THE RECORD

NOVEMBER 10, 1975

VOL. 1, No. 13

LYNDON B. JOHNSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

EDITOR Hoyt H. Purvis

"WOMEN IN PUBLIC LIFE" CONFERENCE BEGINS TODAY

One of the year's major events at the LBJ School, the Conference on Women in Public Life, begins Monday morning with a program featuring an address by Elizabeth Reid, assistant to the Prime Minister of Australia.

The Conference, which continues through Tuesday, is part of the observance of International Women's Year (IWY) and follows the United Nations World Conference on International Women's Year held in Mexico City earlier this year.

Reid, who will speak at the 10 a.m. opening session in the LBJ Library, was head of the Australian delegation to the UN Conference and her topic will be After Mexico City—What?.

According to Ms. magazine, Reid is "a philosopher with grounding in economic theory as well as in political science." The magazine said she "is probably the highest-placed feminist in any national government today."

Many of the leading women in public life in Texas and the nation will be taking part in the two-day event.

Reid's speech will be followed by a panel discussion on Common and Uncommon Problems Around the World, moderated by Dr. Ruth Bacon, director of the U.S. Center for IWY.

Tuesday afternoon's program will begin with addresses by Representative Barbara Jordan on The American Woman in a Changing World and by Ambassador Carol Laise, director-general of the Foreign Service, on Trends in Foreign Policy and the Role of Women.

At 3 p.m. Monday a panel discussion on The Women's Movement Through the Eyes of the Media is scheduled. Moderators for the panel will be Judith and Bill Moyers.

Panelists will include Susan Tolchin, director, Washington Institute for Women in Politics; Sey Chassler, editor, Redbook magazine; Peggy Simpson of the Associated Press and President of the Washington Press Club; Molly Ivins, co-editor, The Texas Observer; Isabelle Shelton, Washington Star; Susan Caudill, KERA-TV, Dallas; and Scott Tagliarino, editor, The Daily Texan.

Responders will be Jill Ruckelshaus, director, U.S. Commission on IWY; Mary Virginia Busby, U.S. Center for IWY; Deborah Leff, information specialist on the women's movement; Patricia Lindh, assistant to President Ford; and Cathy Bonner, chairperson, Austin Commission on the Status of Women. Leonore Hershey, editor-in-chief, Ladies Home Journal, and IWY commissioner will be the summarizer.

Tuesday will be another full day of activities beginning with an open session of the U.S. Committee on Women in Power at 9:30 a.m. Hanna Gray, provost of Yale University, will preside at the session on Exploring the Gains and Gaps of Women in the Power Structure of Texas. State Representative Sarah Weddington of Austin will present the Texas witnesses who will include Frances Farenthold, former president of the National Women's Political Caucus; Federal Judge Sarah T. Hughes; Judge Mary Pearl Williams; Rosa Walker, lobbyist for the AFL-CIO; Barbara Vackar, coordinator, Texans for the ERA; Mayor Lila Cockrell of San Antonio; State Representatives Chris Miller of Fort Worth, Eddy Bernice Johnson of Dallas, Kay Bailey of Houston, and Wilhemina Delco of Austin; and Ida Powell, law student and graduate of the LBJ School.

Tuesday afternoon's sessions will begin with 15 workshops which are being planned and organized by LBJ School Students in the Policy Research Project on Public Policy on the Status of Women, directed by Professors Beryl A. Radin and Joe Feagin. (See Conference Workshops for a complete listing.)

Participants will reconvene in the LBJ Library at 3:30 p.m. Tuesday for a final wrap-up session. The featured speaker will be former Representative Martha Griffiths of Michigan, who will be introduced by Carol Crabtree, UT student body president. Griffiths will speak on Power—How to Get It and How to Use It.

A panel composed of Dean William B. Cannon of the LBJ School, Professor Radin, and LBJ School students will conclude the conference with a summary discussion.

In addition to the two full days of speakers, discussions and workshops, special evening events are also scheduled. On Sunday night a theater party was planned and on Monday night there will be a "'Texas Gala."

Sunday night's program included excerpts from motion picture and television films and a panel discussion. Gloria Steinem of Ms. magazine was to moderate the panel, which included James Brooks, producer of Rhoda; Virginia Carter, assistant to Norman Lear (Maude and All in the Family), and Ann Hassett, director of special projects for KNBC.

The Monday evening gala will be headed by Sandy Duncan, stage and television personality, and Erma Bombeck, columnist, who will speak on My Life and Hard Times in the Utility Room. Also on the program will be a readers' theater presentation directed by Ken Johnson of Austin's Center Stage and a musical performance by the Strawberry Pickers.

Liz Carpenter is coordinator for the Conference and Betty Tilson is assistant coordinator.

WEINTRAUB NAMED TO RUSK CHAIR

Dr. Sidney Weintraub, a broadly experienced U.S. State Department official whose field is international finance and economics, has been named as the first holder of the Dean Rusk Chair at the LBJ School.

The appointment, which becomes effective January 16, was announced by UT President Lorene L. Rogers upon recommendation of Dean William B. Cannon of the LBJ School. Weintraub will teach a topical seminar on international affairs in the spring semester.

Dr. Weintraub, under appointment of President Gerald Ford, has served since last January as Assistant Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID).

In that capacity he has the additional responsibility of being the first executive director of the inter-agency Development Coordination Committee, which examines all U.S. policies and programs bearing on the development of low-income countries.

The Rusk Chair, named in honor of the former Secretary of State under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, was created in March, 1974 with a $500,000 endowment from the Lyndon B. Johnson Foundation. Announcement of the endowment was made at that time by Mrs. Johnson, a member of the foundation's board and member of the UT System Board of Regents.

A faculty-student search committee, headed by Associate Dean Keith Arnold of the LBJ School, has been active during the past year in assessing candidates for the Rusk Chair.

Weintraub has visited the LBJ School on several occasions. In March he spoke at a schoolwide seminar, focusing on U.S. relations with developing nations.

In his role with the Development Coordination Committee, Weintraub directs the work of a committee whose membership includes senior representatives from the Departments of State, Treasury, Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, the Council on International Policy, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Export-Import Bank, National Security Council, and Office of Management and Budget.

His previous experience in the State Department, where he has served since 1949, includes years of participation in international negotiations and administration of substantive projects and skilled professionals.

From 1969 to 1974 he was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Finance and Development, dealing in areas involving operation and reform of the international monetary system, international investment, and U.S. participation in multilateral institutions such as the World Bank.

He held the concurrent posts of economic counselor of the U.S. Embassy in Santiago, Chile, and director of the AID mission to Chile from 1966 to 1969.

Dr. Weintraub also was with the State Department's Bureau of Economic Affairs from 1961 to 1965, serving the final two years as chief of the general commercial policy division.

From 1949 to 1961, he held foreign-service assignments in Madagascar, Mexico, Japan, Thailand, and Washington (as an international economist concerned with Japanese and Korean affairs).

He has been chairman of U.S. delegations and has participated in numerous international conferences under auspices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United Nations, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund.

Dr. Weintraub is the author of Trade Preferences for Less-Developed Countries: An Analysis of U.S. Policy, a number of articles and essays, and two mystery novels.

He earned a Ph.D. degree in economics from the American University, M.A. from Yale, Bachelor of Journalism and Master of Arts from the University of Missouri, and a Bachelor of Business Administration from the City College of New York.

Born May 18, 1922, in New York City, Dr. Weintraub is married to the former Gladys Katz, and they are the parents of three children.

"On the Record"

. Many of the nation's leading nuclear physicists attended the recent annual fall meeting of the Nuclear Division of the American Physical Society at the Thompson Center. A highlight of the meeting was a special panel discussion of federal science policy moderated by Dean William B. Cannon of the LBJ School. Joining Dean Cannon on the panel were Hugh Loweth, deputy associate director for science, space and technology of the Office of Management and Budget; Dr. Louis Rosen of Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory; and Dr. Alexander Vucinich, UT professor of history.

. A large number of LBJ School students, faculty, and staff met in the Student Lounge on October 28 for a discussion on women at the LBJ School. The discussion centered on problems encountered by women at the School and various forms of discrimination, some of which were described as "subtle discrimination." Attention was given to recruitment of women faculty and students and to the interviewing process. Representatives of the Admissions Committee said new interviewing guidelines are being developed. Dean William B. Cannon told the group that the School retains "a broad commitment" to the recruitment of women. Professor Jurgen Schmandt and Dagmar Hamilton served as moderators for the discussion, which was organized in conjunction with the national Alice Doesn't Day.

. Andrea Beatty, personnel director for the City of Austin, discussed placement in the Austin city government at a brown-bag luncheon in the Student Lounge on November 5.

CARL DISCUSSES PARTY NOMINATING PROCESS

Colin Carl, member of the State Democratic Executive Committee and an assistant attorney general, spoke at a brown-bag luncheon on November 4. He discussed the Presidential nominating process and Democratic Party rules changes.

Carl expressed his strong preference for conventions rather than primaries for choosing Presidential nominees. "Primaries destroy the essence of the Presidential nominating process," he said. "Most primaries are held well in advance of the convention. Candidates come and go and may be out of the race before the convention. Sometimes not all the candidates are on the ballot. Further, the primary process is open to people who are not actually within the party."

Carl said he thought "reform went awry in allowing loopholes in regulations for primaries" and said the 1976 Texas Democratic Presidential primary "is not really in compliance with the mandate of the 72 convention" even though it has been held to meet the standards of the Mikulski Commission.

CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS

The workshop subjects and locations for the Conference on Women in Public Life:

I . Women as Political Volunteers (Thompson Center 3.122)—facilitators: Vita Winick, Texas League of Women Voters, and Frieda Davis, Texas State Democratic Party; coordinator: Mary Jo Seeman, LBJ School.

2. Are You One of Those Trouble-making, Glory-Seeking Women's Libbers? (LBJ Library, 2d Floor Theater)—facilitators: Martha Smiley, Texas Women’s Political Caucus, and Luz Escamilla, San Antonio Commission on the Status of Women; coordinators: Rita Seymour, Leota Johnson, LBJ School.

3. Having Your Cake and Eating It Too: How Should You Be Treated (Thompson Center 3.120)—facilitators: Diane Hobby, and Emmie Craddock, mayor of San Marcos; coordinator: Cathy Bruns, LBJ School.

4. It's A Man's World: Developing Self-Confidence and Assertiveness (LBJ Library, 8th Floor West Conference Room)—facilitators: Billie Carr, Democratic National Committeewoman, Texas, and Liz Levatino, assistant attorney general of Texas; coordinator: Melanie McCoy, LBJ School.

5. "Can You Type?" Administrative Skill Development (LBJ School 3.110)—facilitators: Andrea Beatty, personnel director, City of Austin, and Kay Bard, Austin Model Cities; coordinator: Mary Ann Hauber, LBJ School.

6. Lifestyle and Public Life (LBJ School 3.111 )—facilitators: Emma Lou Linn, member, Austin City Council, and Sue Gibalis, Texas Department of Public Welfare; coordinator: Hannah Eisner, LBJ School.

7. Equal Pay for Equal Work (LIBJ School 3.107)—facilitators: Diane Van Helden, Governor's Office of Equal Employment Opportunity, and Rhobia Taylor, Dallas Regional Office, Women's Bureau; coordinator: Martha Katz, LBJ School.

8. I'm A Career Woman, Wife and Mother...In What Order? (LBJ School 3.108)—facilitators: State Representative Wilhelmina Delco and Martha Williams, UT School of Social Work; coordinator: Ellen Jones, LBJ School.

9. But What About the Children? (LBJ School 3.106)—facilitators: Janice Robinson, Texas Office of Early Childhood Development, and Ella Salazar, Child, Inc.; coordinator: Frank Sturzl, LBJ School.

10. After 40? (LBJ School 3.101 )—facilitators: Frances Plotsky, coordinator for continuing education for men and women, UT, and Mary Tisinger, adult services council; coordinator: Peggy Wilson, LBJ School.

11. Political Skill Development (Thompson Center 3.102)—facilitators: Jane Wells, member, State Board of Education, and Beryl Milburn, Republican State Committee; coordinator: Nan McRaven, LBJ School.

12. Women and The Law (LBJ School 3.109)—facilitators: Carol Haberman, city judge, San Antonio, and Louise Razzio, Dallas attorney; coordinator: Gwen Winnig, LBJ School.

13. Getting Ahead (LBJ School 3.103)—facilitators: Judy Tully, assistant professor of sociology, UT, and June Hyer, vice chancellor, University of Houston at Clear Lake; coordinator: Fran Zorn, LBJ School.

14. Women and the Lobbying Process (LBJ School 3.112)—facilitators: Barbara Vackar, director, Texans for ERA, and Ruth Ellinger, Texas State AFL-CIO; coordinator: Steve Cobble, LBJ School.

15. I Don't Want to be a Man: The Myth of Femininity Lost (LBJ School 3.102)—facilitators: Ann Richards, aide to Representative Sarah Weddington, and Barbara Meyers; coordinator: Mary Ann Coursey, LBJ School.

SCHOOL PUBLICATION SURVEYS PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION

Because of the lack of information, particularly in easily accessible form, about higher education for public affairs, public administration, and related fields in Texas, the LBJ School has published a comprehensive survey on the subject.

The published report (Higher Education for Public Affairs, Public Administration, and Related Fields in Texas: A Survey) will provide information about graduate and undergraduate programs offered at Texas colleges and universities, with statistics on the numbers of students, and faculty involved. In addition to public affairs and public administration, such related fields as urban and environmental studies, social work, and criminal justice and law enforcement are included.

The survey is divided into two sections. The first section examines graduate and undergraduate programs in public affairs and public administration. It includes summary narratives of these programs, followed by individual narratives describing the programs at each institution. A table listing pertinent data is included at the end of each narrative. The second section is divided into subsections for urban and environmental studies, criminal justice and law enforcement, and social work, with descriptions of each program.

The survey is intended for several audiences, including academicians, public officials, and prospective students. For academicians, it provides a summary of patterns and trends in their field, and information on curricular developments at other institutions. For public officials, especially those in personnel training and manpower positions, it may serve as a guide to sources of new talent from institutions of higher learning in Texas to programs of in-career training for public employees. For the student or potential student, it provides a look at opportunities for undergraduate and graduate study in these fields.

The survey was conducted under the direction of Professor Richard L. Schott of the LBJ School, assisted by Neil McFeeley and Gary Miller, graduate students in the Department of Government.

FEA'S FUTURE ROLE IN ENERGY REGULATION

John A. Hill, deputy administrator of the Federal Energy Administration, spoke on October 27 under the sponsorship of the LBJ School and the University's Center for Energy Studies. Following his talk, Hill answered questions on current energy issues. Here are excerpts from Hill's remarks:

...The actions taken by the oil-producing states involve substantial economic costs for the industrialized world, and perhaps a degree of danger for the stability of the international economy. But simultaneously, they have brought wealth, prestige, and influence to the producing countries. The high price of oil however regrettable, is, nevertheless, evidence that the producing countries are acting decisively in the pursuit of their own domestic and international interests.

This new strength stands in ironic contrast to Congressional indecision and divisiveness in the effort to establish a U.S. energy policy.

But it is not only the relationship between the governments of producing countries and the multi-national oil companies which has changed. The way in which the governments of consuming countries, particularly that of the United States, relate to their domestic petroleum industries is beginning to undergo significant alterations. And, in large part, these changes will be governed, for better or worse, by politics...

It won't come as a surprise to anyone here that classical laissez-faire capitalism has rarely been practiced in the United States—at least in this century—when vital industries were at issue.

Generally, the value of the energy industries has been recognized and it has become public policy to foster at least their survivial, and at times their expansion, for the good of the nation. This has been notably true of the oil industry which has benefited from preferential treatment such as the percentage depletion allowance.

Whether you favor or deplore the depletion allowance itself, or the whole idea of government involvement with this or any industry is, I think, immaterial. The fact remains that government at the federal, state, and local levels has historically had a close relationship to the oil industry. Until today, that relationship had been, almost always, supportive.

There is little question that the federal government will continue to be involved. The need for that involvement did not emerge from the expansive imagination of some meddlesome mid-level bureaucrat. It's a direct result of three things: energy shortages, shifting patterns of energy supply, and the real threat of future embargoes.

Those factors, as I see it, will require a future government role in three areas.

First, the government must be prepared to alleviate the hardships caused by limited supplies of expensive energy. Farmers, for instance, are almost wholly dependent on propane for drying crops. Propane, however, is the most popular substitute for natural gas.

As natural gas shortages grow in duration and intensity, propane demand rises, and so does its price. The effects of this situation on farmers and consumers is obvious—either less production or even higher farm prices to cover the costs of propane and fertilizer.

Likewise, we have a responsibility to lessen the economic impact of higher energy prices on those who can least afford it. That responsibility will persist because the cost of energy will continue to be high.

Second, shifting supply patterns make national coordination, as well as policing of the marketplace imperative, roles only the federal government can assume.

Low priced, abundant imports had certain effects on the geographical structure of the industry. New England simply imported all the low-cost refined product it needed. As a result, that region does not have a single refinery. In pre-embargo days, the area simply didn't need refineries, and the cost of imports didn't provide enough incentive to build them.

That has changed now. But today there are still significant constraints. Local regulations and resistance to change still militate against building refineries, so the federal government has had to assume a coordinating role, trying to clear bottlenecks.

In another area, the existence of refineries presents a problem, not because they are refineries, but because of their location. I'm talking about the Northern Tier refineries which are dependent almost exclusively on Canadian oil.

Canada is phasing out its exports to us—and to those northern tier refineries—completely. Should the government standby and watch that whole refinery system phase out along with the oil? Personally, I think not.

Moreover, with petroleum resources limited and thus a scramble for profits assured, there will be a need to police the marketplace to prevent unfair practices and assure competition. I'm thinking along the lines of vigorous anti-trust enforcement and Dealers Day in Court legislation.

Finally—and perhaps most important for the security of the country generally—we will, for the foreseeable future have to contend with the possibility of another embargo. That brings me to the third aspect of federal involvement—planning. I don't think any citizen, corporate or otherwise—wants the United States to be caught as totally unprepared for another embargo as we were in 1973. Preparation requires planning, and there is simply no way we can plan effectively for another embargo without information. So the days when the industry did not need to report its supply and production situation to the government are over—permanently.

BELOFF ANALYZES CHANGING GENERATIONS

Each generation of political leaders is influenced by conditions and attitudes prevalent during the generation's formative years. This influence, in turn, has significant impact on the policies supported by that generation when it comes to power.

This "generational analysis" of world affairs was provided by Professor Max Beloff, the distinguished British historian and political commentator, who spoke at the LBJ School on October 30.

"I more and more come to the view that historians tend to neglect the inexorable fact that one generation succeeds another," Beloff said. "The basic attitudes of individuals and their generation are those that are acquired at a relatively early age. They tend to be formed by what are the basic concerns at a time when they begin to be conscious of the problems in the world."

"People in power thus tend to be influenced by events 25 to 30 years in the past. They are preoccupied with the concerns of that earlier time," he said.

As an example he cited the trade union leaders in Britain "who were formed during a period of great depression and unemployment—a period of no inflation—and thus their inability to grapple with inflation now."

Beloff said those in power in the immediate post-World War II era had their basic introduction to world affairs after World War I and "had drawn the lesson...that the U.S. could not separate itself from the rest of the world."

Therefore, they attempted to create a new world order which, Beloff said, "contrary to revisionist historians was based on a position of continuance of a grand alliance including the U.S. and Soviet Union."

When this failed, he said, "this led to a second great American decision—an abandonment of universalist aspirations to a more limited effort: rebuilding Europe and Japan and creating stability."

"This was a period of very considerable success for the U.S.," Beloff said. "The Marshall Plan and the creation of the Atlantic Alliance are two of the greatest success stories in the history of international relations."

"But success, like failure, has its price," he said. "The price was a certain failure of imagination. After the initial bastions of world order had been set up in Western Europe and Japan the U.S. found the rest of the world in a period of rapid transformation."

"There were errors of diplomacy, such as trying to create parallels to NATO in CENTO and SEATO—'the mania for alliances' some have called it. There remains the more fundamental problem of whether the U.S. can combine the policy of helping these areas achieve stability without producing a hostile reaction."

Beloff said that "detente notwithstanding" the dyssymetry between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. has not been significantly reduced. "There are irreconcilable differences between the two systems."

"In any competition between democratic and totalitarian states there is an inborn disadvantage on the democratic side. Pluralist societies are more subject to internal criticism...Totalitarian countries are prepared to sacrifice human lives to an extent which democratic countries will do for only a very short time and under very great pressure."

Beloff said, "There are areas of obvious common interest between the U.S. and Soviet Union, such as nuclear arms limitations. What worries people is the assumption of common interest in areas where it does not exist. There may be a good reason for agreements with the Soviet Union about great freedom of information, movement, etc., as long as your people understand that the Soviet interpretation of what these agreements mean is quite different."

Beloff said, "Any British government we can foresee in reasonable time is going to be aligned with the policies of the U.S."

Beloff said, "The generation which produced the successes of the forties and fifties has almost completely passed from the scene. The generation of the fifties and sixties is passing from the scene with a very checkered record. The new generation coming to power has had the experience of the anomalies of recent years. There is a tendency to want to withdraw and think it over. The debate is on new lines with new subjects—economics and energy."

HUNGER CONFERENCE SET

A National University Conference on Hunger will be held November 21-23 at The University of Texas.

Sponsors of the meeting are the Institute for World Order, and the Washington-based Project Dialogue, which is a joint educational program of the Student Advisory Committee on International Affairs and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

All sessions of the conference—with the exception of meals—are admission-free and are open to any interested person.

Among a wide range of participants in the conference will be U.S. Senator Dick Clark of Iowa, who was a U.S. representative to the 1974 World Food Conference in Rome and is a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee; William Sloane Coffin, Yale University chaplain; Neville Kanakaratne, the Sri Lanka ambassador to the U.S., and Frances Moore Lappe, co-founder of the Institute of Food and Development Policy and author of "Diet for a Small Planet."

Through a series of workshops, the conference will attempt to develop an agenda for action on food issues, create a greater awareness of the urgency of the hunger problem, identify areas of research regarding hunger in which universities can become involved, and examine domestic and international policies which affect hunger.

Various task forces and workshop sessions will be held in the Thompson Conference Center, Law School classrooms, and the Villa Capri. Two plenary sessions will be held in the Charles I. Francis Auditorium of Townes Hall, the first, on November 21 at 7:30 p.m., being devoted to "The Right to Food: Components of a National Food Policy."

[news note]

The Total Institution Follies, sponsored by a group of LBJ School students, are scheduled for Friday November 21 from 7:30 to 11 p.m. at the Alumni Center. Tickets are $1 and up and are available from members of the organizing group.

CONFERENCE ON WOMEN IN PUBLIC LIFE/Workshops Tuesday, Nov. 11, 1975 1:30 PM

Thompson Center, Room 3.122 — 1. WOMEN AS POLITICAL VOLUNTEERS

LBJ LIBRARY, 2nd floor Theatre — 2. "ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE TROUBLE-MAKING, GLORY-SEEKING WOMEN'S LIBBERS?

Thompson Center, Room 3.120 — 3. HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO: HOW SHOULD YOU BE TREATED?

LBJ LIBRARY, 8th Floor, West Conference Room — 4. IT'S A MAN'S WORLD: DEVELOPING SELF CONFIDENCE AND ASSERTIVENESS

LBJ School, Room 3.110 — 5. "CAN YOU TYPE?": ADMINISTRATIVE SKILL DEVELOPMENT

LBJ School, Room 3.111 — 6. LIFESTYLE AND PUBLIC LIFE

LBJ School, Room 3.107 — 7. EQUAL PAY FOR EQUAL WORK

LBJ School, Room 3.108 — 8. I'M A CAREER WOMAN, WIFE AND MOTHER...IN WHAT ORDER?

LBJ School, Room 3.106 — 9. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?

LBJ School, Room 3.101 —10. AFTER 40?

Thompson Center, Room 3.102 —11. POLITICAL SKILL DEVELOPMENT

LBJ School, Room 3.109 —12. WOMEN AND THE LAW

LBJ School, Room 3.103 —13. GETTING AHEAD

LBJ School, Room 3.112 —14. WOMEN AND THE LOBBYING PROCESS

LBJ School, Room 3.102 —15 I DON'T WANT TO BE A MAN: THE MYTH OF FEMININITY LOST

See page 3 for details.