|
Volume 3 - Spring 2002
Who Can a "Baller" Trust?
Analyzing Public University Response to Alleged
Student-Athlete Misconduct in a Commercial and
Confusing Environment
Jim Moye & C. Kieth
Harrison, Ed.D.
Moye and Harrison examine whether state colleges and
universities offend the due process rights of
student-athletes when, following allegations of
misconduct, the student-athletes are automatically
suspended from participating in their sport. The
authors first consult case law to determine what
rights a student has when the school takes action
related to his or her alleged misconduct. They then
review some of the more controversial incidents
involving student-athletes that have made the front
pages of American newspapers. Drawing from the above
analysis, Moye and Harrison discuss whether
automatic suspensions of student-athletes are
constitutional. The article ends with
recommendations for state schools in handling
alleged misconduct of student-athletes. Moye and
Harrison conclude that following allegations of
misconduct, state universities must provide the
requisite notice and hearing before suspending
student-athletes; to automatically suspend the
student-athletes would offend the student’s due
process rights.
Trade Dress as the Only
Club in the Bag to Protect Golf Club Manufacturers
from 'Knock-Offs' of Their Prized Boutique Golf
Clubs
Tina Y.
Burleson & Walter T. Champion, Jr.
Tascano v. PGA Tour: Par
for the Course of an Antitrust Mulligan?
Ryan M. Rodenberg
Book Review: Waivers &
Releases for the Health & Fitness Club Industry
Thomas D. Lohrentz
|
