About Subscribe Submit Members Links Contact
Current Issue

Fall 2007 - Vol. 9

Abstracts

Spring 2007 - Vol. 8
Fall 2006 - Vol.7
Spring 2005 - Vol. 6
Spring 2004 - Vol. 5 No. 2
Fall 2003 - Vol. 5 No. 1
Spring 2003 - Vol. 4
Spring 2002 - Vol. 3
Spring 2001 - Vol. 2
Spring 2000 - Vol. 1

Need A Reprint?

Volume 5 Number 1 - Fall 2003

How the Home Team Can Keep From Getting Sacked: A City's Best Defense to Franchise Free Agency in Professional Football

In recent years, several NFL teams, including the Los Angeles Rams and Houston Oilers, have moved to cities offering huge financial incentives in the form of stadium revenue packages. In this article, Bradley Stein explores this issue of team relocation and offers ideas on how cities can prevent their NFL franchises from leaving.

As the NFL has seen its popularity soar in the past few years, cities without NFL franchises have convinced teams to move by building publicly financed stadiums. Additionally, since most revenue is shared equally among the NFL teams, cities offer owners of unshared revenue, which is raised from concessions, advertising and luxury boxes, allowing teams to move from larger markets (L.A. and Houston) to smaller markets (Oakland and Nashville).

Stein also notes that the Raiders original move from Oakland to Los Angeles helped pave the way for the franchise free agency the NFL faces right now. In that move, the NFL owners voted against allowing the Raiders to move, but the Raiders won an anti-trust lawsuit permitting the relocation. In the aftermath of this legislation, the NFL and the owners have shown little interest in preventing teams from moving. Additionally, cities find it difficult to protect themselves contractually since the teams have all of the bargaining power.

Without the help of the league or owners, cities will need to rely on local and state levels to protect themselves. Stein explains how Cleveland was able to retain its team’s name and traditions through local rallies and support from Congressional representatives. Stein also explains how an eminent domain claim might be the best method a city can use to keep the owner from relocating a team, especially in light of how the Supreme Court is currently interpreting the Commerce Clause.

Attorneys As Athlete-Agents: Reconciling the ABA Rules of Professional Conduct with the Practice of Athlete Representation

Comment: A (Not So) Safe Harbor: Substantial Proportionality as a Measure of Effective Accomodation

Note: The Cincinnati Bengals' Legal Obligation to Win: A Case Study for the Public Funding of Stadiums and a Roadmap for Municipal Investment

Note: Life After Napster: Will Its Successors Share Its Fate?

Home | About | Subscribe | Submit | Members | Links | Contact
 
©2007 Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law