The University of Texas at Austin

Health & Wellness - CNN World  RSS

  • Headliners: To Run or Not to Run

    Headliners: To Run or Not to Run

    Published: Sept. 16, 2013

    UT Austin scholars made headlines recently, discussing physiology, global politics and the Bard. Find out whether biking or running is more effective for weight loss, per Professor Tanaka.

    Read this story

    • Quote 2
      Mart Davids said on Oct. 4, 2013 at 12:55 a.m.
      Interesting article on running vs biking. Here's my own take: Biking: * Burns fewer calories per hour than running (a 150-pound person cycling at 16 to 19 miles per hour burns about 850 calories). * A gentler workout than running, at least for your joints and the weight-bearing parts of your body. * Vigorous cycling may lower levels of ghrelin, the hormone that stimulates your appetite (meaning you won't be as hungry). Running: * Generally burns more calories per minute than cycling (a 150-pound person running a 7-minute mile—which is really, really fast—burns about 1,000 calories per hour). * Has been shown to be the source of more injuries than cycling. * Vigorous running may also quell your appetite. Still, what you enjoy the most is often the overlooked factor!
    • Quote 2
      Liora D. said on Sept. 16, 2013 at 12:18 p.m.
      As of 9/16, 5 out of 5 stories on this page refer to men. Where are the references to female researchers, scholars, and experts? will you make efforts to include them, as well?