University of Texas

News

New Paper: The Politics and Statistics of Value-Added Modeling for Accountability of Teacher Preparation Programs

Congratulations to Drs. Jane Lincove and Cynthia Osborne and co-authors, Amanda Dillon and Nick Mills, on acceptance of their paper, “The Politics and Statistics of Value-Added Modeling for Accountability of Teacher Preparation Programs,” in theĀ Journal of Teacher Education.

Abstract:

Despite questions about validity and reliability, the use of value-added estimation methods has moved beyond academic research into state accountability systems for teachers, schools, and teacher preparation programs (TPPs). Prior studies of value-added measurement for TPPs test the validity of researcher-designed models and find that measuring differences across programs is difficult. This study is the first to examine the reliability and usefulness of a value-added model for TPPs developed through a collaborative stakeholder process and mandated by state law for use in accountability. Based on the experience of developing a test-based metric for Texas TPPs, our results suggest that although value-added results are highly correlated across specifications, accountability status for individual programs is very sensitive to decisions about accountability criteria, the selection of teachers, and the selection of control variables.

Click for full text (PDF).