Production and Placement of Superpave Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Pavement

By Tim Stone, BusterLab@neto.com
QCQA Lab Manager, Buster Concrete & Materials

Paving Train: Notice distance of roller in relation to paver. Essential in placement of Superpave. Recently, our company was awarded a highway contract from the Texas Department of Transportation on US 271 in Red River County. This contract consisted primarily of a two-inch hot mix overlay. Approximately eleven thousand tons of this material consisted of a 19.0mm Superpave hot mix.

TxDOT's technician James Hutchison Jr. formulated the design using the ATSER software for hot mix design. This design incorporated sandstone aggregates from Meridian's quarry in Sawyer, Oklahoma and PG 64-22 asphalt from Lion Oil Company. Using the ATSER software, trial blends were quickly developed and tested until a JMF was determined. JMF2 was run and tested successfully, leading to the actual production of the hot mix.





Paving Train: Notice distance of roller in relation
to paver. Essential in placement of Superpave.

Production began on October 30, 1997, using a CMI drum mix plant. Production, compared with a normal Type C hot mix, was a pleasant surprise. Although a higher temperature mix, approximatly 35% less fuel was required to produce this mix. The temperature of the hot mix during production was 325° F, the maximum allowed by permit. Segregation of the hot mix during batching did not occur.

Breakdown of MAT.

Breakdown of MAT. At the beginning of placement, the air temperature was 53° F and the conditions were cloudy. The hot mix was produced at a temperature of 325° F and transported 35 miles to the jobsite. The mix arrived at the jobsite at 300° F. The mix was dumped directly into a Roadtec RP-230 paver and breakdown was initially achieved using two Caterpillar 634-C twelve-ton rollers. Temeperature loss after one pass ranged between 30-40 degrees. Some tenderness in the mix was witnessed primarily due to the rollers' inability to coordinate the passes and starting and stopping too quickly. The rolling pattern consisted of four passes with both drums set in the vibratory mode at the high amplitude setting. Breakdown was eventually achieved using one breakdown roller. The second roller was used to remove roller marks after the mat temperature cooled below 190° F.




In conclusion, our experience with superpave hot mix has been very favorable. The superpave hot mix was placed under less than ideal conditions with the temperature a few mornings beginning in the low 40's. Production was much more economic than a normal Type C hot mix. Placement of the superpave was much better than expected. In place air voids for the superpave hot mix averaged 8% and certainly would have been higher if placement had occurred in warmer temperatures. The only surprise with this mix was the rapid temperature loss during placement. Again, our experience with Superpave was so favorable; we asked and received permission from TxDOT to complete this project using Superpave hot mixes.

Completed MAT.

Completed MAT.


















Return to Articles about Superpave
Return to Superpave Home Page

Project Manager: Dr. Yetkin Yildirim
Website Administrator: Clair LaVaye
© The Superpave Asphalt Research Program,
The University of Texas at Austin.