In all Writing Flag courses (all UGS 302s and some 303s), at least one third of the final course grade must come from written work. Grades should reflect both the quality of students ideas and the mechanical competence of their writing. Model rubrics can help you formulate your grading criteria.
Well-thought-out grading criteria make assessing writing much easier. When students know the criteria ahead of time, they find it easier to write. We strongly encourage all Signature Course instructors to share their expectations for written work with students from the very beginning of the class.
Your goals for each assignment should guide you in developing grading criteria. Use language that reflects your strengths and the way you grade. If you don’t have an encyclopedic knowledge of grammar errors, judge a paper’s “coherence and readability” rather than “number of sentence boundary errors.”
Grading criteria can be simple or complex. They can analyze discrete elements of performance, or describe general traits that define papers in a given grade range. Analytical and holistic elements can be combined in a single set of grading criteria. Use the arrangement that best fits the way you think as you are grading and makes the most sense in terms of the particular assignment you are creating.
The benefits and drawbacks of analytical and holistic grading approaches are outlined on our Rubrics page, where you will also find models of different kinds of rubrics.
Share your criteria with students and use them at every stage of the writing process. When your students read and