Back Issues & Abstracts

Article: 

Helen Garfield, The Transitory Divorce Action: Jurisdiction in the No-Fault Era, 58 TEXAS L. REV. 501 (1980). 

Jurisdiction over divorce suits has traditionally been based on domicile, and this remains so today.  This article argues that the domicile requirement is outdated.  It holds on because of fear that a divorce entered on some other jurisdictional basis will not be entitled to full faith and credit in other states.  Adhering to rigid domicile-based jurisdiction requirements was a necessary part of the fault concept of divorce.  Under this regime, the existence of many states with very restrictive divorce laws encouraged migratory divorces, and the domicile requirement was a good weapon against this.  But now that fault is no longer the sole ground for divorce, the need for escape to generous jurisdictions is gone.  New divorce law focuses more on the interests of the individual than did the old law, which focused on the interests of the state.  This new attitude should militate in favor of giving people greater flexibility.  What we have now are migratory people, not migratory divorces, and no real interest is protected by preventing these people from obtaining divorces in their new home states, in which they usually do not meet the technical requirements of domicile.