Engineers Improve Recycling System in Hydraulic Fracturing to Save Water and Energy

Aug. 14, 2013

AUSTIN, Texas — Chemical engineers at The University of Texas at Austin have developed high-efficiency, durable filters to improve mobile water recycling systems used in hydraulic fracturing, the oil and gas drilling process known as fracking. The filters may significantly reduce the amount of water and energy that fracking requires.

Professor Benny Freeman and his research team in the McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering completed a study that shows their membrane-based filtration system improves the efficiency of treating and safely reusing water used for fracking at drill sites. The study shows that the team’s filter can produce up to 50 percent more water for reuse compared with other filtration systems, greatly reducing demand for fresh water. In addition to producing a higher volume of purified water, the new filter system also operates at lower pressure than traditional systems, meaning significant energy savings. The findings were recently published in the Journal of Membrane Science.

The technology could help reduce the environmental impact and financial costs of fracking, which has seen intense growth during the past decade because of advances in horizontal drilling. As production continues to increase, the National Petroleum Council estimates that 80 percent of wells drilled during the next decade will require fracking.

“Recycling flowback water on-site offers a cost-effective solution that conserves water and energy, saves roads from wear and tear and keeps production costs down,” said Dan Miller, a UT Austin researcher on Freeman’s team who helped develop the filtration system as a graduate student. “Everyone who uses water and natural gas can benefit from this technology.”

The team’s water recycling system is licensed by The University of Texas at Austin to Advanced Hydro Inc., which was founded by Freeman in 2009.

The team’s pilot study tested a system of specially coated membranes, which are pliable sheet-like structures made out of plastic that act as a barrier, to filter contaminated water that returns to the surface after it is pumped down a well during fracking.

The process of hydraulic fracturing pumps millions of gallons of water mixed with sand and chemicals down a well at high pressure to break, or fracture, shale rock to extract natural gas and oil trapped deep underground. Each well can use up to 6 million gallons of water during the hydraulic fracturing phase of production, which can last a week — this is equivalent to nine Olympic-size pools.

The advantage of the team’s approach is a patented coating that makes membranes more resistant to damage caused by contaminants, also known as fouling. Mixtures of salt, oils and other particles often clog membranes and cause significant, irreversible deterioration that shortens their lifespan. The coating, which helps membranes last longer, is a water-based solution that can be easily applied to membrane surfaces by simply rinsing it through the recycling system.

Prof. Benny Freeman (back Left) with researchers Dan Miller (back right), Zhengwang “Lisa” He (front left) and Sirirat “Peach” Kasemset (front right) showing membrane sample holders used in their work at the UT Austin J.J. Pickle Research Center.

“Our students developed the concept of using polydopamine as an adhesive coating that attracts a layer of tightly bound water molecules to protect membranes from direct contact with contaminants,” Freeman said. “This makes membranes more durable, easier to clean and more energy-efficient, which could reduce operational costs by half.”

Other membrane coating approaches must be applied before production is finalized and require new manufacturing methods or harsh chemicals that can cause deterioration.

More efficient membranes enable the team to build a more compact system that is easier to move from drill site to drill site. These improvements make recycling at the drilling site a competitive alternative to conventional practices of either disposing of flowback water in wastewater wells or trucking it to treatment facilities.

“Disposal costs run $1.50 to $2 a barrel and transportation costs to disposal sites can add up to $4 a barrel,” Freeman said. “Recycling flowback water at the drill site can address both of these costs and make reuse a viable economic option.”

 

Editors Note:

Disclosure

The University of Texas at Austin is committed to transparency and disclosure of all potential conflicts of interest of its researchers. Dr. Freeman has received funding for water purification research from various public and private entities including the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation. He has also served as a consultant to several companies and is a Fellow of several organizations including the American Chemical Society, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

He formed the Austin-based startup Advanced Hydro Inc. in 2009. The company supplies high-performance membranes and pre-treatment processes for purifying and reclaiming oil- and gas-related wastewater, and the desalination of brackish groundwater or seawater for drinking or industrial use. He is also a member of the Journal of Membrane Science editorial board.

Imagery for this story

High-resolution images are available on the McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering's Flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mckettadepartmentofchemicalengineering/9358394543/in/set-72157634783483336/

 

 

For more information, contact: Marisa Meier, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering College of Engineering, 512-471-3837.

1 Comment to "Engineers Improve Recycling System in Hydraulic Fracturing to Save Water and Energy"

1.  Adam said on Aug. 15, 2013

It is really disturbing to know that up until recently, most of the waste water from these productions were simply discarded carelessly. It is great to finally see that companies are realizing they can save money using a water filter system to recycle the waste water and reuse it. Although there are still many companies not following these procedures, the more that do will set an example that will hopefully become a standard in this industry.