Adolescent Brains Biologically Wired to Engage in Risky Behavior, Study Finds

June 3, 2010

AUSTIN, Texas — There are biological motivations behind the stereotypically poor decisions and risky behavior associated with adolescence, new research from a University of Texas at Austin psychologist reveals.

Previous studies have found that teenagers tend to be more sensitive to rewards than either children or adults. Now, Russell Poldrack and fellow researchers have taken the first major step in identifying which brain systems cause adolescents to have these urges and what implications these biological differences may hold for rash adolescent behavior.

"Our results raise the hypothesis that these risky behaviors, such as experimenting with drugs or having unsafe sex, are actually driven by over activity in the mesolimbic dopamine system, a system which appears to be the final pathway to all addictions, in the adolescent brain," Poldrack said.
Poldrack, a professor in the departments of Psychology and Neurobiology, directs the university's Imaging Research Center, where researchers use functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology (fMRI) to study brain activity. He collaborated on the study with researchers at UCLA, including Jessica Cohen and Robert Asarnow.

In the study, participants ranging in age from eight to 30 performed a learning task in which they categorized an abstract image into one of two categories and were given feedback displaying the correct response. To ensure motivation, they were given monetary rewards for each correct answer.

What the researchers were most interested in, however, was how each participant's brain responded to "reward prediction error" (or the difference between an expected outcome of an action and the actual outcome) as they learned to categorize the images.

"Learning seems to rely on prediction error because if the world is exactly as you expected it to be, there is nothing new to learn," Poldrack said.  Previous research has shown that the dopamine system in the brain is directly responsive to prediction errors.

Researchers measured so-called positive prediction error signals in the participants' brains as the participants discovered the results of their answers and the size of their rewards. Teenagers showed the highest spikes in these prediction error signals, which likely means they had the largest dopamine response.

Dopamine is known to be important for the motivation to seek rewards. It follows, then, that the greater prediction error signals in the adolescent brain could result in increased motivation to acquire more positive outcomes, and therefore greater risk-taking.

Poldrack is confident future studies will further explore the biological reasons for stereotypical adolescent behavior. As to whether any study can absolve teens of blame for their antics, he said, "That's a question for the philosophers."

These findings were published last month online in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

For more information, contact: Gary Susswein, Office of the President, 512-471-4945; Russell Poldrack, Imaging Research Center, 512-850-6189.

2 Comments to "Adolescent Brains Biologically Wired to Engage in Risky Behavior, Study Finds"

1.  Shanan Cox said on June 12, 2010

Russell, Would you believe there was a dopamine imbalance if the child is a high-risk taker with a seemingly low level of intrinsic motivation? Can a dopamine imbalance/over-activity be corrected?

2.  Rodrigo C Pinto said on June 13, 2010

The text above doesn't give details so we don't know if there were differences between the tests/images that were showed to the participants, but assuming they were the same they would present significantly different challenges for an 8 year old, a 15 year old and a 30-year-old person. I wonder if the highest response from teenagers could be just the result of the fact that the test had the right level of challenge/motivation for them, therefore too difficult for children and too easy for adults. I suppose that in these extreme situations, the test would become frustrating for the people taking them and so their response to it would be less intense.

Just food for thought because trying to explain teenagers will continue to be the real big challenge!