Note:
Brandon C. Janes, Antitrust—Jury is not Permitted to Know of
the Treble Damage or Attorney’s Fee Features of Claton Act
Section 4 Judgments: Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing
Co., 498 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir. 1974), 53 Texas L. Rev. 848 (1975).
Abstract:
Pollock & Riley, Inc., a beer distributor, filed suit against
its supplier, Pearl Brewing Co., alleging that Pearl violated
various provisions of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. Prior to
voir dire, plaintiff moved that the court, through defendant’s
counsel, instruct defendant and defendant’s witnesses to refrain
from mentioning, in the jury’s presence, that plaintiff’s actual
damages would be trebled and that plaintiff would also recover a
reasonable attorney’s fee if successful in the suit. The
district court sustained the motion in limine and Pearl brought
an interlocutory appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Affirmed. In a
treble damage action brought under section 4 of the Clayton Act,
the jury should not be advised that actual damages will be
trebled and the successful plaintiff will recover a reasonable
attorney’s fee.