![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
An Ideal CTC: Strategies for Community Development from Austin Community Technology CentersComprehensive ProgrammingA community-based organization with comprehensive programming will be more effective at developing a sophisticated level of skills, personal and professional relationships, and resources among the community members it serves. This requires the CTC to take a holistic approach, specifically one where the CTC director and staff take seriously the diverse strengths and needs of a community. The CTC must work to remove barriers to development as much as it works to increase development opportunities. The CTC should also actively recruit a wide variety of community members and participants to enhance the quality of human networks within the organization. When an organization's activities are predicated on a true understanding of the community, a holistic experience will increase participants' economic, social, and physical well-being. An ideal CTC would offer programs beyond computer instruction that meet participant needs and remove barriers to development.Many CTCs in Austin began as something other than a community technology center. From parenting classes to home buying courses to after school meal programs, each of these organizations have demonstrated a clear understanding of what their participants need to build capacity in their respective neighborhoods. Without these programs, people and communities cannot develop to their full potential. Assets we observed:
Barriers CTCs face: Some CTCs are experiencing difficulty in proceeding with comprehensive programming initiatives due to lack of resources. For example, Tech Tots is having trouble recruiting Hispanic mentors who are familiar with participants' language and culture. CTCs may also not be aware that certain community members cannot participate in the center's programs because barriers are present. An ideal CTC would have resources and knowledge available to include participants, volunteers, and staff with special needs.Including people with disabilities is crucial to fulfill the promise of public access to technology. Rates of disability are higher in communities of color and low-income communities, and folks with disabilities in these groups may not be in contact with organizations that serve the disability community. An ideal CTC would recognize that these people are a valuable part of the community and encourage them to contribute to community development. Assets we observed:
Barriers CTCs face: CTCs may believe that providing access for people with disabilities is difficult and requires a large initial investment. They may not know where to go for training in selection of adaptive technology. Much of the early grant funding from the Texas TIF (Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund) and federal agencies was given without any guidance to organizations about how to incorporate accessibility. An ideal CTC would do testing and re-testing of the organization's assumptions about the participants served and what their needs are.Assets we observed:
Barriers CTCs face: CTCs may be dependent upon one individual or a small group of committed participants to assess participants' needs. Future ResearchOur participatory research approach permitted each of us to observe and sometimes actually take part in the programs that CTCs offer their participants. Our engagement allowed us to come away with substantive qualitative data to include in our research findings. Some of the research tools we employed were effective for obtaining information, but suggest continuing to seek alternative ways to increase the validity and reliability of the findings. Our participant and staff surveys examined self-report of skills and knowledge before and after participating in CTC programs, as well as how programs were developed. Future research designs may include more questions that investigate and identify barriers that may affect skill and knowledge outcomes, and may impede program development. Furthermore, increased interaction with the participants and staff would have added to the content validity of our questionnaires. Finally, more research is needed in the area of special needs. This population is often ignored in the discussion of inclusionary practices regarding technology programs for the disenfranchised. |
More infoWorking Hypothesis about Comprehensive Programming Download the complete report: An Ideal CTC (Microsoft Word) Read the report online:
this page last updated |
|