The University of Texas at Austin
School of Undergraduate Studies
Skip navigation links

Holistic Grading Criteria

For more writing information, please visit our writing pages.

These evaluative criteria were developed by Dr. David Barndollar for a sophomore-level English course. The same five concerns are addressed at each grade level:

  • quality of ideas
  • development and organization
  • language and word choice
  • mechanics, and style

A Grade

Demonstrates unusual competence:

  • an ability to avoid the obvious and thus gain insights that are individual and often illuminating
  • a capacity to develop ideas flexibly and fluently, yet with control and purpose
  • a special concern for the bon mot, even if it entails coining a word that the language does not provide
  • an ability to use punctuation rhetorically, using it for effect as well as for clarity
  • a willingness to be inventive with words and structures in order to produce a clearly identifiable style, even though at times the efforts may be too deliberate or may fall short of the writer’s intentions

B Grade

Demonstrates competence:

  • an ability to absorb ideas and experience and to interpret them meaningfully in a context of the writer’s own conception
  • a capacity to develop an idea with a clear sense of order
  • a capacity to draw upon words adequate to express the writer’s own thoughts and feelings
  • an ability to use mechanics as an integral part of the meaning and effect of the prose
  • a capacity to consider alternate ways of expression as a means of making stylistic choices possible

C Grade

Suggests competence:

  • a tendency to depend on the self-evident and the clichéd and thus for the writer to write uninformative discourse
  • a tendency either to make the organization obvious or to write aimlessly without a plan
  • a limitation in the range of words and thus a dependence on the clichés and colloquialisms most available
  • an ability to use mechanics correctly or incorrectly in proportion to the plainness or complexity of the style
  • a general unawareness of choices that affect style and thus an inability to control the effects a writer may seek

D Grade

Suggests incompetence
(F: Demonstrates incompetence)

  • a tendency to exploit the obvious either because of a lack of understanding, inability to read, failure to grapple with a topic, or in many instances a lack of interest; substance of essays ranges from superficial to barren
  • a tendency to wander aimlessly because of a lack of overall conception or in some instances to have a semblance of form without the development that makes the parts a whole
  • a tendency to play safe with words, using ones the writer ordinarily speaks or the ones the writer can spell, placing obvious limits on variation of expression
  • a frequent inability to make careful distinctions between periods, commas, and semicolons, although some writers in these categories can write correct sentences if they keep structures simple
  • either a tendency to write highly convoluted sentences that are close to the rapid associations of our thoughts before we straighten them out or a tendency to play safe by avoiding the sentence elements that invite error (introductory modifiers, embedding, coordination, and various other sentence-combining techniques)