Overview:
James Deetz’s research
has been primarily focused on historical archaeology, which deals with
cultures that were literate as opposed to those of prehistory, and its
relationship with culture change. As Deetz has stated, he is
like Kent Flannery’s Old Timer, “who believed
in culture as the central paradigm in archaeology” (Flannery 1982:265-278).
What questions have driven
his research?
The
questions addressed by Deetz in his research are as follows: How
are cultural changes expressed in the archaeological
record? What can be derived from the archaeological
record that was left out of the written record? “How relationships
perceived in the designs and forms of different
sets of artifacts relate to organizing principals which tie
a whole society together, and how over time these shift” (James
Deetz web page).
Book Reviews:
James Deetz’s earliest works
were addressed specific sites or archaeological topics. Among these
were Archaeological Investigations at La Purisima Mission (1963),
A Brief History of the Discovery of Neanderthal Man (1958), and
The Dynamics of Stylisitic Change in Arikara Ceramics (1965).
In The Dynamics of Stylisitic Change in Arikara Ceramics, Deetz
carefully presents his study of 2,500 rim sherds found on the Medicine
Crow cite in South Dakota to establish artifacts
relation to culture. He stresses the idea that artifacts are the
physical remains of, and key insights into, the cultures of past peoples.
Namely, Deetz attempts to determine if the change
in social organization seen at the time was
related to changes seen in ceramic design present in the archaeological
record. He incorporates a variety of scientific
techniques to investigate three possibilities throughout the
work. Either there is no relation between change in social organization
and change in ceramic design, the changes
were indirectly related in that some third event caused both changes,
or that the changes are directly related to each other. He concludes
in quite convincing fashion that it is “most
logical and efficient” in light of the evidence that the changes
in social organization were reflected in the changes of ceramic design
(Deetz, 1965:96).
In 1967 Deetz wrote
Invitation to Archaeology, his first introduction to the subject
of archaeology. In it he covers all of the
basic ideas and methods of archaeology including dating methods, seriation,
and assemblages. Deetz attempts to show the reader why a
person would want to become an archaeologist, and how an archaeologist
thinks. In 1977 James Deetz published
his most well known work entitled In
Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life.
This book gained wide recognition and is now
required in many archaeology
courses throughout the country. In it, Deetz presented
many of the ideas he had written about in earlier books in a concise, readable
form. The book centers around the importance
of material culture which he defines as, “that
sector of our physical environment that we modify through culturally determined
behavior,” that, “includes everything from the common
pin to interplanetary space vehicle” (Deetz,
1977:24). Deetz’s writing about historical archaeology urges researchers
to place less importance on the writing of
the time, and more on the artifacts left behind. He states
that the common thread of writing of early Americans
tends to make us form a false understanding
of their culture, in which they are simple, quaint people. Deetz
stresses the point that material culture can
show us evidence of culture that is omitted or twisted in literature
and that writing is almost always biased, while “material culture may be
the most objective source of information we
have concerning America's past” (Deetz, 1975:160). This book forces
the reader to think of every action taken throughout the day to be a culturally
driven process which could end up as an artifact. Deetz sums up his
work in In Small Things Forgotten quite simply by saying, “don't
read what we have written; look at what we have done” (Deetz, 1975:161).
James Deetz's most resent
work is Flowerdew Hundred: The Archaeology of a Virginia
Plantation,
1619 - 1864, for which he won the 1994
S.A.S. Mooney Book Award. This book focusses on the historical
archaeological record of the Flowerdew
Hundred Plantation in Virginia.
Brief Biography:
James Deetz received his Ph.D.
from Harvard University in 1960. Since that time he has held the
positions of Professor of Anthropology at the University of California
at Santa Barbara, Brown University, and the University of Virginia.
He is married and has nine children. I don't know their names.
He has also been the Archaeological Adviser to Plymouth Plantation in Plymouth,
Massachusetts, starting in 1961.
Where has he conducted research?
Deetz
has conducted research at many sites throughout the world. His main
interests though, lie in the Virginian Tidewater, New England, and the
Eastern Cape of South Africa.
Changing Views/Methods
Throughout his career, James
Deetz's main focus always remained on the emphasis of material culture
in historical archaeology. While his views remained constant, his
approach to spreading them changed with time. After graduating from
Harvard Deetz illustrated his ideas in a series of books with specific
topics, such as The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics,
which were not very popular. Then, in 1967 Deetz began to write books
like Invitation to Archaeology, which were written with an audience
of the general public in mind, and his ideas then became much more well
known and accepted.
Bibliography