Construct Guide Appendices

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendices: A B C D E G

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix A

Descriptions of the 16 Primary Personality Factors

(Adapted from the Administrator's manual for the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire, 1986)

A. FIRST-ORDER FACTORS

Low score direction   High score direction
Cool, reserved, impersonal, detached, formal, aloof

People who score low (sten of 1 to 3) tend to be stiff, cool, skeptical, and aloof. They like things rather than people, working alone, and avoiding compromising viewpoints. They are likely to be precise and "rigid" in their ways of doing things and in their personal standards. In many occupations these are desirable traits. They may tend, at times, to be critical, obstructive, or hard.

vs.



Factor A

Warm, outgoing, kindly, easygoing, participating, likes people

People who score high (sten of 8 to 10) tend to be good-natured, easygoing, emotionally expressive, ready to cooperate, attentive to people, softhearted, kindly, adaptable. They like occupations dealing with people and socially impressive situations, and they readily form active groups. They are generous in personal relations, less afraid of criticism, and better able to remember names of people.

Affected by feelings, emotionally less stable, easily annoyed

The person who scores low (1 to 3) tends to be low in frustration tolerance for unsatisfactory conditions, changeable and plastic, evading necessary reality demands, neurotically fatigued, fretful, easily annoyed and emotional, active in dissatisfaction, having neurotic symptoms (phobias, sleep disturbances, psychosomatic complaints, etc.)

vs.

Factor C

Emotionally stable, mature, faces reality, calm

The person who scores high (8 to 10) tends to be emotionally mature, stable, realistic about life, unruffled, possessing ego strength, better able to maintain solid group morale.

Submissive, humble, mild, easily led, accommodating

Individuals scoring low (1 to 3) tend to give way to others, to be docile, and to conform. They are often dependent, confessing, anxious for obsessional correctness.

vs.

Factor E

Dominant, assertive, aggressive, stubborn, competitive, bossy

Individuals scoring high (8 to 10) are assertive, self-assured, and independent-minded. They tend to be austere, a law unto themselves, hostile or extrapunative, authoritarian (managing others), and disregarding of authority.

Sober, restrained, prudent, taciturn, serious

Low scorers tend to be restrained, reticent, and introspective. They are sometimes dour, pessimistic, unduly deliberate, and considered smug and primly correct by observers. They tend to be sober, dependable people.

vs.



Factor F

Enthusiastic, spontaneous, heedless, expressive, cheerful

High scorers tend to be cheerful, active, talkative, frank, expressive and carefree. They are frequently chosen as elected leaders. They may be impulsive and mercurial.

Expedient, disregards rules, self-indulgent

People who score low tend to be unsteady in purpose. They are often casual and lacking in effort for group undertakings and cultural demands. Their freedom from group influence may lead to antisocial acts, but at times makes them more effective, while their refusal to be bound by rules causes them to have less somatic upset from stress.

vs.

Factor G

Conscientious, conforming, moralistic, staid, rule-bound

People who score high tend to be exacting in character , dominated by sense of duty, persevering, responsible, planful, "fill the unforgiving minute." They are usually conscientious and moralistic, and they prefer hard-working people to witty companions.

Shy, threat-sensitive, timid, hesitant, intimidated

Individuals who score low on this trait tend to be shy, withdrawing, cautious, retiring, "wallflowers." They usually have inferiority feelings and tend to be slow and impeded in speech and in expressing themselves. They dislike occupations with personal contacts, prefer one or two close friends to large groups, and are not given to keeping in contact with all that is going on around them.

vs.

Factor H

Bold, venturesome, uninhibited, can take stress

Individuals who score high are sociable, bold, ready to try new things, spontaneous, and abundant in emotional response. Their "thick-skinnedness" enables them to face wear and tear in dealing with people and grueling fatigue. However, they can be careless of detail, ignore danger signals, and consume much time talking. They tend to be "pushy" and actively interested in the opposite sex.

Tough-minded, self-reliant, no-nonsense, rough, realistic

People who score low tend to be tough, realistic, "down to earth," independent, responsible, but skeptical of subjective, cultural elaborations. They are sometimes unmoved, hard, cynical, and smug. They tend to keep a group operating on a practical and realistic "no-nonsense" basis.



vs.

Factor I

Tender-minded, sensitive, overprotected, intuitive, refined

People who score high tend to be emotionally sensitive, day-dreaming, artistically fastidious, and fanciful. They are sometimes demanding of attention and help, impatient, dependent, temperamental, and not very realistic. They dislike crude people and rough occupations. In a group, they often tend to slow up a group performance and to upset group morale by undue fussiness.

Trusting, accepting conditions, easy to get on with

The person who scores low tends to be free of jealous tendencies, adaptable, cheerful, uncompetitive, concerned about others, a good team worker. They are open and tolerant and usually willing to take a chance with people.

vs.

Factor L

Suspicious, hard to fool, distrustful, skeptical

People who score high tend to be mistrusting and doubtful. They are often involved in their own egos and are self-opinionated and interested in internal, mental life. Usually they are deliberate in their actions, unconcerned about other people, and poor team members.

Practical, concerned with "down to earth" issues, steady

Low scorers tend to be anxious to do the right things, attentive to practical matters, and subject to the dictation of what is obviously possible. They are concerned over detail, able to keep their heads in emergencies, but are sometimes unimaginative. In short, they are responsible to the outer, rather than the inner, world.

vs.

Factor M

Imaginative, absent-minded, absorbed in thought, impractical

High scorers tend to be unconventional, unconcerned over everyday matters, self-motivated, imaginatively creative, concerned with "essentials," often absorbed in thought, and oblivious of particular people and physical realities. Their inner-directed interests sometimes lead to unrealistic situations accompanied by expressive outbursts. Their individuality can cause them to be rejected in group activities.

Forthright, unpretentious, open, genuine, artless

Individuals who score low have a lot of natural warmth and a genuine liking for people. They are uncomplicated, sentimental, and unvarnished in their approach to people.

vs.



Factor N

Shrewd, polished, socially aware, diplomatic, calculating

Individuals who score high tend to be polished, experienced, and shrewd. Their approach to people and problems is usually perceptive, hard-headed, and efficient - an unsentimental approach to situations, an approach akin to cynicism.

Self-assured, secure, feels free of guilt, untroubled, self-satisfied

Persons with low scores tend to be unruffled and to have unshakable nerve. They have a mature, unanxious confidence in themselves and their capacity to deal with things. They can, however, be secure to the point of being insensitive to the feedback of others.

vs.



Factor O

Apprehensive, self-blaming, guilt-prone, insecure, worrying

Persons with high scores have a strong sense of obligation and high expectations of themselves. They tend to worry and feel anxious and guilt-stricken over difficulties. Often they do not feel accepted in groups or free to participate.

Conservative, respecting traditional ideas

Low scorers are confident in what they have been taught to believe, and accept the "tried and true," even when something else might be better. They are cautious and compromising in regard to new ideas. Thus, they tend to oppose and postpone change, are inclined to go along with tradition, are more conservative in religion and politics, and tend not to be interested in analytical "intellectual" thought.

Factor Q1

vs.

Experimenting, liberal, critical, open to change

High scorers tend to be interested in intellectual matters and to have doubts on fundamental issues. They are skeptical and inquiring regarding ideas, either old or new. Usually they are more well informed, less inclined to moralize, more inclined to experiment in life generally, and more tolerant of inconvenience and change.

Group-oriented, a "joiner" and sound follower, listens to others

Individuals who score low prefer to work and make decisions with other people and like and depend on social approval and admiration. They may tend to go along with the group and may be lacking in individual resolution. They are not necessarily gregarious by choice; rather they might need group support.

Factor Q2

vs.

Self-sufficient, resourceful, prefers own decisions

Individuals who score high are temperamentally independent, accustomed to going their own way, making decisions and taking action on their own. They discount public opinion, but are not necessarily dominant in their relations with others (see factor E); in fact, they could be hesitant to ask others for help. They do not dislike people, but simply do not need their agreement or support.

Undisciplined self-conflict, lax, careless of social rules

People who score low will not be bothered with will control and have little regard for social demands. They are impetuous and not overly considerate, careful, or painstaking. They may feel maladjusted, and many maladjustments (especially the affective, but not the paranoid) show Q3-.

Factor Q3

vs.

Following self-image, socially precise, compulsive

People who are high tend to have strong control of their emotions and general behavior, are inclined to be socially aware and careful, and evidence what is commonly termed "self-respect" and high regard for social reputation. They sometimes tend, however, to be perfectionistic and obstinate. Effective leaders, and some paranoids, are high on Q3.

Relaxed, tranquil, composed, has low drive, unfrustrated

Individuals who score low tend to be sedate, relaxed, composed, and satisfied (not frustrated). In some situations, their over satisfaction can lead to laziness and low performance, in the sense that low motivation produces little trial and error.

Factor Q4

vs.

Tense, frustrated, overwrought, has high drive

Individuals who score high tend to be tense, restless, fretful, impatient, and hard driving. They are often fatigued, but unable to remain inactive. Their frustration represents an excess of stimulated, but undischarged, drive. Extremely high tension level may disrupt school and work performance.

B. SECOND-ORDER FACTORS

In addition to interpreting the basic 16 primary traits, several other scores are obtainable from various combinations of primary scales. In general, these are known as composite scores, and they provide interpretive information about important criteria, such as potential for success in a particular occupation, leadership ability, likelihood for successful treatment outcome, to name a few. Five of these composite scales have special interpretive meaning. They are called second-order factors and provide information at a broader level of understanding. That is, they explain personality in terms of fewer, more general, traits.

Low score direction   High score direction
Introversion

The person who scores low (sten of 1 to 3) tends to be shy, self-sufficient, and inhibited in interpersonal contacts. this can be either a favorable or unfavorable finding, depending upon the particular situation in which the person is expected to function; e.g., introversion is a favorable predictor of precision workmanship.



EXTROVERSION
Extroversion

The person who scores high (sten of 8 to 10) is a socially outgoing, uninhibited person, good at making and maintaining interpersonal contacts. This can be very favorable in situations that call for that type of temperament, e.g., salesmanship, but should not be considered necessarily favorable as a general predictor, e.g., of scholastic achievement.

Low Anxiety

People who score low on this tend to be those whose lives are generally satisfying, and those who are able to achieve those things that seem to be important. However, an extremely low score can mean lack of motivation for difficult tasks, as generally shown in studies relating anxiety to achievement.

ANXIETY High Anxiety

The people who score high on this factor are high in anxiety as it is commonly understood. They need not be neurotic, since anxiety could be situational, but it is probable that there are some maladjustments, i.e., they are dissatisfied with the degree to which they are able to meet the demands of life and to achieve what they desire. Very high anxiety is generally disruptive of performance and productive of physical disturbances.

Emotional Sensitivity

People who score low tend to be strongly influenced by their emotions. They are likely to be gentle people (as in gentlemen), with artistic or cultured interests. Low scorers are sensitive to their own feelings, as well as to the feelings of others. They may, however, be slow to take decisive action, preferring to give a problem much consideration.

TOUGH POISE

Tough Poise

People who score high are more influenced by the facts than by feelings. They tend to be bold, hard people, decisive and enterprising, but often insensitive to other people. High scorers orient their behavior toward the obvious, rather than to the subtleties of life. Hence, even though they are able to make decisions quickly, they may take action without sufficient thought or consideration.

Subduedness

People who score low are group dependent, chastened, passive personalities. They are likely to desire and need support from other persons, and likely to orient their behavior toward persons who give such support.

INDEPENDENCE

Independence

People who score high tend to be aggressive, independent, daring, incisive people. They will seek those situations where such behavior is at least tolerated and possibly rewarded, and are likely to exhibit considerable initiative.

Low Control

People who score low typically do not act according to others' values or out of a sense of duty. They tend to be nonconformists who do not hesitate to bend the rules, or who develop their own set of rules whenever it is expedient to do so. These are flexible people, yet because they tend to follow their own impulses, they may not be as self-disciplined as some situations may require. Further, they may be perceived as unreliable at times, because the rules by which they operate may not be clear to others.

SUPEREGO

/CONTROL

vs.

High Control

People who score high typically have strong superego controls; that is they have internalized the rules of the milieu in which they function. Hence, they tend to conform to expectations that others have for them or to expectations they have for themselves. They are quite reliable because they do not "bend the rules"; however, they may be so controlled as to be perceived by others as rigid or moralistic.

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

APPENDIX B

List of Household Tasks

1. Go grocery shopping
2. Run errands
3. Buy household supplies
4. Buy wife's clothes
5. Buy husband's clothes
6. Make an expensive purchase
7. Make the beds
8. Straighten up the house, put things away
9. Clean the house (mop, wax, dust, vacuum)
10. Take out the garbage
11. Do laundry
12. Do ironing
13. Decorate the house, arrange furnishings
14. Do repairs around the house
15. Pay bills
16. Budget, plan, review expenses
17. Make breakfast
18. Make or pack a lunch
19. Make dinner
20. Do the dishes
21. Do baking or canning
22. Gardening (pulling weeds, planting vegetables, cutting shrubs, etc)
23. Repair car or other vehicle
24. Wash or wax car or other vehicle
25. Make home improvements (carpentry, roofing, putting in store windows, etc.)
26. Mow lawn, rake leaves, shovel snow

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix C

List of Leisure Activities

1. Go to a party

2. Go to a bar, tavern or night club

3. Go to a restaurant or other eating place

4. Watch TV during the daytime (before 5 P.M.)

5. Watch T.V. during the evening (after 5 P.M.)

6. Go to a concert

7. Listen to records, tapes or the radio (not just background music)

8. Go to a park or on a picnic

9. Go to a fair, outdoor show, or exhibit

10. Go to a movie

11. Read a book , newspaper or magazine

12. Work on a hobby (carpentry, embroidery, collecting)

13. Go to a meeting of a hobby club, interest group, gun club, bridge club, etc.)

14. Go to a meeting of a service club, community organization, political

group (labor union, etc.)

15. Go shopping or browsing

16. Go to a garage sale, auction, or flea market

17. Go for a drive or motorcycle ride, just to drive around

18. Play a musical instrument

19. Entertain friends or relatives in your own home

20. Go to a play

21. Go for a walk

22. Go dancing

23. Play a table game (cards, monopoly, checkers, puzzles, etc.)

24. Play pool, pinball, or an electronic game

25. Go hunting or fishing

26. Go hiking, camping or backpacking

27. Go to a class or lesson (cake decorating class, woodworking class, guitar lesson, etc.)

28. Go to the library

29. Attend church or other religious activity

30. Visit with friends or relatives in their homes

31. Go to a baseball/softball game

32. Go to a basketball game

33. Go to a football game

34. Go to a wrestling match

35. Go to a car or motorcycle or dirt bike race

36. Play baseball/softball

37. Play basketball

38. Play touch football

39. Play tennis

40. Play frisbee

41. Go jogging or running

42. Go ice skating

43. Go bowling

44. Go bicycle riding

45. Do exercises (calisthenics)

46. Go skiing (downhill or cross country)

47. Go swimming

48. Play golf

49. Play racquetball (or handball)

50. Go horseback riding

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix D

Change in Rate of Progress Toward Marriage Code (Adapted from Surra, 1980)

Fourteen Category Coding Scheme: Categories and Definitions

(P refers to one partner, 0 the other, and P-0 the dyad).
The change in rate of progress toward marriage code is a system for classifying respondents' perceptions of why changes in the chance of marriage, or changes in the rate of change occurred, during the courtship. Factors perceived as affecting the chance of marriage are categorized as individual, dyadic, network, or circumstantial. Within each of the first three categories, there are several subcategories. Explanations are made for each upturn, downturn, or leveling off of the probability of marriage. The table below defines each factor and provides illustrations of explanations. Details concerning the procedures used to probe respondents and code their answers can be found in the codebook.

Individual Factors

Any factor that affects P's or O's view of the desirability of marriage as a lifestyle or of the suitability of P and/or O as a marriage partners that is not anchored in P-O interaction, P's or O's interactions with third parties, or circumstances beyond P's or O's control. This category includes any predispositions or attitudes brought to the relationship or that exist concurrently with, but independent of P-O interaction. Most individual factors will involve the respondent's predispositions, but the identified factor may sometimes be P's perceptions of O's dispositions

Timing or social clock beliefs Any statement that reflects an internalized belief that a particular level of involvement is appropriate or inappropriate for a person in P's or O's life situation. Timing or social clock factors include perceptions about whether dating, engagement, or marriage is desirable or suitable, given one's particular age, job or educational status, or financial situation
"I had just turned 16 and I didn't want to get tied to one person because I was so young."
"Now that I was out of college, I felt that I should start getting serious about our relationship since I was not a kid anymore."
Stand-ards for a suitable partner Any statement which reflects an evaluation of O by P, or of P by O, against some predetermined standard for an ideal or suitable partner. These standards are those perceptions relating to P's beliefs about how well O measures up as a partner, or O's beliefs about how well P measures up. These standards may change during the course of a relationship.
"My new job at IBM required me to socialize a lot. Sally enjoyed this and fit right in."
"I'm happy-go-lucky and like to have a good time. Jill likes outgoing men."
Relationship standards Any statement that reflects either P's or O's evaluation of the relationship against a predetermined standard for what characteristics a relationship should have. This evaluation (favorable or unfavorable) compares or contrasts the actual relationship with an ideal or suitable relationship.
" I found that we were able to compromise with each others Since we could, the marriage would work out."
"Sue liked it that we enjoyed the same activities. Although this wasn't important to me, it counted for a lot as far as she was concerned."
Fear or attraction

predispositions

Any statement of fear of or attraction to entering or escalating the level of involvement with the partner. Fear or attraction predispositions may be expressed in terms of fear or attraction to: (1) entering a new relationship with the partner; (2) increasing time spent with the partner; (3) increasing attachment to the partner; (4) committing oneself to engagement or the institution of marriage.
"When we first met I felt that I didn't want to get tied down again since I had just broken off a three-year relationship.
"Jim had just broken up with another girl and was very open to a relationship when I met him."

Dyadic Inferences

Any factor that influences P's perception of the change in the rate of progress toward marriage which is anchored in P-O interaction in which P and O relabel their level of involvement or commitments. Respondents will often given statements that involve more than one of the dyadic factors. In such instances, all are coded.

Redefinitions of the level of involvement Any statement summarizing an episode, event, or particular interaction in which P and O relabel their level of involvement or commitment. Redefinitions of the level of involvement occur when, as a result of some exchange of information (e.g., talking, letters), P and O arrive at a new consensus about their level of involvement.
"After a long talk, we decided that we should start dating others again."
"It was after the Senior prom that he gave me his class ring. I accepted it and that meant that we were 'semi-committed' or 'going together' as a couple."
Conflict Any statement which reflects the impact of disagreement or overt fighting on the change in rate of progress toward marriage.
"He got a very good job offer from an oil company in New Orleans and he wanted the job a lot. I would have been willing to go there if there had been something there for me, a job, grad school, or something. He wanted to go and I didn't so we went around and around in circles over this."
"I was back in school then. I had to spend a lot of time on my studies and she was always upset and complaining about it, and finally we had a big fight."
Self-disclosure Any statement which describes a particular interaction between and O during which information with special meaning was expressed. This category includes statements which describe how either P or O revealed some biographical information (e.g., background, hobbies), an intimate or personal secret, or a network secret (e.g., stories about family members or friends) to the partner.
"I explained to her I was afraid to tell my parents about our relationship. In the past they had become upset at my making a commitment to someone of a different religion."
"We talked all about our childhoods and really got to know each other."
Interpersonal Events with Symbolic Meaning Any statement summarizing an episode, event, or a particular interaction in which P & O exchanges physical contact, some object, or action. The exchange does not necessarily entail a major cost to the giver, but has some special or symbolic significance to either P or O, or both.
"For my birthday he gave me a small stuffed dog. I felt it important because he remembered me and I felt surprised that he chose me to give a gift to."
"He gave up a good job he had been offered so he could stay in the same town with me."
"That was the first time we made love."
Recogni-tion of change in the amount of interdependence Any statement which reflects the recognition of change in the amount of interdependence between P & O, or of P's or O's dependence on the other. Redefinitions of the level of involvement may be based on the recognition of change in interdependence. Such redefinitions should be coded under this category as well as the "redefinition" category. The present category should not be confused with standards for a suitable partner, or relationship standards.
"He went away for Christmas, and we were both surprised at how much we missed each other."
"I was thinking about Mary all the time. I wanted to be with her every minute of the day. When I was with her, I was completely happy."

Social Network Inferences

Any factor which affects P's perception of change in the rate of progress toward marriage which involves interaction between P and the network, O and the network, P & O and the network, or the network independent of P & O. The social network includes family members, friends, other dating partners, neighbors, coworkers, and acquaintances

P with Others Any statement which reflects P's interaction with others.
"My friend were telling me that I was getting too involved with Sue."
"My parents told me that John was a nice man and that if I decided to marry him it would be agreeable to them."
O with Others. Any statement which reflects P's perception of O's interaction with others.
"Her father told her he objected to our dating because of my age. When we first started dating I was 20 and she was 16."
"Joe was still going out with another woman and didn't want to go steady."
P and O with others. Any statement which reflects P's perception of dyadic interaction with the network.
"I went down to see his family. We all got along really well and I saw that there was no problem there. Both his mother and father seemed to like me and I liked them."
"Our friends kept teasing us, and telling us we were made for each other."
Others Independent of P & O Any statement which reflects family members, friends, or others interacting independently of the dyad.
"That was the time our parents met and they just didn't hit it off."

Other

Circumstantial Any factor which affects P's perceptions of change in the rate of progress toward marriage which is an unplanned event affecting either P or O or both. Circumstantial factors include events that are related to jobs, health, physical separation, or other occurrences. Circumstantial events are those over which P or O have little or no influence.
"I had a car accident and was laid up in the hospital for a month."
"Thanks to a computer screw-up my paycheck was delayed for a month and a half."

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix E

Telephone Diary: Household Task Groups

A. Shopping/Errands

Go grocery shopping

Run errands

Buy household supplies

Buy wife's clothes

Buy husband's clothes

Make an expensive purchase

B. Indoor Maintenance

Make the bed(s)

Straighten up the house, put things away

Clean the house (mop, wax, dust, vacuum)

Take out the garbage

Do laundry

Do ironing

Decorate the house, arrange furnishings

Do repairs around the house

C. Finances

Pay bills

Budget, plan or review expenses

D. Food Preparation/Clean-up

Make breakfast

Make or pack lunch

Make dinner

Do the dishes

Do baking or canning

E. Outdoor Maintenance

Gardening (pulling weeds, planting vegetables, etc.)

Repair car or other vehicle

Make home improvements (carpentry, roofing, etc.)

Wash or wax car or other vehicle

Mow lawn, rake leaves, shovel snow

F. Child Care (Phases are noted)

Feed child (1-3)

Change or dress child (1)

Change child's wet diapers (2-3)

Dress child (2-3)

Bathe child (1-3)

Soothe child (1-3)

Put child to sleep (1-3)

Get up at night with child (2-3)

Help child learn new skills (2-3)

Plan child's activities (bedtime,

Outdoor play, meals, etc.) (2-3)

Pick up after child (2-3)

Take child on outing (2-3)

Read to child (2-3)

Set rules & handle misbehavior (2-3)

Play with child (1-2)

Quiet play (puzzles, dolls, etc.) (3)

Active, rough & tumble play (3)

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix F

Indexing Household Task Performance

This appendix is not available on the web. Please reference the hard copy of this document.

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

Appendix G

Telephone Diary: Leisure Activity Groups

A. Home Activities

Watch TV during daytime

Watch TV during evening

Listen to records, tapes, or radio (not just background music)

Read a book, newspaper, or magazine

Work on a hobby (carpentry, collecting, embroidery, etc.)

Play a musical instrument

B. Going Out for Entertainment (I)

Go to a party

Go dancing

Go to a restaurant or other eating place

Go to a movie

Go to a concert

Go to a play

Go to a sporting event (football, or basketball game, race, etc.)a

C. Sports and Games

Go for a walk

Play a table game (cards, Monopoly, checkers, puzzles, etc.)

Play pool, pinball, or an electronic game

Go hiking, camping, or backpacking

Exercise or play a sport (such as jogging, softball, bowling, etc. - - the interviewer coded the specific sporting event the respondent identified).

D. Going Out for Entertainment (II)

Go to the park or on a picnic

Go to a fair, outdoor show, exhibit

Go shopping or browsing

Go to a garage sale, auction, or flea market

Go for a drive or motorcycle ride (just to drive around)

E. Socializing

Entertain friends or relatives in your own home

Visit friends or relatives in their homes

F. Miscellaneous Activities

Go to a meeting of a hobby club or interest group

Go to a meeting of a service club, community organization, or political group

Go to the library

Go to church, or other religious activity

Go to a class or lesson

custdiv2.gif (1802 bytes)

backbutton3.gif (1373 bytes)tocbutton2.gif (2101 bytes) nextbutton3.gif (1377 bytes)

custom1.gif (1802 bytes)

This page created & maintained by Shanna Smith, ella@utxsvs.cc.utexas.edu