Classical Conditioning
Paradigm
Developed theory during research on dog
salivation
Components
of Classical Conditioning
Conditioned
response (CR)
NS→
(dies not elicit UCR)
UCS→
UCR
(exposure to UCS elicits UCR)
CS→CR
Orignially, the subject does not perceive any
relationship between the NS and the UCS.
After the NS is paired with the UCS, it becomes a
CS, and elicits a CR.
Increasing a classically conditioned response
Increase the number of pairings
Each time the NS is paired
to the UCS, the connection strengthens, making the CS more salient
Increase strength of UCS
Increasing the salience of
the UCS makes it more likely that an NS will be paired with it, and become a
CS.
Contiguity
Implementing the NS and the UCS close together in time
increases the strength of the pairing
Decreasing
a classically conditioned response
Extinction
If the UCS does not
occur after the CS, over time the CR
will diminish and stop, so that the NS is no longer paired with the UCS.
Counter-conditioning
A new, more desirable conditioned response replaces
the original CR. This occurs when the new
CS is more salient than the old CS.
Also, the new response should be incompatible with the old one.
Exhaustion
Occurs through overexposure to the CS. Constant exposure to the CS causes the
subject to habituate to it.
Stimulus
Control
Generalization
Any stimulus that is similar to the CS
produces the CR
Discrimination
The CR is produced only by the CS
Higher-order
Conditioning
A new NS is paired with the CS (not the UCS), and elicits the
CR. The new NS therefore becomes a CS.
Applying Classical Conditioning
Classical conditioning can be applied to real world
settings in a variety of ways. For
example:
Education settings
Test or math anxiety
Positive associations
Nutritional settings
Food aversions, addictions
Language settings
Anxiety over speaking