skip to main content

 

Methods of Evaluating the Redundancy of Steel Bridges

Project Number: 5498

Associated Researchers:

 Karl Frank

Eric Williamson

Graduate Students:

Tim Barnard

Catherine Hovell

Joshua Mouras

Jim Sutton

Sponsor: Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), FHWA, DOT

 

Project Summary

Bridges that are classified as failure critical by AASHTO require more frequent inspections thanother types of bridges, resulting in greater costs for their design and operation. These higher costs are justified if the use of such bridges does indeed pose a greater risk to the traveling public in comparison to other bridge types. Several historical events involving the failure of main loadcarrying members in steel bridges, however, have demonstrated the ability of bridges to have significant reserve load carrying capability. For example, the girder failure of the I-79 ridge at Neville Island in Pittsburgh in 1977 and the Hoan Bridge in Milwaukee in 2000 have shown that severe damage can occur without necessarily resulting in bridge collapse. Consequently, research is needed to characterize and define the different redundancies that can be safely incorporated into the evaluation of failure critical bridges. With such information, it may be possible to modify inspection procedures and bridge classifications so that costs are dramatically reduced. This project addresses the behavior of steel bridges after failure of a critical component. The research will include nonlinear structural modeling coupled with laboratory testing to validate analysis predictions. Modeling guidelines will be developed that can be used by bridge engineers to evaluate the behavior of steel bridges with critical structural components.



 



Send comments to fsel@www.utexas.edu
Copyright 2004