THE
RECORD
OCTOBER
14,1975
VOL.1,
No.11
LYNDON
B. JOHNSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
EDITOR
Hoyt H. Purvis
SYMPOSIUM
PARTICIPANTS DISCUSS STATE OF ARTS
"...Somehow,
the scientists always seem to get the penthouse while the arts and humanities
get the basement."
—President
Lyndon B. Johnson September 29, 1965
Ten
years after President Johnson signed legislation which established the National
Foundation for the Arts, some of the nation's leading artists and supporters of
the arts gathered at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library to reassess the state of
the arts.
At
the two-day symposium on The Arts: Years of Development, Time of Decision on September 29-30,
most of the participants seemed to agree that during the past 10 years the arts
have climbed out of the basement. (It should also be noted that many observers
feel like scientists no longer get the penthouse. A prominent spokesman decried
the level of federal support for scientific research in a talk here only a few
days after the arts symposium.) (See Dr. Price Discusses. . . page 4.)
Beverly
Sills, the internationally acclaimed soprano, set the tone for the gathering in
her keynote address. She said, "The arts are flourishing in this country.
There is no crisis in the arts. There is a money crisis."
"Why
are we so loathe to change our priorities?" Sills asked. "Why are
wars never underfinanced?"
Stating
that the defense budget is in the range of $103 billion, she suggested that
"we can afford at least $1 billion for the arts."
"We
are powerful enough as a nation. We already have sufficient means for
destruction of our civilization," Sills said.
"It
would seem the creative need of people is at last greater than the destructive
need," said Sills, who came to Austin following a performance with the
Dallas Symphony.
Mrs.
Lyndon B. Johnson, in concluding the symposium, said "...The greatest
satisfaction for me, as I know it would have been for him [President Johnson],
is to see that the legislation signed 10 years ago represented—as he
believed—a note deep in the hearts of all the people...and that the goals
we set then have been broadened and strengthened through the Nixon and Ford
Administrations...It seems to me that we have been seeing a continuing success
story that cuts across politics, and—happily—is cutting across
geographical boundaries."
Mrs.
Johnson said she felt like the country has "been in the midst of a
cultural revolution and that the Endowment is working as a sort of yeast in the
whole."
Mrs.
Johnson referred to having been "totally immersed" during the
symposium and it was, indeed a period of total immersion for the large number
of persons attending the event.
In
between the keynote address by Beverly Sills and Mrs. Johnson's concluding
remarks, the participants heard a speech by Hubert Humphrey and three panel
discussions. Additionally, the panelists answered numerous questions from the
audience.
The
program was loaded with prominent figures. In fact, there were so many notable
participants in the discussions that it was sometimes difficult for in-depth
discussion. Representatives of the major performing and visual arts took part,
although there were, for example, no representatives of folk art and culture.
The
panel discussion on Art and Politics had to be shifted to the opening session
because of the need for Senators Jacob Javits and Claiborne Pell, along with
Senator Humphrey to return to Washington earlier than planned. This shift
resulted in a shortened time for the discussion.
Both
Pell and Javits are strong supporters of the arts and expressed the view that
government funding is too low. Javits said, "Even in a period of economic
retrenchment we ought to be giving $250 million—three times the present
amount—to the arts.
Javits
called for broadened public support of the arts at the box office. "Your
job is to find a way to bring the public in. The museums are doing this well,
but not theatre and music."
Javits
said, "State governments are far more derelict than the Federal Government
in supporting the arts."
That
view was echoed by State Representative Mickey Leland of Houston who called
Texas spending for the arts "deplorable" and said, "I wish the
people of Texas would rise up and demand more spending for the arts. It gives
blacks and Mexican-Americans an opportunity to participate."
Most
of the panelists agreed that the spectre of government control of the arts is
nonexistent at present. Actor Kirk Douglas, in a lively intervention, said,
"We are nowhere near the danger point of government interference with such
piddling amounts as have been received."
Douglas
suggested, "Let's take off one level of overkill capability and give it to
the arts."
Thomas
Fichandler, executive director of Arena Stage in Washington, D.C., said,
"Legislators are far behind the people. People are voting for the arts by
their attendance." He cited record crowds at his theatre and at concerts
and museums.
Dean
William B. Cannon of the LBJ School served as summarizer for the panel. He
suggested that although there was not direct censorship, there were indications
that "we are perhaps facing a more subtle form of censorship." He
referred to comments about a growing arts bureaucracy, narrow decision-making
base, and lack of democratization. He noted that there were a number of
suggestions for getting more public support and some practical ways of doing
that.
Cannon
said, "Art and the government have made an accomodation of a good sort. It
wasn't clear that it would be that way...We can be satisfied with the base
which has been established."
Senator
Humphrey, noting the meagre sum of arts funding in the first year ($2.5
million) said, "We have traveled a tremendous distance thus far. Such
spending was once regarded by many as foolish and outrageous."
However,
Humphrey said that it would be difficult to increase the present level of
funding "even though it is totally insufficient."
Recalling
the experience of the 1930s when artists "were put to work in their own
disciplines" in the Federal Arts Project of the Works Progress
Administration (WPA), Humphrey suggested that artists could be employed under
the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA).
The
panel discussion on Art and the Participant featured comments by
Robert Merrill, star baritone of the Metropolitan Opera, who said the way to
create more interest in the arts was to take arts to the people. He said one of
his "greatest thrills" was performing at free concerts in public
parks.
Michael
Straight, deputy chairman of the National Endowment, said the Endowment is
"supporting the core of institutions which have continued the great art of
the past...and at the same time recognizing the native American productions,
the storefront communications productions, the art of the poor people and
depressed cultures, which is struggling to come up..."
In
opening the symposium, Harry Middleton, director of the LBJ Library, said
President Johnson had wanted to make the Library "an active and creative
center." Certainly that goal was achieved during the symposium.
FEA'S JOHN
HILL TO SPEAK OCTOBER 27
John
A. Hill, deputy administrator of the Federal Energy Administration, will speak
at the Thompson Conference Center at 5 p.m. on Monday October 27 under the
sponsorship of the LBJ School.
Hill,
from Midland, Texas, will discuss the experience of the FEA in regulating the
energy industries. He will review developments in the period since the
international oil embargo and focus on the changing relationships between
government and the energy industries.
Hill
will also look to the future role of the government in the energy area and
offer his views about needed changes.
Prior
to accepting his position with the FEA, Hill served as associate director for
natural resources of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and before that was
deputy director for natural resources. Hill is head of the Administration's
Natural Gas Task Force and has actively supported the deregulation of
interstate natural gas prices. He has said deregulation is "essential if
more gas is going to become available."
The
FEA was established in May, 1974, to consolidate and reorganize energy-related
functions of government. It replaced the Federal Energy Office (FEO), which had
been created in December, 1973, by Executive Order.
"On the
Record"
.
I. B.
Helburn, associate professor of management, and Albert Blum, professor of
public affairs, will speak at a brown-bag luncheon in the Student Lounge on
Tuesday October 14 at noon. Helburn and Blum will discuss Public Employee
Unionism, focusing on the current situation in Austin.
.
Dagmar Hamilton, assistant professor of government, will speak to the Austin
League of Women Voters on Tuesday, October 14 on The Office of the
Executive. Hamilton teaches in the Policy Process Sequence, which includes a
section on the Executive. Her talk to the LWV is in connection with the
League's current study project on the Executive.
.
The Internship Committee will meet with members of the first-year class on
Wednesday October 15 from 4 to 6 p.m. in the Student Lounge. "This will be
the first meeting of the year for discussion of summer internships and
first-year students should plan to attend," Elizabeth Hall, director of
student affairs, said. Dr. John Gronouski is chairman of the Internship
Committee. Other faculty members are Professors Jurgen Schmandt, Albert Blum,
and Lynn Anderson. Hall and Barry Lovelace of the Office of Research are
ex-officio members. Cris Klauser and Rick Gentry are members from the
second-year class.
.
State Senator Lloyd Doggett of Austin will be the speaker at a special
student-sponsored brown-bag luncheon in the Student Lounge at noon on Wednesday
October 22. Doggett will speak on the proposed new Texas Constitution and other
current items of interest in state affairs.
.
On Tuesday October 28 at 12 noon there will be a brown-bag luncheon discussion
of women's problems, featuring a panel of women from the LBJ School faculty,
staff, and student body. The discussion will be in conjunction with a national
women's strike scheduled for October 29 and sponsored by the National
Organization of Women (NOW), according to Chris Klauser, spokesperson for a
group from the LBJ School which is taking part. Details on the program will be
included in the next issue of The Record.
.
Daniel J. Reed, assistant archivist for Presidential Libraries of the National
Archives and Records Service, was the speaker at a brown-bag luncheon in the
Student Lounge on Tuesday September 30. Reed, who was here in conjunction with
the Arts Symposium, discussed Presidential papers, the role of Presidential
Libraries, and other topics.
.
George D. Wingate, deputy personnel director, Office of the Governor, will meet
with second-year students at noon on Wednesday October 15 in the Student
Lounge. Mr. Wingate will discuss such subjects as how to apply for state
employment; what kind of qualifications state agencies look for; and the best
manner in which to approach state agencies. On Wednesday October 29 at noon,
Joe Ondrey of the College of Business Administration will meet with second-year
students in the Student Lounge. He will discuss resumes, interviewing, and job
applications.
.
Dr. Thomas Philpott, associate professor of history, is scheduled to be the
speaker at a student-sponsored brown-bag luncheon on Tuesday October 21 at noon
in the Student Lounge.
RICHTER
DICUSSES LOBBYING
Walter
H. Richter, director of government relations for the Association of Texas
Electric Cooperatives, spoke at a student-sponsored brown-bag luncheon on
October 7. Richter is a former State Senator and has also served as state and
regional director of the Office of Economic Opportunity; director of the State
Program on Drug Abuse; and as chairman of the Governor's Commission on Aging.
He is serving as a district coordinator for the Campaign for the Texas Constitution.
Richter
spoke of his varying roles in government and politics and described himself as
"obsessed with the idea that the key to the business of improving society
significantly lies in extensive involvement and effective participation of
citizens in the political process."
He
said, "not much is being done in educating people as to how to do
this."
"One
reason I am in lobbying is to increase my insight and awareness as to how
lobbyists work," Richter said. "I would like to see this transferred
to citizens' lobbying."
He
said that although lobbyists are often pictured as "devious creatures and
manipulators," this is hardly accurate.
HUNTER
THOMPSON SPEAKS
Author-journalist
Hunter Thompson will deliver the first lecture in the 1975-76 University of
Texas Distinguished Speaker Series on Thursday October 23 at 8 p.m. in the LBJ
Library.
Thompson,
who is a proponent of a special brand of the "new journalism" which
has been called "gonzo journalism", is the national affairs editor
for Rolling Stone and author of Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72.
Thompson's
speech is sponsored by the Ideas and Issues Committee of the Texas Union. The
same series will feature playwright Edward Albee, broadcast journalist Dan
Rather, and U.S. Representative Barbara Jordan later in the school year.
PURVIS IN
DISCUSSION OF "AN INFORMED PUBLIC"
Hoyt
Purvis, director of publications at the LBJ School, recently appeared on the
University of Texas radio series, 200 Years, in a panel discussion
on "Government and An Informed Public." The program was broadcast on
KUT-FM October 10 and on 46 stations in Texas and 49 stations nationally.
Appearing
with Purvis were Dr. William Stott, associate professor of American Studies and
English, and David Anderson, professor of law.
The
panelists discussed the relationship between American government and media.
Purvis
who teaches an LBJ School topical seminar on "Government and the
Media," said that although the level of official candor in this country is
high in comparison with other nations, it is still lower than it should be.
"The government is not nearly as accessible as it should be," he
said. "A well-informed electorate is critical in a democracy, and the
American public does not have all the information it should."
Purvis
said that although government officials frequently proclaim support for
"openness" in Government, the gap between theory and practice has
been apparent from the beginning. He pointed out that at the Constitutional
Convention, George Washington reprimanded a delegate for leaving a copy of the
proceedings where the press might discover it.
The
panelists agreed that some important steps have been taken in recent years to
limit Government secrecy, including the "sunshine acts" and freedom
of information laws.
Earlier
Purvis appeared on a program on "The Role of the Media in Assessing
History in the Making" as part of the same series.
Dean
William B. Cannon will appear on a forthcoming 200 Years program.
PLANNING
CONTINUES FOR CONFERENCE ON WOMEN
Plans
are continuing for the conference on Women in Public Life, scheduled for November
10-11 and jointly sponsored by the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and the School
of Public Affairs.
The
conference is being organized in conjunction with the observance of International
Women's Year, and, according to Liz Carpenter, conference coordinator, is
"an event planned to inspire women to increased participation in public
life at all levels."
Among
those scheduled to take part in the conference are Governor Ella Grasso of
Connecticut; Hanna Gray, provost of Yale University; U.S. Representative
Barbara Jordan; and Elizabeth Reid, first assistant to the Prime Minister of
Australia and a speaker at the International Women's Year conference in Mexico
City earlier this year.
There
will also be a panel discussion on "The Women's Movement Through the
Media's Eyes," moderated by Bill and Judith Moyers.
Participants
in the LBJ School Policy Research Project on Public Policy on the Status of
Women
are assisting in the planning of the Conference and will be taking an active
part in the program.
DR. PRICE
DISCUSSES R&D RELATIONSHIPS
The
relationship between research and development and the relative position of the
United States in the world of science were subjects of a talk by Dr. Derek
Price, Avalon Professor for History of Science at Yale at the LBJ School on
October 3.
Price
said research in the U. S. is in a "perilous position" and that when
research and development (R&D) are separated, "very little is left in
the R." He said that only 1 per cent of federal spending is actually used
to finance the scientific and technical community when it is separated from the
"D".
"We
need to disaggregate R&D," Price said, "so we'll know what we're
really getting."
Price
said, "We should avoid getting hooked on the 'cancer research syndrome'.
It is quite clear that simply by large-scale financing of a particular project
you will not necessarily get the solution. But you may get some valuable
spinoffs and that is important."
Price
said, "R&D in the U.S. peaked out in 1967," and added that the
U.S. "is very rapidly falling behind other nations in science."
"The
growth rate in science is one-half of what it was 10 years ago," Price
said. "There is a loss of richness of American ingenuity. We are not
deploying our brainpower."
"The
young today only have about one-third the chance of getting a job of creative
opportunity," he said.
Price
said, "Cutbacks in funds and the labor force in academia will affect those
at the lowest level—those just beginning—and will cutoff
growth."
FOREST
CONGRESS:
SPURR
RECOMMENDS FOREST POLICY
In
the keynote address to the recent Sixth American Forest Congress in Washington,
D. C., Dr. Stephen H. Spurr, professor of public affairs and of botany, said
America's national forest policies should be designed to meet the twin goals of
economic well-being and quality of life.
Spurr
and Dr. Keith Arnold, associate dean of the LBJ School and director of UT's
Division of Natural Resources and Environment, had major roles at the Congress.
Arnold was to deliver an address summarizing the Congress.
Speaking
on October 7, Spurr stated his belief that "forests can be managed to grow
trees for timber and simultaneously to satisfy most hunting, hiking, and
camping activities."
Spurr,
who has served on a national task force drafting policy proposals for the
future of renewable resources, suggested that "forests should be managed
for the good of mankind, taking into consideration the need for economic
returns and the need to maintain our woodlands as part of the world
ecosystem."
He
noted that the task of balancing tangible and intangible returns from national
forests and of "weighing economic and social benefits from the forest in a
single computational model" will be difficult and complex, and will
require the greatest talents of the professional forester.
Spurr
emphasized that America's national forests should continue to be managed as a
renewable natural resource, noting that "constant adjustments" will
have to be made to maintain the balanced man-forest ecosystem under changing
conditions.
While
observing that much of the public equate foresters with "wood
butchers," Spurr claimed that foresters need flexible policies to operate
under in order to facilitate the balance in the man-forest ecosystem.
With
such flexibility, Spurr said, "it may well be that some forests will be
overcut while others will be undercut in a given period of time; that some
forests will be liquidated while other forests will be withdrawn from exploitative
use; and that some forests will be used for many purposes while others will be
restricted insofar as man's involvement is concerned."
Spurr,
who is a forest ecologist, said he did not favor a rigid national forest policy
that would require "arbitrary enforcement of sustained yield practices for
small areas on a non-declining even-flow annual basis."
Rather,
he said, "if we are truly committed to managing the forests as a renewable
natural resource, then it is essential that we define our units of management
at some larger level of integration and our period of planning at some
reasonable span of years, and that we insist upon a continuous high level of
production of goods and services for the defined area and span of time."
Dr.
Spurr acknowledged that while the goals of economic well-being and quality of
life "can be satisfied to a considerable extent by our public and private
forests in the largest sense," the two goals become incompatible at a
single place in the forest at a single point of time.
"The
cutting of a single large tree supplies all-important wood to commerce,"
he said, "but it is no longer there to be seen and enjoyed."
He
explained that such a parallel does not exist for other natural resources,
"at least for the time being."
"Coal
and oil were not beautiful before harvest," he pointed out. "Wheat
and corn fields have a certain man-formed beauty that is destroyed by harvest,
but we know that they will be there again in but a short season after harvest.
"Our
emotional stress is over trees," he said. "Joyce Kilmer never wrote a
poem about a coal seam."
Dr.
Spurr also observed that forest policy must be viewed as only a part of U.S.
national policy in general, and he warned the audience of foresters that
"we cannot disengage ourselves from the whole."
He
pointed out, for example, that foresters should realize U.S. policy on the
import and pricing of oil will influence the use of wood as a source of energy
and as a chemical feedstock, while U.S. policy on the logging of public lands
will affect the cost of housing and the U.S. national balance of trade.
Dr.
Spurr said that decisions affecting the value of the dollar relative to foreign
currencies may change the recreational habits of Americans, thereby increasing
the recreational pressure on public lands.
BRITISH
COMMENTATOR TO SPEAK OCTOBER 30
A
distinguished British historian and political commentator, Professor Max
Beloff, will speak at the LBJ School on Thursday October 30 in the East Campus
Lecture Hall.
Beloff
will speak on America in the World and the Change of Generations—A
British Observer's Comment.
Professor
Beloff has contributed to many leading European and American publications,
including The New York Times and Foreign Affairs. When his book, Thomas Jefferson and American
Democracy, was published in 1948, he admitted that "for a non-American
to attempt to enter the field of American historical writing betrays some
degree of temerity."
However,
the study was well received, and subsequent books include: The Debate on the
American Revolution, The American Federal Government, and The United States and the
Unity of Europe.
During
previous visits to the United States, Beloff was at the Institute for Advanced
Study at Princeton and a Visiting Scholar at the Brookings Institution.
After
study and research at Oxford, Beloff began a teaching career at Manchester
University. His teaching was interrupted by service in World War II, but
afterwards he returned to Manchester to teach American History and he wrote the
book that established him as a profound political writer—The Foreign
Policy of Soviet Russia.
Later
he returned to Oxford and in 1957 was elected to the Gladstone Professorship of
Government and Public Administration there. He was instrumental in establishing
the study of Soviet politics at Oxford.
In
1975 Beloff became Principal of the new University College at Buckingham, in
southern England, an enterprise independent of state aid.