|
MERCURY and
TERLINGUA
Mercury is
obtained from cinnabar ore. In the late 1890’s mercury (“quicksilver”) was
discovered near Terlingua, Brewster County, Texas.
 |
Cinnabar is the ore from which the mineral mercury can be extracted.
Specimen to the left is on loan from Glen Evans personal collection.
It was found in one of the mines near Terlingua, Brewster County,
Texas.
This sample illustrated is about 3"x5". |
|
|
The ore was ground and heated and the mercury driven off as a vapor,
which later cooled and distilled.
Mercury flasks, such as this one collected from Terlingua by Glen
Evans, were used to collect that mercury.
Early fuels for this process were the local sotol and lechugilla
plants, available in great abundance in this region of Texas.
Specimen: TMM 878-1
Location: Old 44 mine, Terlingua, Brewster County, Texas
Period: Late 1800s
Collector: Glen L. Evans, 1947
Click on
the image to see the complete Museum catalog entry for these flasks |
 |
|
|
Mercury is a toxic substance. Workers breathed the fumes during
the smelting process, and subsequently suffered from loss of hair and
teeth. Extensive exposure sometimes resulted in insanity.
|
|
Mercury was used as a fungicide until the early 1970's, at which point
its use was banned in the USA.
Mercury is still used in dental amalgam, and as an amalgam for
extraction of gold and silver. |
 |
|
Lindheim & Dewees’ 45 ton furnace
Photograph
from the Adkins Collection , the Center for American History, The
University of Texas at Austin |
|
|
The Chisos Mine near Terlingua produced over 100,000 flasks of
mercury, and was the most productive mine in Texas. The miners
shown here were workers in 1908. The Chisos Mining Company filed
for bankruptcy in 1942. |
 |
Images of processor
and miners taken from Adkins Collection, with permission from the
Center for American History, the University of Texas at Austin |
|
More on cinnabar
More about mercury
production in Terlingua:
Sharpe, R.D., 1980,
Development of Mercury Mining Industry: Trans-Pecos Texas, Mineral Resource
Circular #64, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin.
|