Book Review:
Edith H. Jones, Back to the Future for Federal Appeals
Courts: Rationing Federal Justice by Recovering Limited
Jurisdiction (reviewing Thomas E. Baker’s Rationing Justice on
Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals) (1994)),
73 TEXAS L. REV. 1485 ((1995).
Abstract:
In Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts
of Appeals, Professor Baker demonstrates that the explosion in
the federal appellate caseload has overburdened the courts and
that reform of the system is needed. While numerous cures have
been suggested, from increasing the number of judges to creating
specialized courts, none have made the case that they can fix
the system. The one repair that might aid the courts, limiting
subject matter jurisdiction, is itself impossible, ruled out by
the lack of a political will to implement it. Judge Jones notes
that the book’s “encyclopedic scope, succinctness, and
readability have my utmost admiration.” The work delivers a good
history of the expansion of federal jurisdiction, discusses the
judicial actions that have been taken to make the expanding
caseload manageable, considers potential legislative reforms,
and provides a survey of the effects of the crisis. Throughout,
it treats virtually every argument on the subject in detail.