Our Initiatives

First Year Ed White Middle School Restorative Discipline Report Now Available

The Institute has provided training, assistance and evaluation for Ed White Middle School in San Antonio, Texas, as they seek to implement restorative discipline as an alternative to more punitive practices.

The evaluation report can be accessed here - Ed White Middle School Restorative Discipline Evaluation: Implementation and Impact, 2012/2013, Sixth Grade. (PDF)


____________________________________________

Restorative Justice Dialogue for Hate Crimes & Bias-Motivated Incidents

Restorative justice has been used successfully in a number of hate crimes and bias-motivated incidents. Because of its focus on community and community resources, it is in a unique place to advance healing not just for the immediate victim but for others from the same community who are indirectly targeted by the offender. Hate Crimes

IRJRD encourages the use of restorative justice dialogue for bias-motivated violence and intimidation. It has provided consultation to the Austin/Travis County Hate Crimes Task Force through the following activities:


  • Education about restorative justice and hate crimes to members of the Restoration Work Group, Austin/Travis County Hate Crimes Task Force.
  • Development of procedures to conduct Community Circles with victims of bias-motivated incidents and public servants responsible for responding to such incidents.
  • Facilitation of a Community Circle for persons directly experiencing or responding to hate crime and bias-motivated incidents.
  • Evaluation of the Community Circle (PDF)
  • Training of facilitators for Community Circles.

  • ____________________________________________

    Restorative Justice Practices for Domestic Violence

    Within the past decade, domestic violence practitioners, along with restorative justice researchers and practitioners, have begun to debate the merits of using restorative justice for domestic violence. Proponents encourage using restorative justice to address domestic violence, claiming it offers more options and benefits to victims, holds offenders directly accountable for their abuse, and stimudvlates community discussion about domestic violence.  Opponents claim restorative justice is inherently risky to victims and lacks adequate safety measures. The potential risks of using restorative justice to address domestic violence have prompted practitioners to think twice about developing and implementing restorative justice initiatives to address domestic violence.   As a result, the debate over applying restorative justice to domestic violence has remained largely theoretical in scope.

    IRJRD promotes the use of modified versions or restorative justice practices for domestic violence through the following activities:

  • Identification of seven viable models of restorative justice practice for domestic violence in the US and Canada.
  • Consultation to SafePlace, an Austin non-profit providing services for victims and survivors of sexual and domestic abuse.
  • Presentations to the Travis County Family Violence Task Force.
  • Consultation to Resolve to Stop the Violence Everyday (R.A.V.E.) program, Travis County Sherriff's Department.
  • Initiative to replicate the Cultural Context Model developed by the Institute for Family Services, Somerset, New Jersey.
  • Co-sponsorship of a conference on restorative justice and domestic violence for community agencies.

    ____________________________________________

    Implementation of Restorative Justice for Student Misconduct

    The use of restorative justice on college and university campuses is a growing trend.   Institutions of higher education are experimenting with a variety of possibilities.  The circleUniversity of Colorado at Boulder has the largest program hearing over 300 cases in 2007-2008.  Five members of a trained group of students, staff members, and community members hear two cases four days a week.   The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor offers restorative justice options through its Office of Student Conflict Resolution.  In 2007-2008, three-quarters of its 400 cases were resolved by restorative justice and other alternative options.

    IRJRD promotes the use of restorative justice dialogue for student misconduct and provides consultation to the Office of the Ombudsperson at The University of Texas at Austin for the following activities:

  • Research on restorative justice practices at specific college and university campuses.
  • Assistance in visiting campuses that are using restorative practices.
  • Implementation of study groups comprised of administration, faculty and staff to explore the application of restorative justice to student misconduct at The University of Texas at Austin.
  • Participation in webinars on the use of restorative justice on college campuses.

    A planning group for implementation of restorative justice dialogue at The University of Texas at Austin has been formed.  Interested persons should contact:

    laurenLauren Bloom, Ombudsperson

    Office of the Ombudsperson
    The University of Texas at Austin
    1 University Station A6000
    Austin, TX  78712

    Student Services Building G1.404
    (512) 471-3825
    (512) 475-6096 (fax)