2. The nuclear family: permanent monogamy, children, mutual affection and care.
  3. The extended family: community, nation. Patriotism, ethnic pride.
  4. Civic participation, justice, cooperating in the rule of law.
  5. Friendship. Reciprocity, gratitude, loyalty.
  6. Work, success, prestige & recognition, accumulation of property.
  7. Intellectual activity -- learning about science & philosophy, reflection & thought.
  8. Recreation -- sports, games, hobbies.
Key -- balance, proportion.

Eschewing false values, pleasures:

V. Implications for Education and Government

For Education:

Education must aim, not just at providing technical skills and information, but at forming character.

Should permeate the curriculum -- especially in the choice of literature.

For Government:

Adults should be given a sphere of freedom, within which to exercise and develop their virtues.

Framework of law and property, of fixed rights and responsibilities.

Law should favor and encourage wise and virtuous action.


Last updated December 7, 1998
Created by: Robert C. Koons
Send comments to: koons@la.utexas.edu

Phl 303 Home Page | Phl 303 Lecture Outlines | Philosophy Department | Prof. Koons | UT Austin Web Central