Construct Guide Appendices

Appendices: A B C D E G

Appendix A
Descriptions of the 16 Primary Personality Factors
(Adapted from the Administrator's manual for the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire,
1986)
A. FIRST-ORDER FACTORS
| Low score direction |
|
High score direction |
| Cool, reserved, impersonal, detached, formal, aloof People
who score low (sten of 1 to 3) tend to be stiff, cool, skeptical, and aloof. They like
things rather than people, working alone, and avoiding compromising viewpoints. They are
likely to be precise and "rigid" in their ways of doing things and in their
personal standards. In many occupations these are desirable traits. They may tend, at
times, to be critical, obstructive, or hard. |
vs.
Factor A |
Warm, outgoing, kindly, easygoing, participating, likes
people People who score high (sten of 8 to 10) tend to be good-natured, easygoing,
emotionally expressive, ready to cooperate, attentive to people, softhearted, kindly,
adaptable. They like occupations dealing with people and socially impressive situations,
and they readily form active groups. They are generous in personal relations, less afraid
of criticism, and better able to remember names of people. |
| Affected by feelings, emotionally less stable, easily
annoyed The person who scores low (1 to 3) tends to be low in frustration tolerance for
unsatisfactory conditions, changeable and plastic, evading necessary reality demands,
neurotically fatigued, fretful, easily annoyed and emotional, active in dissatisfaction,
having neurotic symptoms (phobias, sleep disturbances, psychosomatic complaints, etc.) |
vs.
Factor C |
Emotionally stable, mature, faces reality, calm The
person who scores high (8 to 10) tends to be emotionally mature, stable, realistic about
life, unruffled, possessing ego strength, better able to maintain solid group morale. |
| Submissive, humble, mild, easily led, accommodating Individuals
scoring low (1 to 3) tend to give way to others, to be docile, and to conform. They are
often dependent, confessing, anxious for obsessional correctness. |
vs.
Factor E |
Dominant, assertive, aggressive, stubborn, competitive,
bossy Individuals scoring high (8 to 10) are assertive, self-assured, and
independent-minded. They tend to be austere, a law unto themselves, hostile or
extrapunative, authoritarian (managing others), and disregarding of authority. |
| Sober, restrained, prudent, taciturn, serious Low
scorers tend to be restrained, reticent, and introspective. They are sometimes dour,
pessimistic, unduly deliberate, and considered smug and primly correct by observers. They
tend to be sober, dependable people. |
vs.
Factor F |
Enthusiastic, spontaneous, heedless, expressive,
cheerful High scorers tend to be cheerful, active, talkative, frank, expressive and
carefree. They are frequently chosen as elected leaders. They may be impulsive and
mercurial. |
| Expedient, disregards rules, self-indulgent People
who score low tend to be unsteady in purpose. They are often casual and lacking in effort
for group undertakings and cultural demands. Their freedom from group influence may lead
to antisocial acts, but at times makes them more effective, while their refusal to be
bound by rules causes them to have less somatic upset from stress. |
vs.
Factor G |
Conscientious, conforming, moralistic, staid, rule-bound
People who score high tend to be exacting in character , dominated by sense of duty,
persevering, responsible, planful, "fill the unforgiving minute." They are
usually conscientious and moralistic, and they prefer hard-working people to witty
companions. |
| Shy, threat-sensitive, timid, hesitant, intimidated Individuals
who score low on this trait tend to be shy, withdrawing, cautious, retiring,
"wallflowers." They usually have inferiority feelings and tend to be slow and
impeded in speech and in expressing themselves. They dislike occupations with personal
contacts, prefer one or two close friends to large groups, and are not given to keeping in
contact with all that is going on around them. |
vs.
Factor H |
Bold, venturesome, uninhibited, can take stress Individuals
who score high are sociable, bold, ready to try new things, spontaneous, and abundant in
emotional response. Their "thick-skinnedness" enables them to face wear and tear
in dealing with people and grueling fatigue. However, they can be careless of detail,
ignore danger signals, and consume much time talking. They tend to be "pushy"
and actively interested in the opposite sex. |
| Tough-minded, self-reliant, no-nonsense, rough,
realistic People who score low tend to be tough, realistic, "down to earth,"
independent, responsible, but skeptical of subjective, cultural elaborations. They are
sometimes unmoved, hard, cynical, and smug. They tend to keep a group operating on a
practical and realistic "no-nonsense" basis. |
vs.
Factor I |
Tender-minded, sensitive, overprotected, intuitive,
refined People who score high tend to be emotionally sensitive, day-dreaming,
artistically fastidious, and fanciful. They are sometimes demanding of attention and help,
impatient, dependent, temperamental, and not very realistic. They dislike crude people and
rough occupations. In a group, they often tend to slow up a group performance and to upset
group morale by undue fussiness. |
| Trusting, accepting conditions, easy to get on with The
person who scores low tends to be free of jealous tendencies, adaptable, cheerful,
uncompetitive, concerned about others, a good team worker. They are open and tolerant and
usually willing to take a chance with people. |
vs.
Factor L |
Suspicious, hard to fool, distrustful, skeptical People
who score high tend to be mistrusting and doubtful. They are often involved in their own
egos and are self-opinionated and interested in internal, mental life. Usually they are
deliberate in their actions, unconcerned about other people, and poor team members. |
| Practical, concerned with "down to earth"
issues, steady Low scorers tend to be anxious to do the right things, attentive to
practical matters, and subject to the dictation of what is obviously possible. They are
concerned over detail, able to keep their heads in emergencies, but are sometimes
unimaginative. In short, they are responsible to the outer, rather than the inner, world. |
vs.
Factor M |
Imaginative, absent-minded, absorbed in thought,
impractical High scorers tend to be unconventional, unconcerned over everyday matters,
self-motivated, imaginatively creative, concerned with "essentials," often
absorbed in thought, and oblivious of particular people and physical realities. Their
inner-directed interests sometimes lead to unrealistic situations accompanied by
expressive outbursts. Their individuality can cause them to be rejected in group
activities. |
| Forthright, unpretentious, open, genuine, artless Individuals
who score low have a lot of natural warmth and a genuine liking for people. They are
uncomplicated, sentimental, and unvarnished in their approach to people. |
vs.
Factor N |
Shrewd, polished, socially aware, diplomatic,
calculating Individuals who score high tend to be polished, experienced, and shrewd.
Their approach to people and problems is usually perceptive, hard-headed, and efficient -
an unsentimental approach to situations, an approach akin to cynicism. |
| Self-assured, secure, feels free of guilt, untroubled,
self-satisfied Persons with low scores tend to be unruffled and to have unshakable
nerve. They have a mature, unanxious confidence in themselves and their capacity to deal
with things. They can, however, be secure to the point of being insensitive to the
feedback of others. |
vs.
Factor O |
Apprehensive, self-blaming, guilt-prone, insecure,
worrying Persons with high scores have a strong sense of obligation and high
expectations of themselves. They tend to worry and feel anxious and guilt-stricken over
difficulties. Often they do not feel accepted in groups or free to participate. |
| Conservative, respecting traditional ideas Low
scorers are confident in what they have been taught to believe, and accept the "tried
and true," even when something else might be better. They are cautious and
compromising in regard to new ideas. Thus, they tend to oppose and postpone change, are
inclined to go along with tradition, are more conservative in religion and politics, and
tend not to be interested in analytical "intellectual" thought. |
Factor Q1
vs. |
Experimenting, liberal, critical, open to change High
scorers tend to be interested in intellectual matters and to have doubts on fundamental
issues. They are skeptical and inquiring regarding ideas, either old or new. Usually they
are more well informed, less inclined to moralize, more inclined to experiment in life
generally, and more tolerant of inconvenience and change. |
| Group-oriented, a "joiner" and sound follower,
listens to others Individuals who score low prefer to work and make decisions with
other people and like and depend on social approval and admiration. They may tend to go
along with the group and may be lacking in individual resolution. They are not necessarily
gregarious by choice; rather they might need group support. |
Factor Q2
vs. |
Self-sufficient, resourceful, prefers own decisions Individuals
who score high are temperamentally independent, accustomed to going their own way, making
decisions and taking action on their own. They discount public opinion, but are not
necessarily dominant in their relations with others (see factor E); in fact, they could be
hesitant to ask others for help. They do not dislike people, but simply do not need their
agreement or support. |
| Undisciplined self-conflict, lax, careless of social
rules People who score low will not be bothered with will control and have little
regard for social demands. They are impetuous and not overly considerate, careful, or
painstaking. They may feel maladjusted, and many maladjustments (especially the affective,
but not the paranoid) show Q3-. |
Factor Q3
vs. |
Following self-image, socially precise, compulsive People
who are high tend to have strong control of their emotions and general behavior, are
inclined to be socially aware and careful, and evidence what is commonly termed
"self-respect" and high regard for social reputation. They sometimes tend,
however, to be perfectionistic and obstinate. Effective leaders, and some paranoids, are
high on Q3. |
| Relaxed, tranquil, composed, has low drive, unfrustrated
Individuals who score low tend to be sedate, relaxed, composed, and satisfied (not
frustrated). In some situations, their over satisfaction can lead to laziness and low
performance, in the sense that low motivation produces little trial and error. |
Factor Q4
vs. |
Tense, frustrated, overwrought, has high drive Individuals
who score high tend to be tense, restless, fretful, impatient, and hard driving. They are
often fatigued, but unable to remain inactive. Their frustration represents an excess of
stimulated, but undischarged, drive. Extremely high tension level may disrupt school and
work performance. |
B. SECOND-ORDER FACTORS
In addition to interpreting the basic 16 primary traits, several other scores are
obtainable from various combinations of primary scales. In general, these are known as
composite scores, and they provide interpretive information about important criteria, such
as potential for success in a particular occupation, leadership ability, likelihood for
successful treatment outcome, to name a few. Five of these composite scales have special
interpretive meaning. They are called second-order factors and provide information at a
broader level of understanding. That is, they explain personality in terms of fewer, more
general, traits.
| Low score direction |
|
High score direction |
| Introversion The person who scores low (sten of 1 to
3) tends to be shy, self-sufficient, and inhibited in interpersonal contacts. this can be
either a favorable or unfavorable finding, depending upon the particular situation in
which the person is expected to function; e.g., introversion is a favorable predictor of
precision workmanship. |
EXTROVERSION |
Extroversion The person who scores high (sten of 8 to
10) is a socially outgoing, uninhibited person, good at making and maintaining
interpersonal contacts. This can be very favorable in situations that call for that type
of temperament, e.g., salesmanship, but should not be considered necessarily favorable as
a general predictor, e.g., of scholastic achievement. |
| Low Anxiety People who score low on this tend to be
those whose lives are generally satisfying, and those who are able to achieve those things
that seem to be important. However, an extremely low score can mean lack of motivation for
difficult tasks, as generally shown in studies relating anxiety to achievement. |
ANXIETY |
High Anxiety The people who score high on this factor
are high in anxiety as it is commonly understood. They need not be neurotic, since anxiety
could be situational, but it is probable that there are some maladjustments, i.e., they
are dissatisfied with the degree to which they are able to meet the demands of life and to
achieve what they desire. Very high anxiety is generally disruptive of performance and
productive of physical disturbances. |
| Emotional Sensitivity People who score low tend to be
strongly influenced by their emotions. They are likely to be gentle people (as in
gentlemen), with artistic or cultured interests. Low scorers are sensitive to their own
feelings, as well as to the feelings of others. They may, however, be slow to take
decisive action, preferring to give a problem much consideration. |
TOUGH POISE |
Tough Poise People who score high are more influenced
by the facts than by feelings. They tend to be bold, hard people, decisive and
enterprising, but often insensitive to other people. High scorers orient their behavior
toward the obvious, rather than to the subtleties of life. Hence, even though they are
able to make decisions quickly, they may take action without sufficient thought or
consideration. |
| Subduedness People who score low are group dependent,
chastened, passive personalities. They are likely to desire and need support from other
persons, and likely to orient their behavior toward persons who give such support. |
INDEPENDENCE
|
Independence People who score high tend to be
aggressive, independent, daring, incisive people. They will seek those situations where
such behavior is at least tolerated and possibly rewarded, and are likely to exhibit
considerable initiative. |
| Low Control People who score low typically do not act
according to others' values or out of a sense of duty. They tend to be nonconformists who
do not hesitate to bend the rules, or who develop their own set of rules whenever it is
expedient to do so. These are flexible people, yet because they tend to follow their own
impulses, they may not be as self-disciplined as some situations may require. Further,
they may be perceived as unreliable at times, because the rules by which they operate may
not be clear to others. |
SUPEREGO /CONTROL
vs. |
High Control People who score high typically have
strong superego controls; that is they have internalized the rules of the milieu in which
they function. Hence, they tend to conform to expectations that others have for them or to
expectations they have for themselves. They are quite reliable because they do not
"bend the rules"; however, they may be so controlled as to be perceived by
others as rigid or moralistic. |

APPENDIX B
List of Household Tasks
1. Go grocery shopping
2. Run errands
3. Buy household supplies
4. Buy wife's clothes
5. Buy husband's clothes
6. Make an expensive purchase
7. Make the beds
8. Straighten up the house, put things away
9. Clean the house (mop, wax, dust, vacuum)
10. Take out the garbage
11. Do laundry
12. Do ironing
13. Decorate the house, arrange furnishings |
14. Do repairs around the house
15. Pay bills
16. Budget, plan, review expenses
17. Make breakfast
18. Make or pack a lunch
19. Make dinner
20. Do the dishes
21. Do baking or canning
22. Gardening (pulling weeds, planting vegetables, cutting shrubs, etc)
23. Repair car or other vehicle
24. Wash or wax car or other vehicle
25. Make home improvements (carpentry, roofing, putting in store windows, etc.)
26. Mow lawn, rake leaves, shovel snow |

Appendix C
List of Leisure Activities
| 1. Go to a party 2. Go to a bar, tavern or night club
3. Go to a restaurant or other eating place
4. Watch TV during the daytime (before 5 P.M.)
5. Watch T.V. during the evening (after 5 P.M.)
6. Go to a concert
7. Listen to records, tapes or the radio (not just background music)
8. Go to a park or on a picnic
9. Go to a fair, outdoor show, or exhibit
10. Go to a movie
11. Read a book , newspaper or magazine
12. Work on a hobby (carpentry, embroidery, collecting)
13. Go to a meeting of a hobby club, interest group, gun club, bridge club, etc.)
14. Go to a meeting of a service club, community organization, political
group (labor union, etc.)
15. Go shopping or browsing
16. Go to a garage sale, auction, or flea market
17. Go for a drive or motorcycle ride, just to drive around
18. Play a musical instrument
19. Entertain friends or relatives in your own home
20. Go to a play
21. Go for a walk
22. Go dancing
23. Play a table game (cards, monopoly, checkers, puzzles, etc.)
24. Play pool, pinball, or an electronic game
25. Go hunting or fishing |
26. Go hiking, camping or backpacking 27. Go to a class or
lesson (cake decorating class, woodworking class, guitar lesson, etc.)
28. Go to the library
29. Attend church or other religious activity
30. Visit with friends or relatives in their homes
31. Go to a baseball/softball game
32. Go to a basketball game
33. Go to a football game
34. Go to a wrestling match
35. Go to a car or motorcycle or dirt bike race
36. Play baseball/softball
37. Play basketball
38. Play touch football
39. Play tennis
40. Play frisbee
41. Go jogging or running
42. Go ice skating
43. Go bowling
44. Go bicycle riding
45. Do exercises (calisthenics)
46. Go skiing (downhill or cross country)
47. Go swimming
48. Play golf
49. Play racquetball (or handball)
50. Go horseback riding |

Appendix D
Change in Rate of Progress Toward Marriage Code
(Adapted from Surra, 1980)
Fourteen Category Coding Scheme: Categories and Definitions
(P refers to one partner, 0 the other, and P-0 the dyad).
The change in rate of progress toward marriage code is a system for classifying
respondents' perceptions of why changes in the chance of marriage, or changes in the rate
of change occurred, during the courtship. Factors perceived as affecting the chance of
marriage are categorized as individual, dyadic, network, or circumstantial. Within each of
the first three categories, there are several subcategories. Explanations are made for
each upturn, downturn, or leveling off of the probability of marriage. The table below
defines each factor and provides illustrations of explanations. Details concerning the
procedures used to probe respondents and code their answers can be found in the codebook.
Individual
Factors
Any factor that affects P's or O's view of the desirability of marriage as a lifestyle
or of the suitability of P and/or O as a marriage partners that is not anchored in P-O
interaction, P's or O's interactions with third parties, or circumstances beyond P's or
O's control. This category includes any predispositions or attitudes brought to the
relationship or that exist concurrently with, but independent of P-O interaction. Most
individual factors will involve the respondent's predispositions, but the identified
factor may sometimes be P's perceptions of O's dispositions |
| Timing or social clock beliefs |
Any statement that reflects an internalized belief that a
particular level of involvement is appropriate or inappropriate for a person in P's or O's
life situation. Timing or social clock factors include perceptions about whether dating,
engagement, or marriage is desirable or suitable, given one's particular age, job or
educational status, or financial situation |
 |
"I had just turned 16 and I didn't want to get tied to
one person because I was so young." |
 |
"Now that I was out of college, I felt that I should
start getting serious about our relationship since I was not a kid anymore." |
|
| Stand-ards for a suitable partner |
Any statement which reflects an evaluation of O by P, or of P by O,
against some predetermined standard for an ideal or suitable partner. These standards are
those perceptions relating to P's beliefs about how well O measures up as a partner, or
O's beliefs about how well P measures up. These standards may change during the course of
a relationship. |
 |
"My new job at IBM required me to socialize a lot.
Sally enjoyed this and fit right in." |
 |
"I'm happy-go-lucky and like to have a good time. Jill
likes outgoing men." |
|
| Relationship standards |
Any statement that reflects either P's or O's evaluation of the
relationship against a predetermined standard for what characteristics a relationship
should have. This evaluation (favorable or unfavorable) compares or contrasts the actual
relationship with an ideal or suitable relationship. |
 |
" I found that we were able to compromise with each
others Since we could, the marriage would work out." |
 |
"Sue liked it that we enjoyed the same activities.
Although this wasn't important to me, it counted for a lot as far as she was
concerned." |
|
| Fear or attraction predispositions |
Any statement of fear of or attraction to entering or escalating the
level of involvement with the partner. Fear or attraction predispositions may be expressed
in terms of fear or attraction to: (1) entering a new relationship with the partner; (2)
increasing time spent with the partner; (3) increasing attachment to the partner; (4)
committing oneself to engagement or the institution of marriage. |
 |
"When we first met I felt that I didn't want to get
tied down again since I had just broken off a three-year relationship. |
 |
"Jim had just broken up with another girl and was very
open to a relationship when I met him." |
|
Dyadic Inferences
Any factor that influences P's perception of the change in the rate of progress toward
marriage which is anchored in P-O interaction in which P and O relabel their level of
involvement or commitments. Respondents will often given statements that involve more than
one of the dyadic factors. In such instances, all are coded. |
| Redefinitions of the level of involvement |
Any statement summarizing an episode, event, or particular interaction in
which P and O relabel their level of involvement or commitment. Redefinitions of the level
of involvement occur when, as a result of some exchange of information (e.g., talking,
letters), P and O arrive at a new consensus about their level of involvement. |
 |
"After a long talk, we decided that we should start
dating others again." |
 |
"It was after the Senior prom that he gave me his class
ring. I accepted it and that meant that we were 'semi-committed' or 'going together' as a
couple." |
|
| Conflict |
Any statement which reflects the impact of disagreement or overt fighting
on the change in rate of progress toward marriage. |
 |
"He got a very good job offer from an oil company in
New Orleans and he wanted the job a lot. I would have been willing to go there if there
had been something there for me, a job, grad school, or something. He wanted to go and I
didn't so we went around and around in circles over this." |
 |
"I was back in school then. I had to spend a lot of
time on my studies and she was always upset and complaining about it, and finally we had a
big fight." |
|
| Self-disclosure |
Any statement which describes a particular interaction between and O
during which information with special meaning was expressed. This category includes
statements which describe how either P or O revealed some biographical information (e.g.,
background, hobbies), an intimate or personal secret, or a network secret (e.g., stories
about family members or friends) to the partner. |
 |
"I explained to her I was afraid to tell my parents
about our relationship. In the past they had become upset at my making a commitment to
someone of a different religion." |
 |
"We talked all about our childhoods and really got to
know each other." |
|
| Interpersonal Events with Symbolic Meaning |
Any statement summarizing an episode, event, or a particular interaction
in which P & O exchanges physical contact, some object, or action. The exchange does
not necessarily entail a major cost to the giver, but has some special or symbolic
significance to either P or O, or both. |
 |
"For my birthday he gave me a small stuffed dog. I felt
it important because he remembered me and I felt surprised that he chose me to give a gift
to." |
 |
"He gave up a good job he had been offered so he could
stay in the same town with me." |
 |
"That was the first time we made love." |
|
| Recogni-tion of change in the amount of interdependence |
Any statement which reflects the recognition of change in the amount of
interdependence between P & O, or of P's or O's dependence on the other. Redefinitions
of the level of involvement may be based on the recognition of change in interdependence.
Such redefinitions should be coded under this category as well as the
"redefinition" category. The present category should not be confused with
standards for a suitable partner, or relationship standards. |
 |
"He went away for Christmas, and we were both surprised
at how much we missed each other." |
 |
"I was thinking about Mary all the time. I wanted to be
with her every minute of the day. When I was with her, I was completely happy." |
|
Social Network Inferences
Any factor which affects P's perception of change in the rate of progress
toward marriage which involves interaction between P and the network, O and the network, P
& O and the network, or the network independent of P & O. The social network
includes family members, friends, other dating partners, neighbors, coworkers, and
acquaintances |
| P with Others |
Any statement which reflects P's interaction with others. |
 |
"My friend were telling me that I was getting too
involved with Sue." |
 |
"My parents told me that John was a nice man and that
if I decided to marry him it would be agreeable to them." |
|
| O with Others. |
Any statement which reflects P's perception of O's interaction with
others. |
 |
"Her father told her he objected to our dating because
of my age. When we first started dating I was 20 and she was 16." |
 |
"Joe was still going out with another woman and didn't
want to go steady." |
|
| P and O with others. |
Any statement which reflects P's perception of dyadic interaction with
the network. |
 |
"I went down to see his family. We all got along really
well and I saw that there was no problem there. Both his mother and father seemed to like
me and I liked them." |
 |
"Our friends kept teasing us, and telling us we were
made for each other." |
|
| Others Independent of P & O |
Any statement which reflects family members, friends, or others
interacting independently of the dyad. |
 |
"That was the time our parents met and they just didn't
hit it off." |
|
Other |
| Circumstantial |
Any factor which affects P's perceptions of change in the rate of
progress toward marriage which is an unplanned event affecting either P or O or both.
Circumstantial factors include events that are related to jobs, health, physical
separation, or other occurrences. Circumstantial events are those over which P or O have
little or no influence. |
 |
"I had a car accident and was laid up in the hospital
for a month." |
 |
"Thanks to a computer screw-up my paycheck was delayed
for a month and a half." |
|

Appendix E
Telephone Diary: Household Task Groups
A. Shopping/Errands
Go grocery shopping
Run errands
Buy household supplies
Buy wife's clothes
Buy husband's clothes
Make an expensive purchase
B. Indoor Maintenance
Make the bed(s)
Straighten up the house, put things away
Clean the house (mop, wax, dust, vacuum)
Take out the garbage
Do laundry
Do ironing
Decorate the house, arrange furnishings
Do repairs around the house
C. Finances
Pay bills
Budget, plan or review expenses
D. Food Preparation/Clean-up
Make breakfast
Make or pack lunch
Make dinner
Do the dishes
Do baking or canning
E. Outdoor Maintenance
Gardening (pulling weeds, planting vegetables, etc.)
Repair car or other vehicle
Make home improvements (carpentry, roofing, etc.)
Wash or wax car or other vehicle
Mow lawn, rake leaves, shovel snow
F. Child Care (Phases are noted)
Feed child (1-3)
Change or dress child (1)
Change child's wet diapers (2-3)
Dress child (2-3)
Bathe child (1-3)
Soothe child (1-3)
Put child to sleep (1-3)
Get up at night with child (2-3)
Help child learn new skills (2-3)
Plan child's activities (bedtime,
Outdoor play, meals, etc.) (2-3)
Pick up after child (2-3)
Take child on outing (2-3)
Read to child (2-3)
Set rules & handle misbehavior (2-3)
Play with child (1-2)
Quiet play (puzzles, dolls, etc.) (3)
Active, rough & tumble play (3)

Appendix F
Indexing Household Task Performance
This appendix is not available on the web. Please reference the hard
copy of this document.

Appendix G
Telephone Diary: Leisure Activity Groups
A. Home Activities
Watch TV during daytime
Watch TV during evening
Listen to records, tapes, or radio (not just background music)
Read a book, newspaper, or magazine
Work on a hobby (carpentry, collecting, embroidery, etc.)
Play a musical instrument
B. Going Out for Entertainment (I)
Go to a party
Go dancing
Go to a restaurant or other eating place
Go to a movie
Go to a concert
Go to a play
Go to a sporting event (football, or basketball game, race, etc.)a
C. Sports and Games
Go for a walk
Play a table game (cards, Monopoly, checkers, puzzles, etc.)
Play pool, pinball, or an electronic game
Go hiking, camping, or backpacking
Exercise or play a sport (such as jogging, softball, bowling, etc. - - the interviewer
coded the specific sporting event the respondent identified).
D. Going Out for Entertainment (II)
Go to the park or on a picnic
Go to a fair, outdoor show, exhibit
Go shopping or browsing
Go to a garage sale, auction, or flea market
Go for a drive or motorcycle ride (just to drive around)
E. Socializing
Entertain friends or relatives in your own home
Visit friends or relatives in their homes
F. Miscellaneous Activities
Go to a meeting of a hobby club or interest group
Go to a meeting of a service club, community organization, or political group
Go to the library
Go to church, or other religious activity
Go to a class or lesson

|