
Introduction to Archaeology
Anthro 304 / ARY 301 Spring 1997
Prof. Samuel M. Wilson
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas
Lecture 6: American Archaeology in the 20th Century
- Early 20th Century issues of Classification and chronology
Filling in the Geochronological grid...
| Egypt | Levant | Mesopotamia | Indus | India | SE Asia | China |
| 1000 B.C. | | | | | | |
|
| 2000 B.C. | | | | | | |
|
| 3000 B.C. | | | | | | |
|
| 4000 B.C. | | | | | | |
|
- Early 20th Century American Archaeology and Ethnology
- relationships with Native Peoples
- interest in material culture and "assemblages"
- museum collections grouped into "culture areas"
- Franz Boas and early American Anthropology; particularism and the focus on individual groups and histories
- Archaeology and its social context: WWII
- the impact of technology for ancient people
- the importance of a scientific approach
- Multi-disciplinary studies
- lifeways and domestication: Jarmo, Robert Braidwood, et al.
- other foci - Virú valley, Gordon Willey and settlement patterns
- MacNeish, Tehuacán valley
- focus on trade, settlement, economy, domestication, sedentism
- The New Archaeology of the 1960s and 1970s
- the social context of the academe in this period
- an emphasis on why things happened, not just that they happened
- Key issues --
- why did food production begin
- why did complex societies emerge in some places and not others
- A few characteristics of the New Archaeology
- Scientific paradigm: forms of logic desgined to formulate law-like generalities
- Substantial borrowing from other disciplines
- "Systems Theory" borrowed from information sciences -- societies in the environment worked together like intricate machines
- The scientific paradigm reflected how technically sophisticated archaeology had become, for example now depending heavily on radiocarbon dating and other kinds of archaeometry.
- More multidisciplinary efforts
- More emphasis on quantitative methods
- "Problem Orientation"
SMW 1/97