I. The Existence of Happiness: Question 1
II. What Happiness is Not: Question 2
III. The Nature of Happiness: Question 3
IV. Introduction to Joseph Butler
Question 1:
1. Human action has an end (purpose).
An action is human not just because it is performed by a a human being: it must involve the exercise of peculiarly human powers.
These peculiarly human powers are the reason and the will.
The object of the will is called an "end".
Hence, all properly human actions are performed for an end.
Suppose that a human action ocurred for an end (by article 1), but not for any ultimate end.
This would mean that every end for which the action is performed is itself merely the means for some further end.
This would mean that the human action was performed for the sake of an infinite regress of reasons.
An infinite regress of reasons cannot move the will to action (basic metaphysical principle).
Hence, every human action is performed for some ultimate end.
3 arguments are given (in Response, pp. 10-11):
The ultimate end of any action is that thing which would satisfy every desire.
Hence, there is but one ultimate end of human action (i.e., the complete fulfillment of human nature).
The fundamental principle of every kind of thing is tends toward a single thing (since, otherwise, the individual members of this kind would not be unified as substances)>
Hence, the human will tends toward a single thing.
The human will tends toward the ultimate ends of human action.
Hence, human action has only one ultimate end.
Therefore, things belong to the genus human action by virtue of their sharing a common end or purpose.
Therefore, all human actions have the same ultimate end.
This follows from the 3 arguments for article 4: all human actions share the same ultimate end: the complete fulfillment of human nature.
Aquinas answers the obvious objection: people seems to strive for a variety of ultimate ends: money, power, pleasure, honor, virtue, knowledge, etc.
Aquinas distinguishes between the notion of happiness (the common concept, shared by all) and our ideas of what this happiness consists in.
We share a common ultimate end --- but we differ in our opinions of how to reach it.
2 reasons:
Distinction: bodily delight (pleasure) and intellectual delight.
Even delight is not the same thing as happiness: it is rather the result or symptom of happiness.
Moreover, bodily delight is even more clearly not happiness, since humans have a rational soul, whose existence does not depend on the body.
In addition, this rational soul is of greater value than the body, since it is capable of knowing an infinity of things (through knowing universals), while the body is finite in its capacities.
For these 2 reasons, Aquinas concludes that the body exists for the sake of the soul, not the soul for the body.
The superiority of the useless over the useful: friendship, philosophy, art, sport, as opposed to money-making or other necessary activities.
Very topical debate: contrast:
The ultimate end must bring human desire to rest.
Human desire (in its rational aspect, i.e., the will) cannot be brought to rest by anything finite or limited.
Any created good is finite and limited.
Hence, happiness does not consist in any created good.
In a nutshell: perfect happiness consists in the perfect speculative knowledge of God's essence (the "beatific vision").
Imperfect (earthly) happiness consists in the full range of activities that Aristotle would have described as "eudaemonia".
If we know something, but do not know fully know its cause, then we desire to do so.
Hence, our natural desire of curiosity can be fully satisfied only by fully knowing the ultimate cause of everything, which is God.
Sermons, published in 1726.
Had profound effect on moral philosophy in Britain, well into 20th century.
2 major themes:
Distinction between power and authority.
Following nature is not a matter of following our strongest inclinations, but our highest (the inclinations with the greatest authority).
Phl 303 Home Page | Phl 303 Lecture Outlines | Philosophy Department | Prof. Koons | UT Austin Web Central
I. The Existence of Happiness
Human action has a single, ultimate end that is shared by all people. This end we call "happiness".Key Articles:
3.Human action has an ultimate end.
4. Human action has a single ultimate end.
7. This end is shared by all people.Article 1: Human action has an end.
Article 3: All human action has an ultimate end.
Article 4: all human action is performed for a single ultimate end.
Article 7: this ultimate end is shared by all human beings.
II. What Happiness is Not: Question 2
Happiness is not Power (4th article)
Happiness is not Pleasure (6th article)
Happiness does not Consist in any created good. (article 8)
III. What Happiness Consists in (Question 3)
We have a natural desire to know things (the sense of wonder, curiosity).IV. Introduction to Joseph Butler
Human Nature comprises a constitutional system of drives, desires, instincts.
Last updated September 13, 1998
Created by: Robert C. Koons
Send comments to: koons@la.utexas.edu