A modern approach to the problems of archaeological interpretrations, which had the
following characteristics - 1)archaeology was now to explain past change, not simply to
describe it, 2)archaeology would now think in terms of culture process in explaining
archaelogical finds, 3)New archaeology involves the formulation of hypotheses and models
and uses more deductive reasoning, 4) hypotheses were to be tested and only accepted on
the basis of the evidence, not the standing of the archaeologist, 5) research should be
designed to answer specific questions economically, 6)archaeology was now to incorporate
quantitative data using sampling and significance testing, and 7)archaeology would now be
more positive and try to solve all problems.
New archaelogy began in about the mid-1960s in the United States.
An example of the influence of new archaeology is in the Great Zimbabwe site of monuments,
which has historicaly been ascribed to other cultures by traditional archaelogists. New
archaelogy has backed up claims of those who say that those in Zimbabwe built the site
themselves in ancient times with no foreign builder. This is in the Archaeology
textbook.
Composed by Patrick Findlay, Sara Jones, Sally McIver, Joseph Billeaud, and Ted Weiman.
Last updated 25 February 1997